Latest & greatest articles for rosuvastatin

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on rosuvastatin or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on rosuvastatin and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for rosuvastatin

1. Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin in comparison with generic atorvastatin and simvastatin in a Swedish population at high risk of cardiovascular events (Full text)

Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin in comparison with generic atorvastatin and simvastatin in a Swedish population at high risk of cardiovascular events Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin in comparison with generic atorvastatin and simvastatin in a Swedish population at high risk of cardiovascular events Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin in comparison with generic atorvastatin and simvastatin in a Swedish population at high risk of cardiovascular events Gandhi SK, Jensen MM, Fox KM, Smolen L (...) concluded that rosuvastatin was cost-effective, over a lifetime, compared with generic simvastatin or atorvastatin. The lack of detailed reporting and the highlighted limitations to this study mean that the authors’ conclusions should be considered with caution. Type of economic evaluation Cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis Study objective This study evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of alternative statin therapies in Swedish patients with a high risk of cardiovascular events

2012 NHS Economic Evaluation Database. PubMed abstract

2. Rosuvastatin

Rosuvastatin Top results for rosuvastatin - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Liberating the literature ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2 (...) ) and (#3 or #4) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Latest & greatest articles for rosuvastatin The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms

2018 Trip Latest and Greatest

3. Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin 20mg for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: a Swedish economic evaluation of the JUPITER trial

Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin 20mg for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: a Swedish economic evaluation of the JUPITER trial Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin 20mg for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: a Swedish economic evaluation of the JUPITER trial Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin 20mg for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: a Swedish economic evaluation of the JUPITER trial Ohsfeldt RL, Olsson AG, Jensen MM (...) , Gandhi SK, Paulsson T Record Status This is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Each abstract contains a brief summary of the methods, the results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the study and the conclusions drawn. CRD summary The study examined cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin for primary prevention of major cardiovascular disease for various risk levels. The authors concluded that primary

2012 NHS Economic Evaluation Database.

4. Randomised controlled trial: In individuals at intermediate risk for cardiovascular disease, treatment with rosuvastatin but not candesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide lowers cardiovascular disease event rates

Randomised controlled trial: In individuals at intermediate risk for cardiovascular disease, treatment with rosuvastatin but not candesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide lowers cardiovascular disease event rates In individuals at intermediate risk for cardiovascular disease, treatment with rosuvastatin but not candesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide lowers cardiovascular disease event rates | BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising (...) In individuals at intermediate risk for cardiovascular disease, treatment with rosuvastatin but not candesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide lowers cardiovascular disease event rates Article Text Therapeutics/Prevention Randomised controlled trial In individuals at intermediate risk for cardiovascular disease, treatment with rosuvastatin but not candesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide lowers cardiovascular disease event rates Michael LeFevre Statistics from Altmetric.com Commentary on: Lonn EM , Bosch J , López

2016 Evidence-Based Medicine

5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin from a Canadian health system perspective

Cost-effectiveness analysis of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin from a Canadian health system perspective Cost-effectiveness analysis of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin from a Canadian health system perspective Cost-effectiveness analysis of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin from a Canadian health system perspective Costa-Scharplatz M, Ramanathan K, Frial T, Beamer B, Gandhi S Record Status (...) This is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Each abstract contains a brief summary of the methods, the results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the study and the conclusions drawn. CRD summary The objective was to examine the cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin in comparison with atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin for managing lipid parameters in patients with hypercholesterolaemia. The authors

2008 NHS Economic Evaluation Database.

6. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in high-risk Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomised, double blind, active-controlled study. (Abstract)

Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in high-risk Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomised, double blind, active-controlled study. To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in a high-risk Chinese population with hypercholesterolemia.This 6 week, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, active-controlled study randomized adult Chinese patients (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] ≥ 130 (...) -<250 mg/dL statin-naive and ≥100-<160 mg/dL in statin treated) to receive rosuvastatin (5 mg or 10 mg) or atorvastatin 10 mg. Patients not achieving National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III LDL-C targets in the randomized phase were administered rosuvastatin 10 mg and 20 mg in the open-label phase.In total 414 patients (mean age: 59.5 ± 9.51 years, 59.4% females, mean LDL-C: 4.242 ± 0.676 mmol/L (rosuvastatin 5 mg), 4.13 ± 0.682 mmol/L (rosuvastatin 10 mg

2017 Current medical research and opinion Controlled trial quality: uncertain

7. Rosuvastatin and the JUPITER trial. A critical appraisal

Rosuvastatin and the JUPITER trial. A critical appraisal Volumen 18. DTB: Vol 18, No 5. November - December 2010 - navarra.es Castellano | Euskara | Français | English Use the search tool! Search engine : : : : : : DTB: Vol 18, No 5. November - December 2010 DTB: Vol 18, No 5. November - December 2010 Content tools Share it Rosuvastatin and the JUPITER trial. A critical appraisal The role of hs-CRP in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis still remains unclear. It should not be used

2011 Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin of Navarre (Spain)

8. Association of Lipoproteins, Insulin Resistance, and Rosuvastatin With Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus : Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. (Full text)

Association of Lipoproteins, Insulin Resistance, and Rosuvastatin With Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus : Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Statins decrease levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglycerides as well as cardiovascular events but increase the risk for a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The risk factors associated with incident T2DM are incompletely characterized.To investigate the association of lipoprotein subclasses and size and a novel (...) levels less than 500 mg/dL. Those with T2DM were excluded. A prespecified secondary aim was to assess the effect of rosuvastatin calcium on T2DM. Incident T2DM was monitored for a median of 2.0 years. Data were collected from February 4, 2003, to August 20, 2008, and analyzed (intention-to-treat) from December 1, 2013, to January 21, 2016.Rosuvastatin calcium, 20 mg/d, or placebo.Size and concentration of lipids, apolipoproteins, and lipoproteins at baseline (11 918 patients with evaluable plasma

2016 JAMA cardiology Controlled trial quality: predicted high PubMed abstract

9. Comparison of effects of atorvastatin (20 mg) versus rosuvastatin (10 mg) therapy on mild coronary atherosclerotic plaques (from the ARTMAP trial). (Abstract)

Comparison of effects of atorvastatin (20 mg) versus rosuvastatin (10 mg) therapy on mild coronary atherosclerotic plaques (from the ARTMAP trial). High-dose rosuvastatin induces regression of coronary atherosclerosis, but it remains uncertain whether usual-dose statin has similar effects. We compared the effects of atorvastatin 20 mg/day versus rosuvastatin 10 mg/day on mild coronary atherosclerotic plaques (20% to 50% luminal narrowing and lesion length >10 mm) using intravascular ultrasound (...) (IVUS). Three hundred fifty statin-naive patients with mild coronary atherosclerotic plaques were randomized to receive atorvastatin 20 mg/day or rosuvastatin 10 mg/day. IVUS examinations were performed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Primary end point was percent change in total atheroma volume (TAV) defined as (TAV at 6 months - TAV at baseline)/(TAV at baseline) × 100. Evaluable IVUS was obtained for 271 patients (atorvastatin in 143, rosuvastatin in 128). Clinical characteristics, lipid

2012 The American journal of cardiology Controlled trial quality: uncertain

10. A randomized, controlled comparison of different intensive lipid-lowering therapies in Chinese patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS): Ezetimibe and rosuvastatin versus high-dose rosuvastatin. (Abstract)

A randomized, controlled comparison of different intensive lipid-lowering therapies in Chinese patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS): Ezetimibe and rosuvastatin versus high-dose rosuvastatin. Statin combined with ezetimibe demonstrates significant benefit in lowering low density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular events abroad, but whether intermediate intensity statins combined with ezetimibe is superior to high-intensity statin monotherapy in Chinese (...) people is unknown.A total of 125 patients were randomly assigned to a intermediate intensity rosuvastatin group (rosuvastatin 10mg/d, n=42), high-dose rosuvastatin group (rosuvastatin 20mg/d, n=41) or combination therapy group (ezetimibe 10mg/d and rosuvastatin 10mg/d, n=42) with a 12-week follow-up. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved the 2011 ESC/EAS LDL-C goal <70mg/dL (1.8mmol/L) at week 12. Secondary end points included changes from baseline in lipids

