Latest & greatest articles for screening

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on screening or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on screening and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for screening

61. Continuation of Annual Screening Mammography and Breast Cancer Mortality in Women Older Than 70 Years. (Abstract)

Continuation of Annual Screening Mammography and Breast Cancer Mortality in Women Older Than 70 Years. Randomized trials have shown that initiating breast cancer screening between ages 50 and 69 years and continuing it for 10 years decreases breast cancer mortality. However, no trials have studied whether or when women can safely stop screening mammography. An estimated 52% of women aged 75 years or older undergo screening mammography in the United States.To estimate the effect of breast cancer (...) screening on breast cancer mortality in Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 to 84 years.Large-scale, population-based, observational study of 2 screening strategies: continuing annual mammography, and stopping screening.U.S. Medicare program, 2000 to 2008.1 058 013 beneficiaries aged 70 to 84 years who had a life expectancy of at least 10 years, had no previous breast cancer diagnosis, and underwent screening mammography.Eight-year breast cancer mortality, incidence, and treatments, plus the positive

2020 Annals of Internal Medicine

62. Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adolescents and Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adolescents and Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common chronic blood-borne pathogen in the US and a leading cause of complications from chronic liver disease. HCV is associated with more deaths than the top 60 other reportable infectious diseases combined, including HIV. Cases of acute HCV infection have increased approximately 3.8-fold over the last decade because of increasing (...) injection drug use and improved surveillance.To update its 2013 recommendation, the USPSTF commissioned a review of the evidence on screening for HCV infection in adolescents and adults.This recommendation applies to all asymptomatic adults aged 18 to 79 years without known liver disease.The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for HCV infection in adults aged 18 to 79 years has substantial net benefit.The USPSTF recommends screening for HCV infection in adults aged 18 to 79 years. (B

2020 JAMA

63. Cervical screening: ideas for improving access and uptake

Cervical screening: ideas for improving access and uptake Cervical screening: ideas for improving access and uptake - GOV.UK Tell us whether you accept cookies We use about how you use GOV.UK. We use this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve government services. Accept all cookies You’ve accepted all cookies. You can at any time. Hide Search Guidance Cervical screening: ideas for improving access and uptake Guidance to help primary care, commissioners and local (...) authorities plan and evaluate initiatives around cervical screening coverage in their area. Published 3 March 2020 From: Contents The following initiatives can be used to address areas of low coverage identified in the cervical screening quarterly coverage data reports. Invitation letter Evidence demonstrates that GP endorsement has a positive effect on cervical screening uptake. The cervical screening programme sends a standard invitation letter and a reminder letter 18 weeks later to women who

2020 Public Health England

64. Role of gastrointestinal endoscopy in the screening of digestive tract cancers in Europ

Role of gastrointestinal endoscopy in the screening of digestive tract cancers in Europ Position Statement Role of gastrointestinal endoscopy in the screening of digestive tract cancers in Europe: European Societyof Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement Authors AdrianSaftoiu 1,2 ,CesareHassan 3 ,MiguelAreia 4,5 ,ManoopS. Bhutani 6 ,RafBisschops 7 ,ErwanBories 8 ,IrinaM. Cazacu 1,6 ,EvelienDekker 9 , PierreH.Deprez 10 ,StephenP.Pereira 11 ,CarloSenore 12 ,RiccardoCapocaccia 13 (...) 10 Departmentof Hepato-Gastroenterology,Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium 11 Institutefor Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London, UK 12 Epidemiology and Screening Unit-CPO, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy 13 Editorial Board, Epidemiologia e Prevenzione 14 III Med Klinik, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany 15 Departmentof Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud

2020 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

65. Evidence-based Canadian guidelines for tele-retina screening for diabetic retinopathy: recommendations from the Canadian Retina Research Network (CR2N) Tele-Retina Steering Committee

Evidence-based Canadian guidelines for tele-retina screening for diabetic retinopathy: recommendations from the Canadian Retina Research Network (CR2N) Tele-Retina Steering Committee ClinicalKey

2020 CPG Infobase

66. Shared follow-up and survivorship care for low-risk endometrial cancer: Screening, assessment and management of supportive care needs of women with low-risk endometrial cancer

Shared follow-up and survivorship care for low-risk endometrial cancer: Screening, assessment and management of supportive care needs of women with low-risk endometrial cancer canceraustralia.gov.au Screening, assessment and management of supportive care needs of women with low-risk endometrial cancer This resource is for all members of the multidisciplinary shared care team. It provides guidance on the screening, assessment and management of supportive care needs of women affected by low-risk (...) . Screening, assessing and managing the effects of treatment, co-morbidities and secondary prevention are important aspects of a holistic and multidisciplinary approach to managing follow-up care for women with low-risk endometrial cancer. Referral to appropriate health providers is required to meet the identified needs of the woman, her carer and family. SHARED FOLLOW-UP AND SURVIVORSHIP CARE FOR LOW-RISK ENDOMETRIAL CANCER * Evidence suggests that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death

