Latest & greatest articles for amlodipine

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on amlodipine or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on amlodipine and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for amlodipine

1. Amlodipine

Amlodipine Top results for amlodipine - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Liberating the literature ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 (...) or #4) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Latest & greatest articles for amlodipine The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence

2018 Trip Latest and Greatest

2. perindopril arginine / amlodipine (Viacoram)

perindopril arginine / amlodipine (Viacoram) perindopril arginine / amlodipine | CADTH.ca Find the information you need perindopril arginine / amlodipine perindopril arginine / amlodipine Last Updated: April 4, 2016 Result type: Reports Project Number: SR0490-000 Product Line: Generic Name: perindopril arginine / amlodipine Brand Name: Viacoram Manufacturer: Servier Canada Inc. Indications: Hypertension, essential Submission Type: New Project Status: Complete Date Recommendation Issued: October

2016 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Common Drug Review

3. Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of indapamide SR/amlodipine combination in older patients with hypertension: A post hoc analysis of the NESTOR trial (Natrilix SR vs Enalapril in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetics With Microalbuminuria). Full Text available with Trip Pro

Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of indapamide SR/amlodipine combination in older patients with hypertension: A post hoc analysis of the NESTOR trial (Natrilix SR vs Enalapril in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetics With Microalbuminuria). To examine the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of indapamide sustained-release (SR)/amlodipine compared with enalapril/amlodipine in patients 65 years and older with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) on monotherapy, a post hoc analysis of the NESTOR trial (...) (Natrilix SR vs Enalapril in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetics With Microalbuminuria) was conducted. NESTOR randomized 570 patients (n=197, aged ≥65 years) with hypertension (systolic BP 140-180/diastolic BP <110 mm Hg) to indapamide SR 1.5 mg or enalapril 10 mg. If target BP (<140/85 mm Hg) was not achieved at 6 weeks, amlodipine 5 mg was added with uptitration to 10 mg if required. A total of 107 patients aged 65 years and older received dual therapy (53 indapamide SR/amlodipine and 54 enalapril

2018 Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) Controlled trial quality: uncertain

4. Losartan/Amlodipine on Hemodynamics Parameters and Arterial Stiffness in Arterial Hypertension

Losartan/Amlodipine on Hemodynamics Parameters and Arterial Stiffness in Arterial Hypertension Losartan/Amlodipine on Hemodynamics Parameters and Arterial Stiffness in Arterial Hypertension - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov Hide glossary Glossary Study record managers: refer to the if submitting registration or results information. Search for terms x × Study Record Detail Saved Studies Save this study Warning You have reached the maximum number of saved studies (100). Please remove one (...) or more studies before adding more. Losartan/Amlodipine on Hemodynamics Parameters and Arterial Stiffness in Arterial Hypertension The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our for details. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03626259 Recruitment Status : Recruiting

2018 Clinical Trials

5. Efficacy of amlodipine besylate and valsartan (ABVS) for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension (MMH): a systematic review

Efficacy of amlodipine besylate and valsartan (ABVS) for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension (MMH): a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record

2019 PROSPERO

6. Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Combination Therapy of Candesartan and Amlodipine Versus Candesartan Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients Inadequately Controlled by Candesartan Monotherapy

Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Combination Therapy of Candesartan and Amlodipine Versus Candesartan Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients Inadequately Controlled by Candesartan Monotherapy Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Combination Therapy of Candesartan and Amlodipine Versus Candesartan Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients Inadequately Controlled by Candesartan Monotherapy - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov Hide glossary Glossary Study record managers: refer (...) to the if submitting registration or results information. Search for terms x × Study Record Detail Saved Studies Save this study Warning You have reached the maximum number of saved studies (100). Please remove one or more studies before adding more. Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Combination Therapy of Candesartan and Amlodipine Versus Candesartan Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients Inadequately Controlled by Candesartan Monotherapy The safety and scientific validity of this study

