Latest & greatest articles for sedation

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on sedation or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on sedation and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for sedation

3. Vomiting is the most common adverse effect among children and young people sedated for emergency procedures

Vomiting is the most common adverse effect among children and young people sedated for emergency procedures Signal - Vomiting is the most common adverse effect among children and young people sedated for emergency procedures Dissemination Centre Discover Portal NIHR DC Discover Vomiting is the most common adverse effect among children and young people sedated for emergency procedures Published on 27 September 2016 Vomiting is the most common adverse event when sedating a child or young person (...) undergoing a procedure in the emergency department, occurring in 55.5 out of 1,000 cases. Agitation occurred in 17.9/1,000 cases, and hypoxia – lack of oxygen – in 14.8 out of 1,000 cases. Serious breathing problems needing intervention to provide ventilation were rare, but highlight the need for experienced staff when giving sedation to children. This systematic review included 41 studies, six of which were UK-based. It pooled the frequency of adverse events when using different sedation drugs, alone

NIHR Dissemination Centre2018

4. Sedation during minimal invasive surfactant therapy: a randomised controlled trial

Sedation during minimal invasive surfactant therapy: a randomised controlled trial 30068669 2018 08 02 1468-2052 2018 Aug 01 Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. Sedation during minimal invasive surfactant therapy: a randomised controlled trial. fetalneonatal-2018-315015 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315015 Although sedation for endotracheal intubation of infants is widely adopted, there is no consensus whether sedation should be used (...) for minimal invasive surfactant therapy (MIST). We compared, in a randomised controlled setting, the level of stress and comfort of preterm infants during MIST with and without receiving low-dose sedation. Infants between 26 and 36 weeks gestational age were randomised to receive either low-dose sedation (1 mg/kg propofol intravenous) or no premedication during MIST procedure. Standard comfort care was given in both groups, which consisted of administering sucrose in the cheek pouch of the infant

EvidenceUpdates2018

5. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Procedural Amnesia and Respiratory Depression Between Moderate and Deep Sedation With Propofol in the Emergency Department

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Procedural Amnesia and Respiratory Depression Between Moderate and Deep Sedation With Propofol in the Emergency Department 30098230 2018 09 24 1553-2712 2018 Aug 11 Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Acad Emerg Med Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Procedural Amnesia and Respiratory Depression Between Moderate and Deep Sedation With Propofol in the Emergency Department. 10.1111/acem.13548 (...) The objective was to determine if there is a difference in procedural amnesia and adverse respiratory events (AREs) between the target sedation levels of moderate (MS) and deep (DS) procedural sedation. This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial of consenting adult patients planning to undergo DS with propofol between March 5, 2015, and May 24, 2017. Patients were randomized to a target sedation level of MS or DS using the American Society of Anesthesiologist's definitions. Drug doses, vital signs

EvidenceUpdates2018

6. Effect of Depth of Sedation in Older Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Repair on Postoperative Delirium: The STRIDE Randomized Clinical Trial

Effect of Depth of Sedation in Older Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Repair on Postoperative Delirium: The STRIDE Randomized Clinical Trial 30090923 2018 08 09 2168-6262 2018 Aug 08 JAMA surgery JAMA Surg Effect of Depth of Sedation in Older Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Repair on Postoperative Delirium: The STRIDE Randomized Clinical Trial. 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2602 Postoperative delirium is the most common complication following major surgery in older patients. Intraoperative sedation (...) levels are a possible modifiable risk factor for postoperative delirium. To determine whether limiting sedation levels during spinal anesthesia reduces incident delirium overall. This double-blind randomized clinical trial (A Strategy to Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Delirum in Elderly Patients [STRIDE]) was conducted from November 18, 2011, to May 19, 2016, at a single academic medical center and included a consecutive sample of older patients (≥65 years) who were undergoing nonelective hip

EvidenceUpdates2018

7. Intraoperative Sedation With Dexmedetomidine is Superior to Propofol for Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Intraoperative Sedation With Dexmedetomidine is Superior to Propofol for Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study 29528863 2018 08 01 1536-5409 34 9 2018 Sep The Clinical journal of pain Clin J Pain Intraoperative Sedation With Dexmedetomidine is Superior to Propofol for Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. 811-817 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000605 Peripheral nerve block is a preferable method (...) for elderly patients receiving hip arthroplasty. Sedation with dexmedetomidine may reduce postoperative delirium (POD). The aim of this study was to investigate whether intraoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine, as a supplementary to peripheral nerve block for elderly patients receiving total hip arthroplasty, can decrease the prevalence of POD. A prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted with patients 65 years of age or older who underwent total hip arthroplasty between June 2016 and June

EvidenceUpdates2018

9. Comparison of Intraoperative Sedation With Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol on Acute Postoperative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial

Comparison of Intraoperative Sedation With Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol on Acute Postoperative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial 29624535 2018 04 06 1526-7598 2018 Apr 05 Anesthesia and analgesia Anesth. Analg. Comparison of Intraoperative Sedation With Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol on Acute Postoperative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003315 In patients undergoing total knee (...) arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia, we compared the postoperative analgesic effect of intraoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine versus propofol. We hypothesized that sedation with dexmedetomidine would result in lower postoperative opioid analgesic consumption than with propofol. Forty-eight patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either a dexmedetomidine group (n = 24), which received a loading dose of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.5