2020 Cancer Australia

67. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening. Improved screening methods for women with dense breasts are needed because of their increased risk of breast cancer and of failed early diagnosis by screening mammography.To compare the screening performance of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in women with dense breasts.Cross-sectional (...) study with longitudinal follow-up at 48 academic, community hospital, and private practice sites in the United States and Germany, conducted between December 2016 and November 2017 among average-risk women aged 40 to 75 years with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts undergoing routine screening. Follow-up ascertainment of cancer diagnoses was complete through September 12, 2019.All women underwent screening by both DBT and abbreviated breast MRI, performed in randomized order and read

2020 JAMA

68. Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Dementia (also known as major neurocognitive disorder) is defined by a significant decline in 1 or more cognitive domains that interferes with a person's independence in daily activities. Dementia affects an estimated 2.4 to 5.5 million individuals in the United States, and its prevalence increases with age.To update its 2014 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (...) (USPSTF) commissioned a review of the evidence on screening for cognitive impairment, including mild cognitive impairment and mild to moderate dementia, in community-dwelling adults, including those 65 years or older residing in independent living facilities.This recommendation applies to community-dwelling older adults 65 years or older, without recognized signs or symptoms of cognitive impairment.The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is lacking, and the balance of benefits and harms of screening

2020 JAMA

69. Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries. The WHO Director-General has issued a call for action to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem. To help inform global efforts, we modelled potential human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and cervical screening scenarios in low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) to examine the feasibility and timing (...) of elimination at different thresholds, and to estimate the number of cervical cancer cases averted on the path to elimination.The WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Modelling Consortium (CCEMC), which consists of three independent transmission-dynamic models identified by WHO according to predefined criteria, projected reductions in cervical cancer incidence over time in 78 LMICs for three standardised base-case scenarios: girls-only vaccination; girls-only vaccination and once-lifetime screening; and girls

2020 Lancet

70. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial. (Abstract)

Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial. There are limited data from randomized trials regarding whether volume-based, low-dose computed tomographic (CT) screening can reduce lung-cancer mortality among male former and current smokers.A total of 13,195 men (primary analysis) and 2594 women (subgroup analyses) between the ages of 50 and 74 were randomly assigned to undergo CT screening at T0 (baseline), year 1, year 3, and year 5.5 or no screening. We (...) obtained data on cancer diagnosis and the date and cause of death through linkages with national registries in the Netherlands and Belgium, and a review committee confirmed lung cancer as the cause of death when possible. A minimum follow-up of 10 years until December 31, 2015, was completed for all participants.Among men, the average adherence to CT screening was 90.0%. On average, 9.2% of the screened participants underwent at least one additional CT scan (initially indeterminate). The overall

2020 NEJM

71. ASGE guideline on screening and surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus

ASGE guideline on screening and surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus GUIDELINE ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis Prepared by: ASGE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE COMMITTEE James L. Buxbaum, MD, FASGE, 1 Syed M. Abbas Fehmi, MD, MSc, FASGE, 2 Shahnaz Sultan, MD, MHSc, 3,4,5 Douglas S. Fishman, MD, FAAP, FASGE, 6 Bashar J. Qumseya, MD, MPH, 7 Victoria K. Cortessis, PhD, 1 Hannah Schilperoort, MLIS, MA, 8 Lynn Kysh, MLIS, 8 Lea Matsuoka, MD, FACS

2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

72. Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Full Text available with Trip Pro

Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Welcome to the new PubMed. For legacy PubMed (...) collection Name your collection: Name must be less than 100 characters Choose a collection: Unable to load your collection due to an error Add Cancel Add to My Bibliography My Bibliography Unable to load your delegates due to an error Add Cancel Actions Cite Share Permalink Copy Page navigation JAMA Netw Open Actions , 2 (12), e1917676 2019 Dec 2 Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical

2020 EvidenceUpdates

73. Designing an effective and efficient case identification, screening and assessment process

Designing an effective and efficient case identification, screening and assessment process NHS England » Designing an effective and efficient case identification, screening and assessment process Search Search Menu Designing an effective and efficient case identification, screening and assessment process Document first published: 22 January 2020 Page updated: 22 January 2020 Topic: Publication type: Document PDF 594 KB

2020 NHS England

74. Alcohol-related trauma reinjury prevention with hospital-based screening in adult populations Full Text available with Trip Pro

Alcohol-related trauma reinjury prevention with hospital-based screening in adult populations Alcohol-related trauma reinjury prevention with hospital-based screening in adult populations - Practice Management Guideline Search » Alcohol-related trauma reinjury prevention with hospital-based screening in adult populations Published 2020 Citation: Authors Kodadek, Lisa M. MD; Freeman, Jennifer J. MD; Tiwary, Devesh MD; Drake, Mack Dillon DO; Schroeder, M. Elizabeth MD; Dultz, Linda MD, MPH; White (...) , January 18, 2019 in Austin, Texas. Address for reprints: Lisa M. Kodadek, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 21st Ave, South Suite 404, Medical Arts Building Nashville, TN 37212; email: ; . Online date: September 5, 2019 BACKGROUND Unaddressed alcohol use among injured patients may result in recurrent injury or death. Many trauma centers incorporate alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for injured patients with alcohol use disorders, but systematic reviews