2016 Clinical Trials

7. Valsartan 160 mg/Amlodipine 5 mg Combination Therapy versus Amlodipine 10 mg in Hypertensive Patients with Inadequate Response to Amlodipine 5 mg Monotherapy. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Valsartan 160 mg/Amlodipine 5 mg Combination Therapy versus Amlodipine 10 mg in Hypertensive Patients with Inadequate Response to Amlodipine 5 mg Monotherapy. When monotherapy is inadequate for blood pressure control, the next step is either to continue monotherapy in increased doses or to add another antihypertensive agent. However, direct comparison of double-dose monotherapy versus combination therapy has rarely been done. The objective of this study is to compare 10 mg of amlodipine (...) with an amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg combination in patients whose blood pressure control is inadequate with amlodipine 5 mg.This study was conducted as a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Men and women aged 20-80 who were diagnosed as having hypertension, who had been on amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy for at least 4 weeks, and whose daytime mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥135 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥85 mmHg on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were

2016 Korean circulation journal Controlled trial quality: uncertain

8. Amlodipine / Valsartan Mylan - hypertension

Amlodipine / Valsartan Mylan - hypertension 28 January 2016 EMA/CHMP/182030/2016 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report Amlodipine/Valsartan Mylan International non-proprietary name: amlodipine / valsartan Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/004037/0000 Note Assessment report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. 30 Churchill Place ? Canary Wharf ? London E14 5EU ? United Kingdom An agency of the European Union Telephone (...) /National Formulary UV Ultraviolet light Assessment report EMA/CHMP/182030/2016 Page 4/31 1. Background information on the procedure 1.1. Submission of the dossier The applicant MYLAN S.A.S. submitted on 20 January 2015 an application for Marketing Authorisation to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for Amlodipine/Valsartan Mylan, through the centralised procedure under Article 3 (3) of Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004 – ‘Generic of a Centrally authorised product’. The eligibility to the centralised

2016 European Medicines Agency - EPARs

9. Comparison of morning vs bedtime administration of the combination of valsartan/amlodipine on nocturnal brachial and central blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Comparison of morning vs bedtime administration of the combination of valsartan/amlodipine on nocturnal brachial and central blood pressure in patients with hypertension. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of morning and bedtime administration of valsartan/amlodipine combination therapy (80/5 mg) on nocturnal brachial and central blood pressure (BP) measured by ambulatory BP monitoring in patients with hypertension. This was a 16-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open (...) -label, crossover, noninferiority clinical trial. Patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring at randomization, at switching, and at the end of the study. Twenty-three patients (mean age, 68.0 years) were studied. The difference in nocturnal brachial systolic BP between the morning and bedtime administrations of combination valsartan/amlodipine was -3.2 mm Hg, and the two-sided 95% confidence interval ranged from -6.8 to 0.4 mm Hg. The difference in nocturnal central systolic BP was -4.0 mm

2018 Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) Controlled trial quality: uncertain

10. Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy With Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Rosuvastatin in Patients With Dyslipidemia and Hypertension: The Jeil Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Rosuvastatin Randomized Clinical Trial. (Abstract)

Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy With Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Rosuvastatin in Patients With Dyslipidemia and Hypertension: The Jeil Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Rosuvastatin Randomized Clinical Trial. Fixed-dose combination therapy with telmisartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin is needed in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia for better adherence and cost-effectiveness than free-equivalent combination therapies. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety (...) of combination therapy with telmisartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin versus telmisartan plus amlodipine or telmisartan plus rosuvastatin in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia.The Jeil Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Rosuvastatin Randomized Clinical Trial (J-TAROS-RCT) was an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, Phase III clinical trial conducted at 9 hospitals in Korea. After a run-in period of >4 weeks, patients who fulfilled the criteria of the National Cholesterol Education

2019 Clinical therapeutics Controlled trial quality: predicted high

11. S-amlodipine plus chlorthalidone vs. S-amlodipine plus telmisartan in hypertensive patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Full Text available with Trip Pro

S-amlodipine plus chlorthalidone vs. S-amlodipine plus telmisartan in hypertensive patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial The efficacy of a combination of a calcium channel blocker (CCB) plus chlorthalidone (diuretic) versus a CCB plus an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in patients not responding to CCB monotherapy has not been evaluated previously. We plan to compare the efficacy and safety of S-amlodipine (CCB) plus chlorthalidone (...) versus S-amlodipine plus telmisartan (ARB) combinations among hypertension patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy.This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel, non-inferiority phase 4 study. Hypertension patients who have been treated with amlodipine (5 mg) or S-amlodipine (2.5 mg) monotherapy for ≥2 weeks and whose mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is greater than 90 mmHg will be randomized to either S-amlodipine (2.5 mg) plus chlorthalidone (25 mg) or S

