Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4)
Latest & greatest articles for hydrochlorothiazide
The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on hydrochlorothiazide or other clinical topics then use Trip today.
This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on hydrochlorothiazide and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.
What is Trip?
Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.
Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.
As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.
For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via email@example.com
Chlorthalidone compared with hydrochlorothiazide in reducing cardiovascular events: systematic review and network meta-analyses Chlorthalidone compared with hydrochlorothiazide in reducing cardiovascular events: systematic review and network meta-analyses Chlorthalidone compared with hydrochlorothiazide in reducing cardiovascular events: systematic review and network meta-analyses Roush GC, Holford TR, Guddati AK CRD summary This review and network meta-analysis concluded that chlortalidone (...) was better than hydrochlorothiazide for preventing cardiovascular events, in patients with hypertension. There were concerns about the limited search, poor reporting, and indirect analysis, but the results and conclusions are likely to be reliable. Authors' objectives To compare chlortalidone and hydrochlorothiazide for reducing the number of cardiovascular events, in patients with hypertension. Searching PubMed was searched, and Ovid was used to search for English-language publications, to July 2011
Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. The optimal combination drug therapy for hypertension is not established, although current U.S. guidelines recommend inclusion of a diuretic. We hypothesized that treatment with the combination of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker would be more effective in reducing the rate of cardiovascular events than treatment with an ACE inhibitor plus (...) a thiazide diuretic.In a randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned 11,506 patients with hypertension who were at high risk for cardiovascular events to receive treatment with either benazepril plus amlodipine or benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide. The primary end point was the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for angina, resuscitation after sudden cardiac arrest, and coronary revascularization.The baseline characteristics
Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials Messerli FH, Makani H, Benjo A, Romero J, Alviar C, Bangalore S CRD summary (...) The authors concluded that hydrochlorothiazide (12.5mg to 25mg daily dose) lowered blood pressure significantly less well than other drug classes used to treat hypertension (measured by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring). The reliability of the authors' conclusion is uncertain given potential error and bias in the review process and reliance on only a few high-quality trials. Authors' objectives To evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide as assessed by ambulatory blood
[Treatment of mild and moderate hypertension with the use of captopril alone or combined with hydrochlorothiazide. A multicenter study]. The efficacy of captopril 25 mg/day as monotherapy or when necessary, in association with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day, was studied during three months in 472 patients, average age 45 (17-59) years, 51% males with mild (73%) 95 less than PAD less than 104 mmHg, and moderate (27%) arterial hypertension 104 less than PAD less than 114 mmHg. Were included (...) hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day. After three months under treatment, 411 (87%) patients normalized their dyastolic blood pressure DBP (less than 90 mmHg), from them, 273 (57.6%) had received only captopril and the others 138 (29.4%) with the addition of hydrochlorothiazide. The drop of mean arterial pressure, MAP = 2 DBP + 1 SBP was in average, 17.3 mmHg, in the 3 patients whose blood pressure normalized with captopril alone, and in average of 18.5 mmHg in those patients requiring addition of hydrochlorothiazide
Differential effects of lercanidipine/enalapril versus amlodipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril on target organ damage and sympathetic activation in non-obese essential hypertensive subjects. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of the combination of lercanidipine/enalapril versus amlodipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril on blood pressure, target organ damage and sympathetic activation in patients with grade 2 essential hypertension.This was a 3 (...) month, randomized, blinded-endpoint study in essential hypertensive patients.Office and ambulatory blood pressure, arterial stiffness, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, renal arterial resistive index, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity were evaluated at baseline, after a 2 week run-in placebo period, at 1 month and at 3 months.In total, 56 patients were assigned to lercanidipine/enalapril (n = 19), enalapril/amlodipine (n = 18) and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril (n = 19). Each pharmacological
Enalapril, atenolol, and hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate hypertension. A comparative multicentre study in general practice in Norway. Enalapril, atenolol, and hydrochlorothiazide were compared in a double-blind randomised parallel study in general practice. 436 patients with mild to moderate hypertension were included at 76 centres. A two-week placebo run-in period was followed by 16 weeks of monotherapy. The initial doses were: enalapril 20 mg; atenolol 50 mg; and hydrochlorothiazide (...) 25 mg. These were doubled if treatment was not effective after 4 weeks. Adverse reactions were the main reason for withdrawal from the study (9 on enalapril, 19 on atenolol, and 8 on hydrochlorothiazide). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced in all three groups. The reduction in systolic blood pressure was greater on enalapril than on atenolol. Serum potassium was reduced and uric acid increased on hydrochlorothiazide. Fasting blood sugar rose on atenolol but fell
Effect of Hibiscus sabdariffaon blood pressure and electrolyte profile of mild to moderate hypertensive Nigerians: A comparative study with hydrochlorothiazide. Hibiscus sabdariffa (HS) is widely consumed in Nigeria as a refreshing beverage and also as an antihypertensive agent. Since three decades ago when its antihypertensive activities were reported in several animal experiments, its consumption has greatly increased.The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of HS consumption (...) on blood pressure (BP) and electrolytes of mild to moderate hypertensive Nigerians and compare it with that of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), a diuretic widely used as first-line antihypertensive drug.Eighty newly diagnosed, but untreated mild to moderate hypertensive subjects attending Medical Out-Patients clinic of Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, were recruited for the study. They were randomly divided into three groups: A, B and C. Those in Groups A were given placebo; those in Group B
Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Associated With Chlorthalidone Versus Losartan Associated With Hydrochlorothiazide (HyzaarÂ®) in Essential Hypertension Control Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Associated With Chlorthalidone Versus Benicar HCT® in Essential Hypertension Control - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov Hide glossary Glossary Study record managers: refer to the if submitting registration or results information. Search for terms x × Study Record Detail Saved Studies Save this study (...) Arterial Hypertension Drug: Olmesartan medoxomil 40mg + chlorthalidone 12,5mg Drug: Olmesartan medoxomil 40mg + chlorthalidone 25mg Drug: Olmesartan 40mg + Hydrochlorothiazide 12,5mg Drug: Olmesartan 40mg + Hydrochlorothiazide 25mg Phase 3 Study Design Go to Layout table for study information Study Type : Interventional (Clinical Trial) Estimated Enrollment : 348 participants Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator
Comparison of Benazepril Plus Amlodipine or Hydrochlorothiazide in High-Risk Patients With Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease. Combination therapy with benazepril 40 mg and amlodipine 10 mg (B+A) has been shown to be more effective than benazepril 40 mg and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg (B+H) in reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in high-risk patients with stage 2 hypertension with similar blood pressure reductions. In the present post hoc analysis, we evaluated whether B+A is more
A randomized titrate-to-target study comparing fixed-dose combinations of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone with olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in stage-2 systolic hypertension. Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M), an angiotensin II receptor blocker, has been developed in fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) with chlorthalidone (CTD).We compared FDCs of AZL-M/CTD 20/12.5 mg once daily titrated to 40/25 mg if needed or AZL-M/CTD 40/12.5 mg once daily titrated to 80/25 mg if needed (...) with an olmesartan medoxomil (OLM)-hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 20/12.5 mg FDC once daily titrated to 40/25 mg if needed in a randomized, double-blind, 8-week study of 1085 participants with clinic SBP 160-190 mmHg and DBP 119 mmHg or less. Titration to higher doses occurred at week 4 if BP was at least 140/90 mmHg (≥130/80 mmHg if diabetes or chronic kidney disease). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in clinic SBP; 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring was also measured.Greater reductions in clinic SBP from
Efficacy and effectiveness of valsartan/amlodipine and valsartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in hypertension: randomized-controlled versus observational studies. The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to compare the results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE) studies of valsartan/amlodipine (Val/Aml) and valsartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide (Val/Aml/HCTZ) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (>140/90 mmHg).Data was pooled from 15 RCTs (N = 5542
Hydrochlorothiazide Top results for hydrochlorothiazide - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Liberating the literature ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 (...) or #2) and (#3 or #4) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Latest & greatest articles for hydrochlorothiazide The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many
[An open comparative study of captopril + hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone for the treatment of mild and moderate primary hypertension]. To compare the antihypertensive and metabolic effects of captopril combined with hydrochlorothiazide (C+HCTZ) versus chlorthalidone (CT) in mild and moderate primary hypertensive patients.Fifty five patients, without treatment or treated with 15 days placebo were randomized for treatment with the combination of captopril 50mg and hydrochlorothiazide
Efficacy and tolerability of losartan versus enalapril alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. The antihypertensive effects and the tolerability of losartan and enalapril given alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were compared in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, 16-week clinical trial. The study consisted of a 4-week placebo washout phase and a 12-week active treatment phase. Patients with mild
Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk of non-melanoma skin cancer: A nationwide case-control study from Denmark. Hydrochlorothiazide, one of the most frequently used diuretic and antihypertensive drugs in the United States and Western Europe, is photosensitizing and has previously been linked to lip cancer.To examine the association between hydrochlorothiazide use and the risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).From the Danish Cancer Registry, we identified patients (...) (cases) with nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) during 2004-2012. Controls were matched 1:20 by age and sex. Cumulative hydrochlorothiazide use (in 1995-2012) was assessed from the Danish Prescription Registry. Using conditional logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) for BCC and SCC associated with hydrochlorothiazide use.High use of hydrochlorothiazide (≥50,000 mg) was associated with ORs of 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.35) for BCC and 3.98 (95% CI, 3.68-4.31) for SCC. We
[Effectiveness and safety of losartan and its combination with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension: in result study]. There are limited data on the results of Russia's use of losartan in clinical practice for the treatment of patients with arterial hypertension (AH). The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of losartan and its fixed combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with hypertension. Primary care physicians (n=644) for 8 weeks evaluated (...) outcomes of treatment of hypertensive patients who were assigned to losartan monotherapy (12.5, 25, 50 or 100 mg) or a fixed combination with hydrochlorothiazide (losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg , losartan 100 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg). The effectiveness of treatment was assessed by size reduction of systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), and the frequency of achieving target blood pressure (<140/90 or <130/80 mm Hg in patients with diabetes). Losartan at a dose 12.5 mg