2017 International journal of cardiology Controlled trial quality: uncertain

11. LDL cholesterol levels after switch from atorvastatin to rosuvastatin. (Abstract)

LDL cholesterol levels after switch from atorvastatin to rosuvastatin. Initial statin therapy may not always adequately reduce elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Although alternative therapies are available, switching to another statin may be beneficial, especially for those at highest risk of cardiovascular disease and events. This study examined changes in LDL-C levels following a switch from 40/80 mg of atorvastatin (ATV) to 20/40 mg of rosuvastatin (RSV

2017 Current medical research and opinion

12. Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events according to Framingham Risk Score in patients with elevated C-reactive protein

Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events according to Framingham Risk Score in patients with elevated C-reactive protein Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events according to Framingham Risk Score in patients with elevated C-reactive protein Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events according to Framingham Risk Score in patients with elevated C-reactive protein MacDonald (...) GP Record Status This is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Each abstract contains a brief summary of the methods, the results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the study and the conclusions drawn. CRD summary This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with different Framingham Risk Scores (FRSs

2010 NHS Economic Evaluation Database.

13. JUPITER randomised controlled trial: Rosuvastatin is similarly effective for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women as in men

JUPITER randomised controlled trial: Rosuvastatin is similarly effective for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women as in men Rosuvastatin is similarly effective for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women as in men | BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising to you. You can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our . Log in using (...) your username and password For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts Username * Password * your user name or password? Search for this keyword Search for this keyword Main menu Log in using your username and password For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts Username * Password * your user name or password? You are here Rosuvastatin is similarly effective for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women as in men Article Text Therapeutics JUPITER

2010 Evidence-Based Medicine

14. Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin and fluvastatin for the primary prevention of CHD in the UK

Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin and fluvastatin for the primary prevention of CHD in the UK Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin and fluvastatin for the primary prevention of CHD in the UK Cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin and fluvastatin for the primary prevention of CHD in the UK Davies A, Hutton J, O'Donnell J, Kingslake S Record Status This is a critical abstract (...) rosuvastatin (ROS), atorvastatin (ATO), simvastatin (SIM), pravastatin (PRA) and fluvastatin (FLU). Initial doses were 10 mg for ROS, ATO and SIM, 20 mg for PRA, and 40 mg for FLU. Patients who failed to reach the target cholesterol level with the initial dosage where titrated to the next highest dosage (20 and 40 mg for ROS and PRA, 20, 40 and 80 mg for ATO and SIM, and 40 and 80 mg for FLU). Type of intervention Primary prevention. Economic study type Cost-utility analysis. Study population The study

2006 NHS Economic Evaluation Database.

15. Which is safer atorvastatin or rosuvastatin in elderly kidney failure?

Which is safer atorvastatin or rosuvastatin in elderly kidney failure? Q&A - which statin can be use safely in kidney failure elderly? - Trip Database NEW! or use your Google+ account Turning Research Into Practice ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers (...) in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Asked 4 Sep 2019 · , Pharmacist, SA which statin can be use safely in kidney failure elderly? which is safer atorvastatin or rosuvastatin in elderly kidney failure? regards 1 Please log in to post a reply Your response: Reply Notes about answers If you see something you feel is wrong, don’t criticise

2019 Trip Community Q&A

16. The Effect of High Dose Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin on Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Patients with Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. (Abstract)

