Latest & greatest articles for valsartan

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on valsartan or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on valsartan and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for valsartan

1. Sacubitril/valsartan for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Sacubitril/valsartan for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction '); } else { document.write(' '); } ACE | Sacubitril/valsartan for treating chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Search > > Sacubitril/valsartan for treating chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction - Sacubitril/valsartan for treating chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Published on 2 May 2019 Guidance Recommendations The Ministry of Health's Drug Advisory Committee has (...) not recommended listing sacubitril/valsartan on the Medication Assistance Fund (MAF) for treating chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction because of uncertain cost-effectiveness and budget impact at the price proposed by the manufacturer. Quicklinks | | | | | Copyrights © 2019 Ministry of Health, Singapore. Last Updated on 2 May 2019

2019 Appropriate Care Guides, Agency for Care Effectiveness (Singapore)

2. Association of Change in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Following Initiation of Sacubitril-Valsartan Treatment With Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. (Abstract)

Association of Change in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Following Initiation of Sacubitril-Valsartan Treatment With Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), treatment with sacubitril-valsartan reduces N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations. The effect of sacubitril-valsartan on cardiac remodeling is uncertain.To determine whether NT (...) -proBNP changes in patients with HFrEF treated with sacubitril-valsartan correlate with changes in measures of cardiac volume and function.Prospective, 12-month, single-group, open-label study of patients with HFrEF enrolled in 78 outpatient sites in the United States. Sacubitril-valsartan was initiated and the dose adjusted. Enrollment commenced on October 25, 2016, and follow-up was completed on October 22, 2018.NT-proBNP concentrations among patients treated with sacubitril-valsartan.The primary

2019 JAMA

3. Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. (Abstract)

Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril-valsartan reduces cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These benefits may be related to effects on hemodynamics and cardiac remodeling.To determine whether treatment of HFrEF with sacubitril-valsartan improves (...) central aortic stiffness and cardiac remodeling compared with enalapril.Randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 464 participants with heart failure and ejection fraction of 40% or less enrolled across 85 US sites between August 17, 2016, and June 28, 2018. Follow-up was completed on January 26, 2019.Randomization (1:1) to sacubitril-valsartan (n = 231; target dosage, 97/103 mg twice daily) vs enalapril (n = 233; target dosage, 10 mg twice daily) for 12 weeks.The primary outcome was change from

2019 JAMA Controlled trial quality: predicted high

4. Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Regulation in Patients With HFrEF (Abstract)

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Regulation in Patients With HFrEF Myocardial fibrosis is an important pathophysiological mechanism underlying the development of heart failure (HF). Given the biochemical targets of sacubitril/valsartan, we hypothesized that circulating biomarkers reflecting the mechanisms that determine extracellular matrix (ECM) homeostasis, including collagen synthesis, processing, and degradation, are altered by sacubitril/valsartan (...) in comparison to enalapril.The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on biomarkers of ECM homeostasis and the association between the rate of primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization) and these biomarkers.Biomarkers at baseline (n = 2,067) and both baseline and 8 months after randomization (n = 1,776) included aldosterone, soluble ST2 (sST2), tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, MMP-9

2019 EvidenceUpdates

5. The efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email

2019 PROSPERO

6. Efficacy of amlodipine besylate and valsartan (ABVS) for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension (MMH): a systematic review

Efficacy of amlodipine besylate and valsartan (ABVS) for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension (MMH): a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record

2019 PROSPERO

7. Efficacy of sacubitril valsartan sodium tablet (SVST) for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF): a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy of sacubitril valsartan sodium tablet (SVST) for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF): a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content

2019 PROSPERO

8. Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Irbesartan in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomised Double-Blind Trial Full Text available with Trip Pro

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Irbesartan in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomised Double-Blind Trial Sacubitril/valsartan reduces the risk of cardiovascular mortality among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but its effects on kidney function and cardiac biomarkers in people with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease are unknown.The UK HARP-III trial (United Kingdom Heart and Renal Protection-III), a randomized double-blind trial, included 414 (...) participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 20 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 who were randomly assigned to sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg twice daily versus irbesartan 300 mg once daily. The primary outcome was measured GFR at 12 months using ANCOVA with adjustment for each individual's baseline measured GFR. All analyses were by intention to treat.In total, 207 participants were assigned to sacubitril/valsartan and 207 to irbesartan. Baseline measured GFR was 34.0 (SE, 0.8) and 34.7 (SE, 0.8