2018 Trials Controlled trial quality: predicted high

12. Effect of losartan combined with amlodipine or with a thiazide on uric acid levels in hypertensive patients. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Effect of losartan combined with amlodipine or with a thiazide on uric acid levels in hypertensive patients. Hyperuricemia leads to endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance, and has been associated with diseases such as hypertension. Antihypertensive drugs modify serum uric acid levels, however, few data are available about their combinations on uricemia. In this study we evaluate the effect of two combinations of losartan, with amlodipine or with hydrochlorothiazide, on serum uric acid (...) levels in hypertensive patients.A total of 60 hypertensive patients were randomized in two groups; group LA received losartan/amlodipine (100/5 mg) once a day, whereas LH group received losartan hydrochlorothiazide (100/12.5 mg) once a day for 3 months. In both groups serum uric acid levels were measured at the beginning and end of the study. Patients were evaluated monthly for blood pressure (BP) and adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed with a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA

2016 Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease Controlled trial quality: uncertain

13. Single-Pill Combination of Perindopril/Indapamide/Amlodipine in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Single-Pill Combination of Perindopril/Indapamide/Amlodipine in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Patients with hypertension often require a combination of three antihypertensive agents to achieve blood pressure control, but very few single-pill triple combinations are available. The aim of this study was to determine whether a single-pill triple combination of perindopril, indapamide, and amlodipine was as effective as a dual-pill combination (...) of perindopril/indapamide plus separate amlodipine at reducing blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled, essential hypertension.This international, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted in men or women aged ≥18 years old with confirmed essential hypertension (SBP ≥140 and <160 mmHg and DBP ≥90 and <100 mmHg), uncontrolled on maximal dose antihypertensive monotherapy or with a single dose of dual therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to: single-pill triple combination

2017 Cardiology and therapy Controlled trial quality: uncertain

14. Simvastatin: dose limitations with concomitant amlodipine or diltiazem

Simvastatin: dose limitations with concomitant amlodipine or diltiazem Simvastatin: dose limitations with concomitant amlodipine or diltiazem - GOV.UK GOV.UK uses cookies to make the site simpler. or Search Simvastatin: dose limitations with concomitant amlodipine or diltiazem The maximum recommended dose for simvastatin in conjunction with amlodipine and diltiazem is now 20 mg/day. Published 11 December 2014 From: Therapeutic area: , Contents Article date: October 2012 Pharmacokinetic data (...) Simvastatin is metabolised through the CYP3A4 pathway. Concomitant use of CYP3A4 inhibitors has the potential to increase exposure to simvastatin . Both amlodipine and diltiazem are substrates and inhibitors of CYP3A4 and therefore increase the plasma concentration (AUC0-24h) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of simvastatin when they are co-administered. Studies have found that after 10 days of amlodipine (10 mg), the AUC0-24h of simvastatin and simvastatic acid following a single dose

2012 MHRA Drug Safety Update

15. Parallel-Group Comparison of Olmesartan (OLM), Amlodipine (AML) and Hydrochlorothiazid (HCTZ) in Hypertension

+ hydroclororthiazide One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. Two hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablets taken once per day. Other Names: Azor Norvasc Experimental: olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/10mg/12.5mg Drug: olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 10 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. One hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet + one hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg placebo tablet (...) Parallel-Group Comparison of Olmesartan (OLM), Amlodipine (AML) and Hydrochlorothiazid (HCTZ) in Hypertension Parallel-Group Comparison of Olmesartan (OLM), Amlodipine (AML) and Hydrochlorothiazid (HCTZ) in Hypertension - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov Hide glossary Glossary Study record managers: refer to the if submitting registration or results information. Search for terms x × Study Record Detail Saved Studies Save this study Warning You have reached the maximum number of saved studies

2009 Clinical Trials

16. Initial combination therapy with amlodipine/valsartan compared with monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension. (Abstract)

