Latest & greatest articles for mammography

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on mammography or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on mammography and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for mammography

1. Mammography

Mammography Top results for mammography - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Find evidence fast My query is: English Français Deutsch Čeština Español Magyar Svenska ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search (...) button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Latest & greatest articles for mammography The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory

Trip Latest and Greatest2018

2. Motivators and barriers to mammography screening uptake by female health-care workers in primary health-care centres: a cross-sectional study.

Motivators and barriers to mammography screening uptake by female health-care workers in primary health-care centres: a cross-sectional study. BACKGROUND: Mammography screening is an effective tool for early detection and management of breast cancer. Female health-care workers' awareness of breast cancer screening is important because their beliefs and behaviours could influence other women. The aim of this study was to assess mammography screening uptake by female health-care workers (...) 40 years. Those who performed mammography for a suspected mass or other breast abnormalities were excluded. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on demographic characteristics, knowledge about mammography screening, the extent and regularity of mammography screening, and motivators and barriers influencing their mammography screening uptake. The rate of mammography screening uptake was calculated. χ 2 test and t tests were used to assess screening motivators and barriers

Lancet2018

3. Elimination of Cost Sharing for Screening Mammography in Medicare Advantage Plans.

Elimination of Cost Sharing for Screening Mammography in Medicare Advantage Plans. BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) required most insurers and the Medicare program to eliminate cost sharing for screening mammography. METHODS: We conducted a difference-in-differences study of biennial screening mammography among 15,085 women 65 to 74 years of age in 24 Medicare Advantage plans that eliminated cost sharing to provide full coverage for screening mammography, as compared with 52,035 women (...) in 48 matched control plans that had and maintained full coverage. RESULTS: In plans that eliminated cost sharing, adjusted rates of biennial screening mammography increased from 59.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.9 to 65.0) in the 2-year period before cost-sharing elimination to 65.4% (95% CI, 61.8 to 69.0) in the 2-year period thereafter. In control plans, the rates of biennial mammography were 73.1% (95% CI, 69.2 to 77.0) and 72.8% (95% CI, 69.7 to 76.0) during the same periods, yielding

NEJM2018

4. Effectiveness of and overdiagnosis from mammography screening in the Netherlands: population based study.

Effectiveness of and overdiagnosis from mammography screening in the Netherlands: population based study. Objective To analyse stage specific incidence of breast cancer in the Netherlands where women have been invited to biennial mammography screening since 1989 (ages 50-69) and 1997 (ages 70-75), and to assess changes in breast cancer mortality and quantified overdiagnosis. Design Population based study. Setting Mammography screening programme, the Netherlands. Participants Dutch women of all (...) and with the introduction of digital mammography. After deduction of clinical lead time cancers, 33% of cancers found in women invited to screening in 2010-12 and 59% of screen detected cancers would be overdiagnosed. Conclusions The Dutch mammography screening programme seems to have little impact on the burden of advanced breast cancers, which suggests a marginal effect on breast cancer mortality. About half of screen detected breast cancers would represent overdiagnosis.

BMJ2017

5. Comparison of mammography and ultrasonography findings with pathology results in patients with breast cancer in Birjand, Iran

Comparison of mammography and ultrasonography findings with pathology results in patients with breast cancer in Birjand, Iran 29238489 2018 11 13 2008-5842 9 10 2017 Oct Electronic physician Electron Physician Comparison of mammography and ultrasonography findings with pathology results in patients with breast cancer in Birjand, Iran. 5494-5498 10.19082/5494 Early diagnosis of breast cancer, the incidence of which among Iranian women is about a decade earlier than in developed countries (...) , is important. To compare mammography and ultrasonography findings with those of pathology in patients with breast cancer. This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed using medical records of 79 patients with breast malignancies, who were referred to Imam Reza Hospital and private laboratories of Birjand, Iran, from December 2012 to December 2014. The patients' information was recorded using a checklist, which included name, code, age, ultrasonography, and mammography results and pathology reports

Electronic physician2017 Full Text: Link to full Text with Trip Pro

7. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer

Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer - Health Quality Ontario (HQO) Let's make our health system healthier Open Menu Quick Links Loading Loading A A A Evidence to Improve Care Share: Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening (...) in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee Recommendation The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee recommends against publicly funding screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an adjunct to screening mammography for women who are at less than high risk for breast cancer and who have no personal history of breast cancer Breast cancer is the most common cancer among Canadian women. The most common form of screening for breast cancer

Health Quality Ontario2017

8. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women atless than high risk for breast cancer: a health technology assessment

Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women atless than high risk for breast cancer: a health technology assessment Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: a health technology assessment Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: a health technology assessment (...) Health Quality Ontario Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Health Quality Ontario. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: a health technology assessment. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario (HQO). Ontario health technology assessment series

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.2017

9. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: OHTAC recommendation

Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: OHTAC recommendation Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: OHTAC recommendation Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: OHTAC recommendation Health Quality Ontario Record (...) Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Health Quality Ontario. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: OHTAC recommendation. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario (HQO). 2016 Authors' conclusions The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee (OHTAC

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.2017

10. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). BACKGROUND: Women genetically predisposed to breast cancer often develop the disease at a young age when dense breast tissue reduces the sensitivity of X-ray mammography. Our aim was, therefore, to compare contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE MRI) with mammography for screening. METHODS: We did a prospective multicentre (...) cohort study in 649 women aged 35-49 years with a strong family history of breast cancer or a high probability of a BRCA1, BRCA2, or TP53 mutation. We recruited participants from 22 centres in the UK, and offered the women annual screening with CE MRI and mammography for 2-7 years. FINDINGS: We diagnosed 35 cancers in the 649 women screened with both mammography and CE MRI (1881 screens): 19 by CE MRI only, six by mammography only, and eight by both, with two interval cases. Sensitivity

Lancet2017

12. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer

Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer - Health Quality Ontario (HQO) Let's make our health system healthier Open Menu Quick Links Loading Loading A A A Evidence to Improve Care Share: Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening (...) in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee Recommendation The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee recommends against publicly funding screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an adjunct to screening mammography for women who are at less than high risk for breast cancer and who have no personal history of breast cancer Breast cancer is the most common cancer among Canadian women. The most common form of screening for breast cancer

Health Quality Ontario2016

13. Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness.

Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness. BACKGROUND: The goal of screening mammography is to detect small malignant tumors before they grow large enough to cause symptoms. Effective screening should therefore lead to the detection of a greater number of small tumors, followed by fewer large tumors over time. METHODS: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, 1975 through 2012, to calculate the tumor-size (...) distribution and size-specific incidence of breast cancer among women 40 years of age or older. We then calculated the size-specific cancer case fatality rate for two time periods: a baseline period before the implementation of widespread screening mammography (1975 through 1979) and a period encompassing the most recent years for which 10 years of follow-up data were available (2000 through 2002). RESULTS: After the advent of screening mammography, the proportion of detected breast tumors that were small

NEJM2016

14. Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: OHTAC recommendation

Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: OHTAC recommendation Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: OHTAC recommendation Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: OHTAC recommendation Health Quality Ontario Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation (...) Health Quality Ontario. Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: OHTAC recommendation. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario (HQO). 2016 Authors' conclusions The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee recommends publicly funding screening breast ultrasound as an adjunct to screening mammography for high-risk women in whom magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is contraindicated. The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee recommends against publicly funding screening

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.2016

15. Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment

Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment Health Quality Ontario Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made (...) for the HTA database. Citation Health Quality Ontario. Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario (HQO). Ontario health technology assessment series; 16(15). 2016 Authors' conclusions We found no evidence that evaluated the comparative effectiveness or diagnostic accuracy of screening breast ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography among average-risk women aged 50 years and over. In women at high risk of developing

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.2016

16. The impacts of public mammography screening on the relationship between socioeconomic status and cancer stage

The impacts of public mammography screening on the relationship between socioeconomic status and cancer stage 29349166 2018 11 13 2352-8273 2 2016 Dec SSM - population health SSM Popul Health The impacts of public mammography screening on the relationship between socioeconomic status and cancer stage. 502-511 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.07.002 This study aimed to investigate the relationship between socioeconomic inequality and mortality following the introduction of a public mammography screening (...) the introduction of a public mammography program. Klitkou Søren T ST Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. eng Journal Article 2016 08 03 England SSM Popul Health 101678841 2352-8273 Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;114(5):590-6 26835975 Soc Sci Med. 2003 Dec;57(12):2265-79 14572836 Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005 Feb;14(1):7-12 15677890 Epidemiology. 2011 Jul;22(4):575-81 21552129 J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 6;100(15):1082-91 18664650 Popul

SSM - population health2016 Full Text: Link to full Text with Trip Pro

18. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.

Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study. BACKGROUND: Estimates of risk for radiation-induced breast cancer from mammography screening have not considered variation in dose exposure or diagnostic work-up after abnormal screening results. OBJECTIVE: To estimate distributions of radiation-induced breast cancer incidence and mortality from digital mammography screening while considering exposure from screening and diagnostic (...) mammography and dose variation among women. DESIGN: 2 simulation-modeling approaches. SETTING: U.S. population. PATIENTS: Women aged 40 to 74 years. INTERVENTION: Annual or biennial digital mammography screening from age 40, 45, or 50 years until age 74 years. MEASUREMENTS: Lifetime breast cancer deaths averted (benefits) and radiation-induced breast cancer incidence and mortality (harms) per 100,000 women screened. RESULTS: Annual screening of 100,000 women aged 40 to 74 years was projected to induce 125

Annals of Internal Medicine2016

19. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.

Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data. BACKGROUND: Women screened with digital mammography may receive false-positive and false-negative results and subsequent imaging and biopsies. How these outcomes vary by age, time since the last screening, and individual risk factors is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with false-positive and false-negative digital mammography results (...) , additional imaging, and biopsies among a general population of women screened for breast cancer. DESIGN: Analysis of registry data. SETTING: Participating facilities at 5 U.S. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium breast imaging registries with linkages to pathology databases and tumor registries. PATIENTS: 405,191 women aged 40 to 89 years screened with digital mammography between 2003 and 2011. A total of 2963 were diagnosed with invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ within 12 months of screening

Annals of Internal Medicine2016

20. Recall Rates for Digital Mammography for Patients Undergoing Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines

Recall Rates for Digital Mammography for Patients Undergoing Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines Recall Rates for Digital Mammography for Patients Undergoing Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines | CADTH.ca Find the information you need Recall Rates for Digital Mammography for Patients Undergoing Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines Recall Rates for Digital Mammography for Patients Undergoing Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence (...) -Based Guidelines Published on: September 30, 2015 Project Number: RB0917-000 Product Line: Research Type: Devices and Systems Report Type: Summary of Abstracts Result type: Report Question What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding appropriate recall for patients undergoing digital mammography for breast cancer screening? Key Message No relevant evidence-based guidelines were identified regarding appropriate recall for patients undergoing digital mammography for breast cancer screening. Tags false

Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Rapid Review2015