2018 EvidenceUpdates

9. Use of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) contaminated valsartan products and risk of cancer: Danish nationwide cohort study. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Use of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) contaminated valsartan products and risk of cancer: Danish nationwide cohort study. To perform an expedited assessment of cancer risk associated with exposure to N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) through contaminated valsartan products.Nationwide cohort study.Danish health registries on individual level prescription drug use, cancer occurrence, and hospital diagnoses.5150 Danish patients with no history of cancer, aged 40 years or older, and using valsartan at 1 (...) January 2012 or initiating use between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2017. Participants were followed from one year after cohort entry (lag time period) until experiencing a cancer outcome, death, migration, or end of study period (30 June 2018). Each participant's exposure to NDMA (ever exposure and predefined categories of cumulative valsartan exposure) was mapped out as a time varying variable while also applying a one year lag.Association between NDMA exposure and a primary composite endpoint

2018 BMJ

10. Valsartan

Valsartan Top results for valsartan - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Find evidence fast ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4 (...) ) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Latest & greatest articles for valsartan The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted

2018 Trip Latest and Greatest

11. Sacubitril–valsartan in heart failure and multimorbidity patients Full Text available with Trip Pro

Sacubitril–valsartan in heart failure and multimorbidity patients The poor control of symptoms in patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection function (HFrEF) can limit the functionality of patients. Sacubitril-valsartan, compared with enalapril, has been shown to reduce mortality and hospitalization, and nowadays, there is still little evidence about the improvement on functionality. The aim of our study is to analyse the improvement of the functional class and the 6 min (...) walking test (6MWT) in patients with multiple pathologies and advanced heart failure.From September 2016 to March 2018, 65 multimorbidity patients with severe symptomatic HFrEF were initiated to receive sacubitril-valsartan. Mean age was 78.6 ± 7.4 years, and 68% were male. The Charlson co-morbidity index was 8 points. Seventy-four per cent had New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class IV. After the treatment, patients were able to achieve 55.68 m or more on 6MWT, and 91% presented

2018 ESC heart failure

12. EMA reviewing medicines containing valsartan from Zhejiang Huahai following detection of an impurity

EMA reviewing medicines containing valsartan from Zhejiang Huahai following detection of an impurity EMA reviewing medicines containing valsartan from Zhejiang Huahai following detection of an impurity: some valsartan medicines being recalled across the EU | European Medicines Agency Search Search Menu EMA reviewing medicines containing valsartan from Zhejiang Huahai following detection of an impurity: some valsartan medicines being recalled across the EU Press release 05/07/2018 The European (...) Medicines Agency (EMA) is reviewing medicines containing the valsartan that is supplied by Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceuticals, a company in Linhai, China. The review was triggered after the company detected an impurity, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), in the valsartan which the company supplies to manufacturers producing some of the valsartan medicines available in the EU. NDMA is classified as a probable human carcinogen (a substance that could cause cancer) based on results from laboratory tests

2018 European Medicines Agency - EPARs

13. Impact of sacubitril–valsartan combination in patients with chronic heart failure and sleep apnoea syndrome: the ENTRESTO‐SAS study design Full Text available with Trip Pro

Impact of sacubitril–valsartan combination in patients with chronic heart failure and sleep apnoea syndrome: the ENTRESTO‐SAS study design Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a highly prevalent co-morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and can play a detrimental role in the pathophysiology course of CHF. However, the best way to manage SDB in CHF remains a matter of debate. Sacubitril-valsartan has been included in the 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines (...) as an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors to further reduce the risk of progression of CHF, CHF hospitalization, and death in ambulatory patients. Sacubitril and valsartan are good candidates for correcting SDB of CHF patients because their known mechanisms of action are likely to counteract the pathophysiology of SDB in CHF.The ENTRESTO-SAS trial is a 3-month, multicentric, prospective, open-label real-life cohort study. Patients eligible for sacubitril-valsartan treatment (i.e. adults

