Latest & greatest articles for Meperidine

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on Meperidine or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on Meperidine and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for Meperidine

1. Analgesic Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Meperidine in Managing Postoperative or Labor Pain: A Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Analgesic Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Meperidine in Managing Postoperative or Labor Pain: A Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Analgesic Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Meperidine in Managing Postoperative or Labor Pain: A Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily (...) Create file Cancel Your RSS Feed Name of RSS Feed: Number of items displayed: Create RSS Cancel RSS Link Copy Actions Cite Share Permalink Copy Page navigation Pain Physician Actions . 2020 Mar;23(2):175-201. Analgesic Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Meperidine in Managing Postoperative or Labor Pain: A Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials , Affiliations Expand Affiliation 1 Laboratory and Clinical Research Institute for Pain, Dept of Anesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong. PMID

2020 EvidenceUpdates

2. Meperidine to relieve shivering or bladder spasm: clinical effectiveness

Meperidine to relieve shivering or bladder spasm: clinical effectiveness Meperidine to relieve shivering or bladder spasm: clinical effectiveness Meperidine to relieve shivering or bladder spasm: clinical effectiveness CADTH Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation CADTH. Meperidine to relieve shivering or bladder spasm: clinical (...) effectiveness. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Rapid Response - Summary of Abstracts. 2013 Authors' conclusions One randomized controlled trial and one non-randomized study regarding the clinical effectiveness of meperidine for the relief of shivering in adults with brain injury undergoing hypothermia protocol were identified. No literature regarding the clinical effectiveness of meperidine for the relief of bladder spasm in adult patients following urinary catheter

2014 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

3. Meperidine to Relieve Shivering or Bladder Spasm: Clinical Effectiveness

Meperidine to Relieve Shivering or Bladder Spasm: Clinical Effectiveness Disclaimer: The Rapid Response Service is an information service for those involved in planning and providing health care in Canada. Rapid responses are based on a limited literature search and are not comprehensive, systematic reviews. The intent is to provide a list of sources of the best evidence on the topic that CADTH could identify using all reasonable efforts within the time allowed. Rapid responses should (...) study only. It may not be copied, posted on a web site, redistributed by email or stored on an electronic system without the prior written permission of CADTH or applicable copyright owner. Links: This report may contain links to other information available on the websites of third parties on the Internet. CADTH does not have control over the content of such sites. Use of third party sites is governed by the owners’ own terms and conditions. TITLE: Meperidine to Relieve Shivering or Bladder Spasm

2013 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Rapid Review

4. Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind trial (Abstract)

Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind trial The aim was to compare patients' and endoscopists' satisfaction in terms of efficacy and safety of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) during colonoscopy with that of a combination of midazolam and meperidine.Sixty patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomly assigned to two groups. All of the patients received midazolam 0.03 mg/kg intravenously for premedication (...) . In the remifentanil group, a bolus dose of remifentanil was given, and a patient-controlled sedation analgesia (PCSA) pump was set to inject further bolus doses with no "lockout" time. Patients in the meperidine group received a bolus of meperidine and sham PCSA. Non-invasive arterial blood pressure, electrocardiography, and pulse oximetry were monitored throughout the study. The Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale (OAA/S) was performed at baseline, every 5 min during, and after colonoscopy

2009 EvidenceUpdates Controlled trial quality: predicted high

5. Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial

Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial Vargo J J, Zuccaro G, Dumot J A, Shermock K M, Morrow J B, Conwell D L, Trolli P A, Maurer W G (...) Record Status This is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Each abstract contains a brief summary of the methods, the results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the study and the conclusions drawn. Health technology The use of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy compared with meperidine and midazolam. A propofol 1% emulsion (Baxter Healthcare Corp.) was given as a loading dose of either 40 mg

2002 NHS Economic Evaluation Database.