Initial combination therapy with amlodipine/valsartan compared with monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension. Achieving target blood pressure (BP) is influenced by baseline BP. Post hoc analyses of a placebo-controlled trial of amlodipine/valsartan versus monotherapies were conducted to characterize BP control by baseline BP. Hypertensive patients were randomized to amlodipine 10 mg, valsartan 160 or 320 mg, amlodipine/valsartan 10/160 or 10/320 mg, or placebo. Analysis of BP control rates (...) focused on patients receiving the highest combination and monotherapy doses, with adverse events assessed for all doses. Analyses included 834 patients (mean age: 57 years; male: 51.3%; white: 79.4%; stage 2 hypertension: 61%; mean BP: 157/99 mm Hg). Two weeks after starting therapy, BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) rates were greater with amlodipine/valsartan 10/320 mg (49%) versus monotherapies (32%-38%) and placebo (16%). Consistent results were observed in stage 1 and 2 patients. Among patients

2011 Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH Controlled trial quality: uncertain

17. Amlodipine or lisinopril was not better than chlorthalidone for reducing CVD risk in hypertensive black or non-black patients Full Text available with Trip Pro

Amlodipine or lisinopril was not better than chlorthalidone for reducing CVD risk in hypertensive black or non-black patients Amlodipine or lisinopril was not better than chlorthalidone for reducing CVD risk in hypertensive black or non-black patients | BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising to you. You can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our . Log (...) in using your username and password For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts Username * Password * your user name or password? Search for this keyword Search for this keyword Main menu Log in using your username and password For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts Username * Password * your user name or password? You are here Amlodipine or lisinopril was not better than chlorthalidone for reducing CVD risk in hypertensive black or non-black patients Article Text

2006 Evidence-Based Medicine

18. Efficacy of amlodipine besylate and Valsartan for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Efficacy of amlodipine besylate and Valsartan for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Clinical researchers found that Amlodipine besylate and Valsartan (ABVS) can effectively treat mild to moderate hypertension (MMH). However, no study has systematically investigated its efficacy and safety for patients with MMH. Thus, present study will systematically assess the efficacy and safety of ABVS for patients with MMH.MEDICINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Ovid, PsycINFO, Web of Science

2019 Medicine

19. The association of smoothness index of central blood pressure with ambulatory carotid femoral pulse wave velocity after 20-week treatment with losartan in combination with amlodipine versus hydrochlorothiazide. Full Text available with Trip Pro

The association of smoothness index of central blood pressure with ambulatory carotid femoral pulse wave velocity after 20-week treatment with losartan in combination with amlodipine versus hydrochlorothiazide. The aim of this study was to identify associations between the smoothness index of central SBP (CSBP) and changes of ambulatory carotid femoral pulse wave velocity in response to 20-week treatments with losartan and amlodipine vs. losartan and hydrochlorthiazide combinations.For 142 (...) were not different between groups (losartan and hydrochlorthiazide: -15.2 ± 15.0/-7.8 ± 8.0 vs. losartan and amlodipine: -14.9 ± 13.7/-9.2 ± 7.5 mmHg). Reduction of 24-h CSBP was not significantly different (losartan and hydrochlorthiazide: 6.4 ± 1.1 vs. losartan and amlodipine: 9.2 ± 1.1 mmHg, P = 0.074). Reduction in nocturnal AcfPWV was greater in the losartan and amlodipine group (losartan and hydrochlorthiazide: 0.09 ± 0.05 vs. losartan and amlodipine: 0.26 ± 0.05 m/s, P = 0.0216

2019 Journal of Hypertension Controlled trial quality: uncertain

20. Efficacy and Tolerability of Telmisartan/Amlodipine + Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Telmisartan/Amlodipine Combination Therapy for Essential Hypertension Uncontrolled With Telmisartan/Amlodipine: The Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind TAHYTI St Full Text available with Trip Pro

Efficacy and Tolerability of Telmisartan/Amlodipine + Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Telmisartan/Amlodipine Combination Therapy for Essential Hypertension Uncontrolled With Telmisartan/Amlodipine: The Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind TAHYTI St This 8-week study in Korea aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a telmisartan/amlodipine + hydrochlorothiazide (TAH) combination versus telmisartan/amlodipine (TA) combination in patients with essential hypertension that did

2018 Clinical therapeutics Controlled trial quality: uncertain