2018 ESC heart failure Controlled trial quality: uncertain

14. Insights into implementation of sacubitril/valsartan into clinical practice Full Text available with Trip Pro

Insights into implementation of sacubitril/valsartan into clinical practice Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced heart failure hospitalization and mortality in PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor With an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure). However, real-world data from its use are lacking.We retrospectively assessed all baseline and follow-up data of consecutive heart (...) failure patients with reduced ejection fraction receiving therapy with sacubitril/valsartan for Class I recommendation between December 2016 and July 2017. Baseline characteristics and dose titration of sacubitril/valsartan were compared between patients in clinical practice and in PARADIGM-HF. A total of 120 patients (81% male) were switched from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker to sacubitril/valsartan. A total of 20.1% of patients received dose uptitration

2018 ESC heart failure Controlled trial quality: uncertain

15. Eligibility of sacubitril–valsartan in a real‐world heart failure population: a community‐based single‐centre study Full Text available with Trip Pro

Eligibility of sacubitril–valsartan in a real‐world heart failure population: a community‐based single‐centre study This study aims to investigate the eligibility of the Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) with ACE inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) study to a real-world heart failure population.Medical records of all heart failure patients living within the catchment area of Umeå (...) University Hospital were reviewed. This district consists of around 150 000 people. Out of 2029 patients with a diagnosis of heart failure, 1924 (95%) had at least one echocardiography performed, and 401 patients had an ejection fraction of ≤35% at their latest examination. The major PARADIGM-HF criteria were applied, and 95 patients fulfilled all enrolment criteria and thus were eligible for sacubitril-valsartan. This corresponds to 5% of the overall heart failure population and 24% of the population

2018 ESC heart failure

16. The impact of a dose of the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan on post‐myocardial infarction ventricular remodelling Full Text available with Trip Pro

The impact of a dose of the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan on post‐myocardial infarction ventricular remodelling Although clinical guidelines advocate the use of the highest tolerated dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers after acute myocardial infarction (MI), the optimal dosing or the risk-benefit profile of different doses have not been fully identified.In this multicentre trial, 495 Korean patients with acute ST segment elevation MI (...) and subnormal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (<50%) were randomly allocated (2:1) to receive maximal tolerated dose of valsartan (titrated up to 320 mg/day, n = 333) or low-dose valsartan (80 mg/day, n = 162) treatment. The primary objective was to assess the changes in echocardiographic parameters of LV remodelling from baseline to 12 months after discharge. After treatment, end-diastolic LV volume (LVEDV) decreased significantly in the low-dose group, but the difference in LVEDV changes

2018 ESC heart failure Controlled trial quality: uncertain

17. Safety and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

Safety and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation

2018 PROSPERO

18. Efficacy and safety of sacubutril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure

Efficacy and safety of sacubutril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Timing and effect

2018 PROSPERO

19. Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Physical and Social Activity Limitations in Patients With Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Physical and Social Activity Limitations in Patients With Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with heart failure is markedly reduced compared with that in patients with other chronic diseases, demonstrating substantial limitations in physical and social activities. In the Prospective Comparison of ARNI With an ACE-Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart (...) Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial, sacubitril/valsartan improved overall HRQL compared with enalapril, as determined by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).To examine the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on physical and social activities.The PARADIGM-HF trial was a randomized, double-blind, active treatment-controlled clinical trial performed from December 8, 2009, to March 31, 2014, in 8399 patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV disease and a left ventricular ejection

2018 JAMA cardiology Controlled trial quality: predicted high

20. Rationale and design of TRANSITION: a randomized trial of pre‐discharge vs. post‐discharge initiation of sacubitril/valsartan Full Text available with Trip Pro

Rationale and design of TRANSITION: a randomized trial of pre‐discharge vs. post‐discharge initiation of sacubitril/valsartan The prognosis after hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains poor, especially <30 days post-discharge. Evidence-based medications with prognostic impact administered at discharge improve survival and hospital readmission, but robust studies comparing pre-discharge with post-discharge initiation are rare. The PARADIGM-HF trial established (...) sacubitril/valsartan as a new evidence-based therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<40%) (rEF). In common with other landmark studies, it enrolled patients who were ambulatory at the time of inclusion. In addition, there is also still limited knowledge of initiation and up-titration of sacubitril/valsartan in ACEi/ARB- naïve patients and in de novo HF with rEF patients.TRANSITION is a multicentre, open-label study in which ~1000 adults hospitalized

2017 ESC heart failure Controlled trial quality: uncertain