Latest & greatest articles for chronic kidney disease

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on chronic kidney disease or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on chronic kidney disease and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for chronic kidney disease

41. Efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review

Efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Timing (...) A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative

2019 PROSPERO

42. Comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting and drug-eluting stents in patients with left main coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting and drug-eluting stents in patients with left main coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites (...) no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess

2019 PROSPERO

43. A systematic review of the clinical and economic outcomes associated with guideline-recommended food provision studies in heart disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, Alzheimer's disease, and older adults

A systematic review of the clinical and economic outcomes associated with guideline-recommended food provision studies in heart disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, Alzheimer's disease, and older adults Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files (...) yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc

2019 PROSPERO

44. The effectiveness of Huang Qi and its extracts on chronic kidney disease

The effectiveness of Huang Qi and its extracts on chronic kidney disease Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Timing and effect (...) A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative

2019 PROSPERO

45. Prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of cardiovascular, metabolic and chronic kidney diseases in HIV-infected vs. uninfected adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of cardiovascular, metabolic and chronic kidney diseases in HIV-infected vs. uninfected adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external (...) yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc

2019 PROSPERO

46. Hyperuricemia and outcomes in chronic kidney disease: protocol of pre-clinical systematic review

Hyperuricemia and outcomes in chronic kidney disease: protocol of pre-clinical systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address (...) A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative

2019 PROSPERO

47. Health care professional experiences working with patients with the long-term diseases chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease or type 2 diabetes - a meta-ethnography

Health care professional experiences working with patients with the long-term diseases chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease or type 2 diabetes - a meta-ethnography Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites (...) no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess

2019 PROSPERO

48. The effect of uric acid-lowering therapy on kidney function among patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The effect of uric acid-lowering therapy on kidney function among patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content (...) ); sex (stratified per sex); duration of index ischemia (linear); stem cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models

2019 PROSPERO

49. Pharmacological interventions for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D [Cochrane protocol]

Pharmacological interventions for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D [Cochrane protocol] Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated (...) cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome

2019 PROSPERO

50. Systematic review and meta-analysis of iron therapy in anaemic adults without chronic kidney disease.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of iron therapy in anaemic adults without chronic kidney disease. Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files (...) cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome

2019 PROSPERO

51. Treatment of mineral bone disease in children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of case series

Treatment of mineral bone disease in children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of case series Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content (...) ); sex (stratified per sex); duration of index ischemia (linear); stem cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models

2019 PROSPERO

52. Chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease Chronic kidney disease - NICE CKS Share Chronic kidney disease: Summary Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a reduction in kidney function or structural damage (or both) present for more than 3 months, with associated health implications. CKD should be diagnosed in people with: Markers of kidney damage such as proteinuria (urinary albumin:creatinine ratio [ACR] greater than 3 mg/mmol), urine sediment abnormalities, electrolyte and other abnormalities due to tubular disorders (...) and avoiding the use of over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Assessing for hypertension and CVD, and managing appropriately. Prescribing a low-cost renin-angiotensin system antagonist, if appropriate. Ensuring the person is offered immunizations for influenza and pneumococcal disease. Have I got the right topic? Have I got the right topic? From age 18 years onwards. This CKS topic is based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Chronic kidney

2019 NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries

53. Comparative effectiveness and safety of lipid-lowering agents in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies

Comparative effectiveness and safety of lipid-lowering agents in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears (...) . the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test

2019 PROSPERO

54. Associations between multimorbidity, mortality and adverse clinical outcomes in people with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review

Associations between multimorbidity, mortality and adverse clinical outcomes in people with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration (...) of index ischemia (linear); stem cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units

2019 PROSPERO

55. Efficacy of febuxostat for treating hyperuricemia among chronic kidney disease patients and among renal transplant recipients

Efficacy of febuxostat for treating hyperuricemia among chronic kidney disease patients and among renal transplant recipients Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any (...) cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome

2019 PROSPERO

56. Efficacy and safety of febuxostat for treating hyperuricemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of febuxostat for treating hyperuricemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration (...) of index ischemia (linear); stem cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units

2019 PROSPERO

57. The link between dietary patterns and outcomes of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review

The link between dietary patterns and outcomes of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external (...) cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome

2019 PROSPERO

58. The association between depression and inflammation in patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD) or End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD): a systematic review of the literature

The association between depression and inflammation in patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD) or End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD): a systematic review of the literature Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability (...) species); sex (stratified per sex); duration of index ischemia (linear); stem cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease

2019 PROSPERO

59. The effects of exercise training for proteinuria and quality of life with chronic kidney disease in adults: a systematic review.

The effects of exercise training for proteinuria and quality of life with chronic kidney disease in adults: a systematic review. Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any (...) cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome

2019 PROSPERO

60. Dialysis vs. conservative kidney management to treat patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dialysis vs. conservative kidney management to treat patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any (...) cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome

2019 PROSPERO