Latest & greatest articles for Speech Delay

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on Speech Delay or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on Speech Delay and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for Speech Delay

1. Screening for speech and language delays and disorders in children age 5 years or younger: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Screening for speech and language delays and disorders in children age 5 years or younger: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for speech and language delays and disorders in children age 5 years or younger: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for speech and language delays and disorders in children age 5 years or younger: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force To evaluate the evidence (...) on screening and treating children for speech and language delays or disorders for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation To evaluate the evidence on screening and treating children for speech and language delays or disorders for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Screening

2015 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

2. Speech and Language Delay and Disorders in Children Age 5 and Younger: Screening

Speech and Language Delay and Disorders in Children Age 5 and Younger: Screening Final Update Summary: Speech and Language Delay and Disorders in Children Age 5 and Younger: Screening - US Preventive Services Task Force Search USPSTF Website Text size: Assembly version: 1.0.0.308 Last Build: 11/16/2018 6:27:19 PM You are here: Final Summary Speech and Language Delay and Disorders in Children Age 5 and Younger: Screening Release Date: July 2015 Recommendation Summary Population Recommendation (...) Grade Children aged 5 years or younger The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for speech and language delay and disorders in children aged 5 years or younger. See the for suggestions for practice regarding the I statement. ( ) Related Information for Consumers Related Information for Health Professionals There is no related information for health professionals. Supporting Documents ( ) ( ) Clinical Summary Clinical

2015 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

3. Screening tools compared to parental concern for identifying speech and language delays in preschool children: a review of the diagnostic accuracy

Screening tools compared to parental concern for identifying speech and language delays in preschool children: a review of the diagnostic accuracy Screening tools compared to parental concern for identifying speech and language delays in preschool children: a review of the diagnostic accuracy Screening tools compared to parental concern for identifying speech and language delays in preschool children: a review of the diagnostic accuracy CADTH Record Status This is a bibliographic record (...) of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation CADTH. Screening tools compared to parental concern for identifying speech and language delays in preschool children: a review of the diagnostic accuracy. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Rapid Response - Summary with Critical Appraisal. 2013 Authors' conclusions No health technology assessments, systematic

2014 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

4. Screening Tools Compared to Parental Concern for Identifying Speech and Language Delays in Preschool Children: A Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy

Screening Tools Compared to Parental Concern for Identifying Speech and Language Delays in Preschool Children: A Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy Screening Tools Compared With Parental Concern for Identifying Speech and Language Delays in Preschool Children: A Review Context Because the acquisition of speech and language skills is fundamental to a child’s development, early identification of delays in this area is important. Screening for speech and language delays may allow more children (...) to have access to intervention services or assistance at an age when they are likely to derive the greatest benefit. Technology Screening methods used to identify young children at risk of speech and language delays include direct interaction with the child, parent-completed screening instruments such as standardized tests and questionnaires, and expressions of concern from parents regarding their children’s communication skills. Children who have been identified as being at risk can then undergo more

2013 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Rapid Review

5. Should creatine kinase be checked in all boys presenting with speech delay?

Should creatine kinase be checked in all boys presenting with speech delay? BestBets: Should creatine kinase be checked in all boys presenting with speech delay? Should creatine kinase be checked in all boys presenting with speech delay? Report By: Claire T Lundy, Gary M Doherty and Elaine M Hicks - Specialist Registrars Search checked by Bob Phillips - Section Editor, Archimedes, Archives of Disease in Childhood Institution: Department of Paediatric Neurology, Paul Ward, Royal Belfast Hospital (...) for Sick Children Date Submitted: 29th June 2007 Date Completed: 29th June 2007 Last Modified: 29th June 2007 Status: Green (complete) Three Part Question In [a male child with speech delay who walks prior to 18 months old], does [requesting serum creatine kinase] help [diagnose Duchenne muscular dystrophy with reasonable efficiency]? Clinical Scenario Jack is a 2.5 year old boy. He has been referred for developmental assessment by his health visitor. His community paediatrician diagnoses speech

