Latest & greatest articles for pneumonia

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on pneumonia or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on pneumonia and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for pneumonia

641. Case study: cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination against pneumococcal pneumonia

Case study: cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination against pneumococcal pneumonia Case study: cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination against pneumococcal pneumonia Case study: cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination against pneumococcal pneumonia Congress of the United States, Office of Technology Assessment Record Status This is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Each abstract contains a brief summary of the methods (...) , the results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the study and the conclusions drawn. Health technology Vaccination for pneumococcal pneumonia. Type of intervention Primary prevention Economic study type Cost-utility analysis. Study population Persons aged 2-4; age 5-24; age 25-44; age 45-64 and aged 65+ years. Setting The study was carried out in the USA. Dates to which data relate It seems that price relates to 1978. Source of effectiveness data Single study

NHS Economic Evaluation Database.1979

642. Cefazolin vs penicillin. Treatment of uncomplicated pneumococcal pneumonia.

Cefazolin vs penicillin. Treatment of uncomplicated pneumococcal pneumonia. 448844 1979 08 16 1979 08 16 2016 10 17 0098-7484 241 26 1979 Jun 29 JAMA JAMA Cefazolin vs penicillin. Treatment of uncomplicated pneumococcal pneumonia. 2815-7 Cefazolin sodium, 500 mg intramuscularly twice daily, was compared with penicillin G procaine, 600,000 units intramuscularly twice daily, in the treatment of 82 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. Patients were randomly assigned except when (...) there was a history of penicillin allergy. The patients received treatment for five days or until they were afebrile for 48 hours. No patients experienced side effects or allergic reactions. All patients recovered satisfactorily without relapses. Cefazolin in the previously described dosage is as effective as penicillin in the treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia. Jenkinson S G SG George R B RB Light R W RW Girard W M WM eng Clinical Trial Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial United States

JAMA1979

643. Efficacy of chest physiotherapy and intermittent positive-pressure breathing in the resolution of pneumonia.

Efficacy of chest physiotherapy and intermittent positive-pressure breathing in the resolution of pneumonia. 355879 1978 10 25 1978 10 25 2007 11 15 0028-4793 299 12 1978 Sep 21 The New England journal of medicine N. Engl. J. Med. Efficacy of chest physiotherapy and intermittent positive-pressure breathing in the resolution of pneumonia. 624-7 We undertook a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of chest physiotherapy and intermittent positive-pressure breathing in the treatment (...) of pneumonia. The diagnosis of pneumonia required a compatible clinical history and x-ray confirmation. A total of 54 patients were assigned to treatment and control groups and were similar in age, smoking history, underlying lung disease and prior antibiotic treatment. Antibiotic therapy, guided by Gram stain and sputum and blood cultures, was similar in both groups. Chest physiotherapy, consisting of postural drainage, percussion and vibration, was given concurrently with intermittent positive-pressure

NEJM1978