Latest & greatest articles for fluticasone

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on fluticasone or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on fluticasone and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for fluticasone

61. Breo Ellipta (fluticasone furoate and vilanterol inhalation powder) - For the long-term, once-daily, maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema

Breo Ellipta (fluticasone furoate and vilanterol inhalation powder) - For the long-term, once-daily, maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema Drug Approval Package: Brand Name (Generic Name) NDA # Drug Approval Package U.S. Food & Drug Administration Search FDA Drug Approval Package - Ellipta (fluticasone furoate and vilanterol trifenatate) Inhalation Powder Company: GlaxoSmithKline

2013 FDA - Drug Approval Package

62. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: fluticasone furoate plus vilanterol

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: fluticasone furoate plus vilanterol Chronic obstructiv Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: e pulmonary disease: fluticasone furoate plus vilanterol fluticasone furoate plus vilanterol Evidence summary Published: 18 June 2013 nice.org.uk/guidance/esnm21 pathways K Ke ey points from the e y points from the evidence vidence The content of this evidence summary was up-to-date in June 2013. See summaries of product characteristics (SPCs), British national (...) formulary (BNF) or the MHRA or NICE websites for up- to-date information. Summary Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (Relvar Ellipta) is a once-daily corticosteroid and long-acting beta 2 agonist combination inhaler, which has been submitted for a marketing authorisation for the symptomatic treatment of adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and an exacerbation history despite regular bronchodilator therapy. There are currently no published studies comparing fluticasone furoate/vilanterol

2013 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence - Advice

63. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of beclomethasone/formoterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in patients with moderate to severe asthma

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of beclomethasone/formoterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in patients with moderate to severe asthma Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of beclomethasone/formoterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in patients with moderate to severe asthma Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of beclomethasone/formoterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in patients with moderate to severe asthma Gerzeli S, Rognoni C, Quaglini S, Cavallo MC (...) , Cremonesi G, Papi A Record Status This is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Each abstract contains a brief summary of the methods, the results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the study and the conclusions drawn. CRD summary The objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of beclomethasone with formoterol versus fluticasone propionate with salmeterol, for patients with moderate-to-severe

2013 NHS Economic Evaluation Database.

64. An integrated analysis of the efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray versus placebo on the nasal symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis. (Abstract)

An integrated analysis of the efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray versus placebo on the nasal symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis. Intranasal corticosteroids are widely prescribed for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). The aim of this analysis was to determine whether the beneficial effects of once-daily (q.d.) fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) effectively improved individual nasal symptoms of PAR. An integrated analysis was performed on data from three

2013 Allergy and Asthma Proceedings

65. Dymista (azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone proprionate) Nasal Spray

Dymista (azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone proprionate) Nasal Spray Drug Approval Package: Dymista (azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone proprionate) NDA #202236 Drug Approval Package U.S. Food & Drug Administration Search FDA Drug Approval Package - Dymista (azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone proprionate) Nasal Spray, 137 mcg/50mcg Company: Meda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Application No.: 202236 Approval Date: 05/01/2012 Persons with disabilities having problems accessing the PDF

2012 FDA - Drug Approval Package

66. Fluticasone furoate and Vilanterol (Breo Ellipta)

Fluticasone furoate and Vilanterol (Breo Ellipta) CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 204275Orig1s000 MEDICAL REVIEW(S) CLINICAL REVIEW Application Type NDA Application Number(s) 204275 Priority or Standard Standard Submit Date(s) July 11, 2012 Received Date(s) July 12, 2012 PDUFA Goal Date May 12, 2012 Division / Office ODEII/DPARP Reviewer Name(s) Sofia Chaudhry, MD Review Completion Date March 18, 2013 Established Name Fluticasone furoate and Vilanterol (Proposed (...) ) Trade Name Breo Ellipta Therapeutic Class ICS/LABA Applicant GlaxoSmithKline Formulation(s) Orally inhaled Dosing Regimen Once daily Indication(s) 1) Maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction 2) Reduction in exacerbation Intended Population(s) COPD Template Version: March 6, 2009 Reference ID: 3277679Clinical Review Sofia Chaudhry, MD NDA 204275 Breo Ellipta (fluticasone furoate and vilanterol) 2 Table of Contents 1 RECOMMENDATIONS/RISK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT 9 1.1 Recommendation on Regulatory Action