2007 BestBETS

6. Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force - Screening

Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force - Screening Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force - Screening Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force - Screening Nelson H D, Nygren P, Walker M, Panoscha R CRD summary This review (...) evaluated the effectiveness of screening for speech and language delay in pre-school children. The authors concluded that there is insufficient evidence on the optimal methods of screening and which instruments to use. Although these conclusions are likely to be reliable, they should be interpreted with some degree of caution given the possibility of language and publication bias. Authors' objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of screening and interventions for speech and language delay in pre-school

2006 DARE.

7. Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children

Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children Nelson H D, Nygren P, Walker M, Panoscha R Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Nelson H D, Nygren P, Walker M, Panoscha R. Screening (...) for speech and language delay in preschool children. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Evidence Synthesis Number 41. 2006 Authors' objectives The aim of this review was to determine the strengths and limits of evidence about the effectiveness of selecting, testing, and managing children with potential speech and language delay in the course of routine primary care. Key questions examined a chain of evidence about the accuracy and feasibility of screening children age 5 years

2006 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

8. Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force - Interventions

Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force - Interventions Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force - Interventions Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force - Interventions Nelson H D, Nygren P, Walker M, Panoscha R CRD summary (...) This review evaluated interventions for speech and language delay in pre-school children. The authors found that there were improvements in some outcomes, but conclusions and generalisability were limited. Although these conclusions are likely to be reliable, they should be interpreted with some degree of caution given the possibility of language and publication bias. Authors' objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of screening and interventions for speech and language delay in pre-school aged children

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2006 DARE.

9. The feasibility of universal screening for primary speech and language delay: findings from a systematic review of the literature

The feasibility of universal screening for primary speech and language delay: findings from a systematic review of the literature The feasibility of universal screening for primary speech and language delay: findings from a systematic review of the literature The feasibility of universal screening for primary speech and language delay: findings from a systematic review of the literature Law J, Boyle J, Harris F, Harkness A, Nye C Authors' objectives To examine the feasibility of universal (...) screening for speech and language delay. Searching EMBASE, MEDLINE, ERIC, PsycINFO, CINAHL and the Linguistics Language Behavior Abstracts were searched for literature published between 1967 and May 1997. SIGLE and the British Library's Index of Conference Proceedings were searched for unpublished literature. No search terms were reported. Study selection Study designs of evaluations included in the review No inclusion criteria were specified. The review included diagnostic accuracy studies. Specific

2000 DARE.

10. Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature

Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature Law J, Boyle J, Harris F, Harkness A, Nye C Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Law J (...) , Boyle J, Harris F, Harkness A, Nye C. Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment 1998; 2(9): 1-184 Authors' objectives Four domains (prevalence, natural history, intervention and screening) were identified as being key to a review of screening issues, with the following objectives being stated: to undertake a systematic review of research into the value of screening and intervention for speech and language delays in children up

1998 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

11. Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature

Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature Law J, Boyle J, Harris F, Harkness A, Nye C Authors' objectives To assess the value of screening and intervention for speech and language delays in children up to the age of 7 years. Two additional objectives were to identify priority areas for further (...) not include any diagnostic accuracy studies that compared the performance of the index test with a reference standard of diagnosis. Participants included in the review For effectiveness of intervention: children up to 7 years of age. For accuracy of screening: normal and clinical populations within the 0-7 year age range. Studies had to be of primary speech and language delay. Studies focusing on ADD/ADHD; deafness/sensorineural loss; autism; psychiatric or EBD; Down's Syndrome; cerebral palsy; dyslexia

1998 DARE.

12. Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature

Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature Journals Library An error has occurred in processing the XML document An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again. >> >> >> Page Not Found Page not found (404) Sorry - the page you requested could not be found. Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need

1998 NIHR HTA programme