The Effect of High Dose Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin on Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Patients with Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of pretreatment with cilostazol and rosuvastatin combination before elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on peri-procedural myocardial injury (PPMIJ).We randomly assigned 172 patients with stable angina pectoris scheduled for elective PCI to pre- treatment with Cilostazol 200mg (...) and Rosuvastatin 40 mg (group 1), or to pretreatment with Rosuvastatin 40 mg group (group 2). The primary end-point was the occurrence of PPMIJ defined as any cardiac troponin I (Tn I) level elevated above the upper normal limit (UNL). The occurrence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (PPMIN) was defined as a post-procedural increase in cTnI level ≥ 5 times above the UNL.There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between group 1 (n = 86) and group 2 (n = 86). The rate of PPMIJ (21

2016 Zhonghua Minguo xin zang xue hui za zhi = Acta Cardiologica Sinica Controlled trial quality: uncertain

17. Short-Term Rosuvastatin Therapy for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. (Full text)

Short-Term Rosuvastatin Therapy for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rosuvastatin in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).CI-AKI is an important complication after contrast medium injection. While small studies have shown positive results with statin therapy, the role (...) of statin therapy in prevention of CI-AKI remains unknown.We randomized 2,998 patients with type 2 DM and concomitant CKD who were undergoing coronary/peripheral arterial angiography with or without percutaneous intervention to receive rosuvastatin, 10 mg/day (n = 1,498), for 5 days (2 days before, and 3 days after procedure) or standard-of-care (n = 1,500). Patients' renal function was assessed at baseline, 48 h, and 72 h after exposure to contrast medium. The primary endpoint of the study

2013 Journal of the American College of Cardiology Controlled trial quality: uncertain PubMed abstract

18. Comparative effectiveness of rosuvastatin versus other statins: a review of clinical effectiveness

Comparative effectiveness of rosuvastatin versus other statins: a review of clinical effectiveness Comparative effectiveness of rosuvastatin versus other statins: a review of clinical effectiveness Comparative effectiveness of rosuvastatin versus other statins: a review of clinical effectiveness Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality (...) of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Comparative effectiveness of rosuvastatin versus other statins: a review of clinical effectiveness. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). 2011 Authors' conclusions Evidence suggests that rosuvastatin has the most potent per milligram LDL lowering effect but with appropriate dosage adjustments different statins can provide equivalent LDL reductions. Data suggests

2011 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

19. A Comparative Study of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin in Patients With Hyperlipidemia

A Comparative Study of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin in Patients With Hyperlipidemia A Comparative Study of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin in Patients With Hyperlipidemia - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov Hide glossary Glossary Study record managers: refer to the if submitting registration or results information. Search for terms x × Study Record Detail Saved Studies Save this study Warning You have reached the maximum number of saved studies (100). Please remove one or more studies before (...) adding more. A Comparative Study of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin in Patients With Hyperlipidemia The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our for details. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02979704 Recruitment Status : Unknown Verified August 2016 by Samia Haque Tonu, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Recruitment

2016 Clinical Trials

20. Therapy with atorvastatin versus rosuvastatin reduces urinary podocytes, podocyte-associated molecules, and proximal tubule dysfunction biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study. (Full text)

Therapy with atorvastatin versus rosuvastatin reduces urinary podocytes, podocyte-associated molecules, and proximal tubule dysfunction biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study. Diabetic nephropathy is a severe complication of Type 2 diabetes. Tubular lesions may play an important role in its early stages. The aim of our study was to determine if atorvastatin protects the podocytes and the proximal tubule in patients with Type 2 diabetes.A total of 63 patients (...) with Type 2 diabetes completed this 6-months prospective pilot study. They were randomized to continue rosuvastatin therapy (control group) or to be administered an equipotent dose of atorvastatin (intervention group), and were assessed regarding urinary podocytes, podocyte-associated molecules, and biomarkers of proximal tubule dysfunction.The patients from the intervention group presented a significant reduction in podocyturia (from 7.0 to 4.0 cells/ml, p < .05), urinary nephrin (from 1.7 to 1.3 mg/g

2016 Renal failure Controlled trial quality: uncertain PubMed abstract