2012 FDA - Drug Approval Package

67. Asthma: fluticasone/formoterol (Flutiform) combination inhaler

Asthma: fluticasone/formoterol (Flutiform) combination inhaler Asthma: fluticasone/formoterol (Flutiform) Asthma: fluticasone/formoterol (Flutiform) combination inhaler combination inhaler Evidence summary Published: 12 October 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/esnm3 pathways Ov Overview erview Key points from the evidence The content of this evidence summary was up-to-date in October 2012. See summaries of product characteristics (SPCs), British national formulary (BNF), BNF for children (BNFc (...) ) or the MHRA or NICE websites for up-to-date information. Fluticasone/formoterol (Flutiform) is a combination inhaler containing an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA). It was launched in the UK in September 2012 and is indicated for regular treatment of asthma when a combination inhaler is appropriate: for people whose asthma is not adequately controlled on an ICS and an 'as required' inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonist, or for people whose asthma is adequately controlled

2012 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence - Advice

68. Efficacy of indacaterol 75 μg versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol-budesonide or salmeterol-fluticasone for COPD: a network meta-analysis. (Full text)

Efficacy of indacaterol 75 μg versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol-budesonide or salmeterol-fluticasone for COPD: a network meta-analysis. The purpose of this study was to update our network meta-analysis in order to compare the efficacy of indacaterol 75 μg with that of a fixed-dose combination of formoterol and budesonide (FOR/BUD) and a fixed-dose combination salmeterol and fluticasone (SAL/FP) for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on evidence

2012 International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease PubMed abstract

69. Budesonide/formoterol vs. salmeterol/fluticasone in COPD: a systematic review and adjusted indirect comparison of pneumonia in randomised controlled trials (Full text)

Budesonide/formoterol vs. salmeterol/fluticasone in COPD: a systematic review and adjusted indirect comparison of pneumonia in randomised controlled trials This analysis was designed to provide a comparison between budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone for the relative incidence of pneumonia adverse events, pneumonia serious adverse events and pneumonia-related mortality in patients being treated for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.An initial literature search revealed (...) no suitable head-to-head trials between budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone and therefore a systematic review was conducted to find randomised controlled trials providing data for input into an adjusted indirect comparison of the two combination treatments using placebo as a common comparator. The Bucher adjusted indirect comparison method was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.Eight salmeterol/fluticasone trials and four budesonide/formoterol trials were identified

2011 EvidenceUpdates PubMed abstract

70. Fluticasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness

Fluticasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness Fluticasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness Fluticasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Record Status This is a bibliographic record (...) of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Fluticasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). 2011 Authors' conclusions Two randomized controlled studies showed similar efficacy between

2011 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

71. Oxymetazoline adds to the effectiveness of fluticasone furoate in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (Abstract)

Oxymetazoline adds to the effectiveness of fluticasone furoate in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis In clinical trials, only about 60% of subjects report an excellent response to intranasal steroids, suggesting a need to add therapies to intranasal steroids to provide additional efficacy.To determine whether the combination of fluticasone furoate and oxymetazoline is more efficacious than either agent alone, and to determine whether rhinitis medicamentosa develops after treatment.We (...) performed a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled parallel study. Sixty patients with perennial allergy were randomized to 4 weeks of once-a-night treatment with fluticasone furoate, oxymetazoline hydrochloride, the combination, or placebo. They were monitored during treatment and for 2 weeks posttreatment.The total nasal symptom score over the 4 weeks of treatment was lower with the combination (median, 143; range, 30-316) compared with treatment with placebo (262; 116-358

2011 EvidenceUpdates Controlled trial quality: predicted high

72. Comparison of the effect of low-dose ciclesonide and fixed-dose fluticasone propionate and salmeterol combination on long-term asthma control (Abstract)

Comparison of the effect of low-dose ciclesonide and fixed-dose fluticasone propionate and salmeterol combination on long-term asthma control Patients with mild persistent asthma constitute about 70% of the asthma population; thus, it is important to know which first-line treatment is best for the management of mild asthma. We compared benefits of first-line treatment with ciclesonide and a combination of fluticasone and salmeterol in patients with mild asthma.Patients aged 12 to 75 years (...) with mild persistent asthma were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After run-in, patients were randomized to ciclesonide 160 μg once daily (CIC160), fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 100/50 μg bid (FP200/S100), or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary variable was time to first severe asthma exacerbation; the coprimary variable was the percentage of poorly controlled asthma days. Patients recorded asthma symptoms and salbutamol use in electronic diaries and completed

2011 EvidenceUpdates Controlled trial quality: predicted high

73. Comparative cost-effectiveness of a fluticasone-propionate/salmeterol combination versus anticholinergics as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Full text)