EvidenceUpdates2018

10. Use of Anesthesia Providers in the Administration of Office-based Deep Sedation/General Anesthesia to the Pediatric Dental Patient

Use of Anesthesia Providers in the Administration of Office-based Deep Sedation/General Anesthesia to the Pediatric Dental Patient

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry2018

11. Sedation

Sedation Top results for sedation - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Turning Research Into Practice My query is: English Français Deutsch Čeština Español Magyar Svenska ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing (...) the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Latest & greatest articles for sedation The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines

Trip Latest and Greatest2018

13. Vomiting is the most common adverse effect among children and young people sedated for emergency procedures

Vomiting is the most common adverse effect among children and young people sedated for emergency procedures NIHR DC | Signal - Vomiting is the most common adverse effect among children and young people sedated for emergency procedures Dissemination Centre Discover Portal NIHR DC Discover NIHR Signal Vomiting is the most common adverse effect among children and young people sedated for emergency procedures Published on 27 September 2016 Vomiting is the most common adverse event when sedating (...) a child or young person undergoing a procedure in the emergency department, occurring in 55.5 out of 1,000 cases. Agitation occurred in 17.9/1,000 cases, and hypoxia – lack of oxygen – in 14.8 out of 1,000 cases. Serious breathing problems needing intervention to provide ventilation were rare, but highlight the need for experienced staff when giving sedation to children. This systematic review included 41 studies, six of which were UK-based. It pooled the frequency of adverse events when using

NIHR Dissemination Centre2018

15. Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia

Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia 2018:A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Dental Association, American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists, and Society of Interventional Radiology* | Anesthesiology | ASA Publications (...) 2568626736 ASA Publications Log in to access full content You must be logged in to access this feature. ASA members enjoy complimentary access to ASA publications, as well as a variety of educational resources. Non-ASA Members Login Free Practice Parameter | March 2018 Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia 2018: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial

American Society of Anesthesiologists2018

16. Long-term Outcomes After Protocolized Sedation vs Usual Care in Ventilated Pediatric Patients

Long-term Outcomes After Protocolized Sedation vs Usual Care in Ventilated Pediatric Patients PEDSCCM.org Criteria abstracted from series in Review Posted: founded 1995 Questions or comments?

PedsCCM Evidence-Based Journal Club2018

17. Practice Patterns and Outcomes Associated With Early Sedation Depth in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Practice Patterns and Outcomes Associated With Early Sedation Depth in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 29227367 2017 12 24 1530-0293 2017 Dec 08 Critical care medicine Crit. Care Med. Practice Patterns and Outcomes Associated With Early Sedation Depth in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002885 Emerging data suggest that early deep sedation may negatively impact clinical outcomes (...) . This systematic review and meta-analysis defines and quantifies the impact of deep sedation within 48 hours of initiation of mechanical ventilation, as described in the world's literature. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital and ICU lengths of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and delirium and tracheostomy frequency. The following data sources were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews

EvidenceUpdates2018

18. Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Endoscopies: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines

Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Endoscopies: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Endoscopies: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines | CADTH.ca Find the information you need Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Endoscopies: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Endoscopies: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines Published (...) on: November 14, 2017 Project Number: RB1157-000 Product Line: Research Type: Drug Report Type: Summary of Abstracts Result type: Report Question What is the comparative clinical effectiveness of propofol versus fentanyl or midazolam for conscious sedation during endoscopy procedures? What is the cost-effectiveness of propofol versus fentanyl or midazolam for conscious sedation during endoscopy procedures? What are the evidence-based guidelines for the use of propofol for conscious sedation during

Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Rapid Review2017

19. Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.

Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children. BACKGROUND: Paediatric neurodiagnostic investigations, including brain neuroimaging and electroencephalography (EEG), play an important role in the assessment of neurodevelopmental disorders. The use of an appropriate sedative agent is important to ensure the successful completion of the neurodiagnostic procedures, particularly in children, who are usually unable to remain still throughout the procedure. OBJECTIVES (...) , with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MAIN RESULTS: We included 13 studies with a total of 2390 children. The studies were all conducted in hospitals that provided neurodiagnostic services. Most studies assessed the proportion of sedation failure during the neurodiagnostic procedure, time for adequate sedation, and potential adverse effects associated with the sedative agent.The methodological quality of the included studies was mixed, as reflected by a wide variation in their 'Risk of bias' profiles

Cochrane2017

20. Risk Factors for Adverse Events in Emergency Department Procedural Sedation for Children

Risk Factors for Adverse Events in Emergency Department Procedural Sedation for Children 28828486 2017 08 22 2017 10 06 2017 10 06 2168-6211 171 10 2017 Oct 01 JAMA pediatrics JAMA Pediatr Risk Factors for Adverse Events in Emergency Department Procedural Sedation for Children. 957-964 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2135 Procedural sedation for children undergoing painful procedures is standard practice in emergency departments worldwide. Previous studies of emergency department sedation (...) are limited by their single-center design and are underpowered to identify risk factors for serious adverse events (SAEs), thereby limiting their influence on sedation practice and patient outcomes. To examine the incidence and risk factors associated with sedation-related SAEs. This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was conducted in 6 pediatric emergency departments in Canada between July 10, 2010, and February 28, 2015. Children 18 years or younger who received sedation for a painful

EvidenceUpdates2017