Latest & greatest articles for Shoulder Rehabilitation

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on Shoulder Rehabilitation or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on Shoulder Rehabilitation and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for Shoulder Rehabilitation

1. The use of biofeedback on shoulder rehabilitation: a systematic review

The use of biofeedback on shoulder rehabilitation: a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation

2019 PROSPERO

2. Effect of smartphone application-supported self-rehabilitation for frozen shoulder: a prospective randomized control study

Effect of smartphone application-supported self-rehabilitation for frozen shoulder: a prospective randomized control study To evaluate the clinical efficacy of smartphone-assisted self-rehabilitation in patients with frozen shoulder.A single-center, randomized controlled trial.Orthopedic department of a university hospital.A total of 84 patients with frozen shoulder were recruited.Patients were randomly divided into two groups: a smartphone-assisted exercise group ( n = 42) and a conventional (...) self-exercise group ( n = 42). The study was performed over three months, during which each group performed home-based rehabilitation.Visual analogue scale for pain and passive shoulder range of motion were assessed at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. Technology Acceptance Model-2 and Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use scores were evaluated in the smartphone group.Initial visual analogue scale for pain of the smartphone group was 6.0 ± 2.2 and ended up with 1.8 ± 2.5 after

2019 EvidenceUpdates

3. Combined arm stretch positioning and neuromuscular electrical stimulation during rehabilitation does not improve range of motion, shoulder pain or function in patients after stroke: a randomised trial (PubMed)

Combined arm stretch positioning and neuromuscular electrical stimulation during rehabilitation does not improve range of motion, shoulder pain or function in patients after stroke: a randomised trial Does static stretch positioning combined with simultaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the subacute phase after stroke have beneficial effects on basic arm body functions and activities?Multicentre randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention (...) -to-treat analysis.Forty-six people in the subacute phase after stroke with severe arm motor deficits (initial Fugl-Meyer Assessment arm score ≤ 18).In addition to conventional stroke rehabilitation, participants in the experimental group received arm stretch positioning combined with motor amplitude NMES for two 45-minute sessions a day, five days a week, for eight weeks. Control participants received sham arm positioning (ie, no stretch) and sham NMES (ie, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2014 EvidenceUpdates Controlled trial quality: predicted high

4. The effectiveness of rehabilitation for nonoperative management of shoulder instability: a systematic review

The effectiveness of rehabilitation for nonoperative management of shoulder instability: a systematic review Untitled Document The CRD Databases will not be available from 08:00 BST on Friday 4th October until 08:00 BST on Monday 7th October for essential maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience.

2004 DARE.

5. Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for shoulder pain

Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for shoulder pain Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for shoulder pain Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for shoulder pain Philadelphia Panel Authors' objectives To determine the effectiveness of rehabilitation for shoulder pain, to develop evidence-based (...) , electrical stimulation and combined rehabilitation for patients with non-specific shoulder pain. CRD commentary The review addressed a clear question and the inclusion criteria appear appropriate. Several sources were used to identify relevant studies and attempts were made to limit language and publication bias. Methods were used to minimise bias in the study selection and data extraction processes. The validity of the included studies was assessed systematically, although it was not used to explore

2001 DARE.

6. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain among working age adults. (PubMed)

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain among working age adults. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programs for neck and shoulder pain require substantial staff and financial resources. Despite questionable scientific evidence of their effectiveness, they are widely used. Neck and shoulder complaints are common among working age adults and they are often associated with physical work load and stress. Pain in the neck and shoulder area cause (...) biopsychosocial difficulties for the patient especially if disability due to pain is prolonged. To help patients with biopsychosocial problems or to prevent their development, multidisciplinary biopsychosocial programs are applied on rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain patients. Nevertheless multidisciplinary treatment programmes are often laborious and rather long processes and require good collaboration between the patient, the rehabilitation team and the work place.The objective of this systematic

2000 Cochrane