Comparative cost-effectiveness of a fluticasone-propionate/salmeterol combination versus anticholinergics as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Comparative cost-effectiveness of a fluticasone-propionate/salmeterol combination versus anticholinergics as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Comparative cost-effectiveness of a fluticasone-propionate/salmeterol combination versus anticholinergics as initial maintenance therapy (...) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Dalal AA, Roberts MH, Petersen HV, Blanchette CM, Mapel DW Record Status This is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Each abstract contains a brief summary of the methods, the results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the study and the conclusions drawn. CRD summary This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of initial maintenance therapy with fluticasone

2011 NHS Economic Evaluation Database. PubMed abstract

74. Comparative efficacy of indacaterol 150mug and 300mug versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol + budesonide or salmeterol + fluticasone for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis

Comparative efficacy of indacaterol 150mug and 300mug versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol + budesonide or salmeterol + fluticasone for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis Untitled Document The CRD Databases will not be available from 08:00 BST on Friday 4th October until 08:00 BST on Monday 7th October for essential maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience.

2011 DARE.

75. Combination therapy salmeterol/fluticasone versus doubling dose of fluticasone in children with asthma (Full text)

Combination therapy salmeterol/fluticasone versus doubling dose of fluticasone in children with asthma For children with symptomatic asthma despite low to moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids, evidence is still lacking whether to add a long-acting bronchodilator or to increase the dose of inhaled corticosteroids.To evaluate whether salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFP), 50/100 μg twice a day, is noninferior regarding symptom control compared with fluticasone propionate (FP), 200 μg twice

2011 EvidenceUpdates Controlled trial quality: predicted high PubMed abstract

76. Efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray vs. placebo for the treatment of ocular and nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review. (Full text)

Efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray vs. placebo for the treatment of ocular and nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review. Although previous data suggest that intranasal fluticasone furoate (FF) improves ocular symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR), it presents serious limitations that question its results and conclusions. Therefore, an independent systematic review with meta-analysis is required to confirm and clarify the magnitude of the effect of FF.This review compared

2011 Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology PubMed abstract

77. Comparative efficacy of indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol + budesonide or salmeterol + fluticasone for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease--a network meta-analysis. (Full text)

Comparative efficacy of indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol + budesonide or salmeterol + fluticasone for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease--a network meta-analysis. To compare efficacy of indacaterol to that of fixed-dose combination (FDC) formoterol and budesonide (FOR/BUD) and FDC salmeterol and fluticasone (SAL/FP) for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on the available randomized clinical trials

2011 International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease PubMed abstract

78. Combination fluticasone and salmeterol versus fixed dose combination budesonide and formoterol for chronic asthma in adults and children. (Full text)

Combination fluticasone and salmeterol versus fixed dose combination budesonide and formoterol for chronic asthma in adults and children. Long-acting beta-agonists are a common second line treatment in people with asthma inadequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. Single device inhalers combine a long-acting beta-agonist with an inhaled steroid delivering both drugs as a maintenance treatment regimen. This updated review compares two fixed-dose options, fluticasone/salmeterol FP (...) /SALand budesonide/formoterol, since this comparison represents a common therapeutic choice.To assess the relative effects of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol in people with asthma.We searched the Cochrane Airways Group register of trials with prespecified terms. We performed additional hand searching of manufacturers' web sites and online trial registries. Search results are current to June 2011.We included randomised studies comparing fixed dose fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide

2011 Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) PubMed abstract

79. Inhaled fluticasone propionate reduces postoperative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness (Abstract)

Inhaled fluticasone propionate reduces postoperative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness Sore throat is a common complication after surgery. Postoperative cough and hoarseness can also be distressing to patients. We sought to determine the effect of an inhaler steroid on sore throat, cough, and hoarseness during the first 24 hours of the postoperative period.We enrolled 120 women with ASA physical status I or II and term singleton pregnancy who were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under (...) general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: in the sitting position, group F patients received 500 μg inhaled fluticasone propionate via a spacer device during 2 deep inspirations, after arrival in the operating room, and group C had no treatment. The patients were interviewed by a blinded investigator for postoperative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness at 1 and 24 hours after surgery.There were no significant differences in age, height, weight, body mass index, duration of surgery

2010 EvidenceUpdates Controlled trial quality: uncertain

80. Body mass index and response to asthma therapy: fluticasone propionate/salmeterol versus montelukast. (Abstract)

Body mass index and response to asthma therapy: fluticasone propionate/salmeterol versus montelukast. We studied the relationship between body mass index (BMI) on responses to asthma therapy using a retrospective analysis of four previously reported clinical trials. Fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol via Diskus 100/50 microg twice daily and montelukast (MON) 10 mg daily were compared. BMI was classified as underweight (less than 20 kg/m(2)), normal (20-24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9 kg

2010 Journal of Asthma