2020 Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

75. Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Breast Cancer

Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Breast Cancer Breast Cancer: Community Health Workers | The Community Guide Welcome to The Community Guide! Let us know what you think of the website by completing this . Open Navigation or Search form Search Search The Community Guide You are here » Systematic Review Topic Recommended (strong evidence) April 2019 Audience Adults Low-income Population Women Setting Clinical/Health Systems Community Home Strategy Health (...) Education Screening Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Breast Cancer Tabs Snapshot Summary of CPSTF Finding The interventions that engage community health workers to increase screening for breast cancer by mammography. Evidence shows these interventions increase breast cancer screening rates when community health workers deliver them independently or as part of an implementation team. Interventions that engage community health workers to increase breast cancer screening

2020 Community Preventive Services Task Force

76. Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Cervical Cancer

Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Cervical Cancer Cervical Cancer: Community Health Workers | The Community Guide Welcome to The Community Guide! Let us know what you think of the website by completing this . Open Navigation or Search form Search Search The Community Guide You are here » Systematic Review Topic Recommended (strong evidence) April 2019 Audience Adults Low-income Population Women Setting Clinical/Health Systems Community Home Strategy Health (...) Education Screening Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Cervical Cancer Tabs Snapshot Summary of CPSTF Finding The interventions that engage community health workers to increase screening for cervical cancer by Pap smear. Evidence shows these interventions increase cervical cancer screening rates when community health workers deliver them independently or as part of an implementation team. In addition, economic evidence shows these interventions are cost-effective

2020 Community Preventive Services Task Force

77. Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Colorectal Cancer

Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Cancer: Community Health Workers | The Community Guide Welcome to The Community Guide! Let us know what you think of the website by completing this . Open Navigation or Search form Search Search The Community Guide You are here » Systematic Review Topic Recommended (strong evidence) April 2019 Audience Adults Low-income Population Setting Clinical/Health Systems Community Home Strategy Health (...) Education Screening Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Colorectal Cancer Tabs Snapshot Summary of CPSTF Finding The interventions that engage community health workers to increase screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or fecal occult blood test [FOBT]. Evidence shows these interventions increase colorectal cancer screening rates when community health workers deliver them independently or as part of an implementation team. Interventions that engage community

2020 Community Preventive Services Task Force

78. Screening and brief interventions for adolescent alcohol use disorders presenting through emergency departments: a research programme including two RCTs Full Text available with Trip Pro

Screening and brief interventions for adolescent alcohol use disorders presenting through emergency departments: a research programme including two RCTs Screening and brief interventions for adolescent alcohol use disorders presenting through emergency departments: a research programme including two RCTs Journals Library An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again. >> >> >> Page Not Found Page not found (404) Sorry - the page you requested could not be found. Please choose (...) a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need. >> >> >> >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }} Toolkit 1)"> 0)"> 1)"> {{metadata.Title}} {{metadata.Headline}} This research programme evaluated personalised feedback with either brief advice or electronic brief intervention, and neither reduced consumption compared with screening alone at 12 months in 14- to 17-year-olds. {{author}} {{($index , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & . Paolo Deluca 1, * , Simon Coulton 2

2020 NIHR HTA programme

79. Yield of a Public Health Screening of Children for Islet Autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany. (Abstract)

Yield of a Public Health Screening of Children for Islet Autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany. Public health screening for type 1 diabetes in its presymptomatic stages may reduce disease severity and burden on a population level.To determine the prevalence of presymptomatic type 1 diabetes in children participating in a public health screening program for islet autoantibodies and the risk for progression to clinical diabetes.Screening for islet autoantibodies was offered to children aged 1.75 (...) type 1 diabetes, defined by 2 or more islet autoantibodies, with categorization into stages 1 (normoglycemia), 2 (dysglycemia), or 3 (clinical) type 1 diabetes. Secondary outcomes were the frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis and parental psychological stress, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (range, 0-27; higher scores indicate worse depression; ≤4 indicates no to minimal depression; >20 indicates severe depression).Of 90 632 children screened (median [interquartile range {IQR}] age

2020 JAMA

80. Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines. (Abstract)

Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines. The European Commission Initiative for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis guidelines (European Breast Guidelines) are coordinated by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre. The target audience for the guidelines includes women, health professionals, and policymakers.An international guideline panel of 28 multidisciplinary members, including patients, developed questions and corresponding (...) of the European Breast Guidelines provides recommendations regarding organized screening programs for women aged 40 to 75 years who are at average risk. The recommendations address digital mammography screening and the addition of hand-held ultrasonography, automated breast ultrasonography, or magnetic resonance imaging compared with mammography alone. The recommendations also discuss the frequency of screening and inform decision making for women at average risk who are recalled for suspicious lesions or who

2020 Annals of Internal Medicine