Latest & greatest articles for Hysterectomy

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on Hysterectomy or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on Hysterectomy and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for Hysterectomy

1. Short- and long term outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Short- and long term outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cervical cancer (CC) ranks 2nd for mortality among women of reproductive age in the United States. Abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) is a fertility sparing approach that has been proposed in women with early stage CC who wish to preserve their fertility. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate

2020 Archives of gynecology and obstetrics

2. Impact of vertical versus horizontal vaginal cuff closure on vaginal length following hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. (Abstract)

Impact of vertical versus horizontal vaginal cuff closure on vaginal length following hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Posthysterectomy vaginal length has been previously associated with postoperative sexual dysfunction, but evidence for this in the literature is controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether vertical or horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff has a direct effect on posthysterectomy vaginal length and on postoperative sexual (...)  cm, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.12 to -0.43]. Mean vaginal length significantly decreased when the horizontal method was used (MD -0.61 cm, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.24). The subgroup analysis revealed that vertical closure was associated with longer vaginal length only in cases treated with vaginal hysterectomy. Trial sequential analysis revealed that our meta-analysis had adequate power to support these results. Postoperative sexual function was evaluated in only one study; no differences were

2020 International urogynecology journal

3. Total Versus Subtotal Hysterectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Intraoperative Outcomes and Postoperative Short-term Events. (Abstract)

Total Versus Subtotal Hysterectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Intraoperative Outcomes and Postoperative Short-term Events. The benefits and disadvantages of cervical extraction during hysterectomy are unclear in the literature. We intended to compare total (TH) with subtotal or supracervical (SH) hysterectomy regarding intraoperative and postoperative outcomes (quality of life, sexual function, pain and cyclical bleeding).A systematic literature search for randomized controlled (...) were similar in both total and subtotal hysterectomy groups up to 12 months follow up.Overall perioperative outcomes favored the preservation of the cervix during hysterectomy but women that had SH are more susceptible to present cyclical vaginal bleeding mimicking menstruation. Those factors should be taken into account along with patient's needs and expectations prior to selecting the procedure.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

2020 Clinical therapeutics

4. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies. (Abstract)

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies. A meta-analysis was performed to assess risks of intraoperative and postoperative urologic complications in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH).We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies published up to December, 2018. Manual searches of related articles and relevant (...) complications compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) was 1.40 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.87]. The OR of LRH for postoperative complication risk compared to ARH was 1.35 [95% CI 1.01-1.80]. However, significant adverse effects of intraoperative urologic complications in LRH were not observed among articles published after 2012 (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.77-1.62) in cumulative meta-analysis or subgroup analysis. The incidence of bladder injury was statistically higher than that of ureter injury (p

2020 Surgical endoscopy

5. Early versus delayed urinary catheter removal after hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Early versus delayed urinary catheter removal after hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In bladder drainage, an essential part of post-hysterectomy care, the optimal timing for removing the urinary catheter is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the risks and benefits of early (<6 h) vs delayed (>6 h) catheter removal post-hysterectomy.A systematic review searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception till May 2019 for randomised trials of women undergoing (...) hysterectomy. We reported on urinary retention, positive urine culture, urinary tract infection (UTI) (defined by symptoms and/or antibiotic use), post-operative pyrexia, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay. We assessed risk of bias in included trials and used a random-effect model to generate risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).Of 1020 potentially relevant citations, we included 10 randomised

2020 European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology

6. Interventions to reduce morbidity from vault hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Interventions to reduce morbidity from vault hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A frequent complication following vaginal hysterectomy is the formation of vaginal vault hematoma. The objective of our systematic review was to assess the impact of various interventions in reducing the incidence of vault hematoma or postoperative febrile morbidity following vaginal hysterectomy.We carried out a systematic search of Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, HTA (...) database, PROSPERO, meta-Register of Controlled Trials (mRCT), PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, conference abstracts, and a hand search of journals from inception until September 2018. Our search strategy included interventions in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with modified vault closure with inclusion of peritoneal edges, vaginal vault drainage, or vaginal packing to reduce the incidence of clinically significant vault hematomas. Two independent reviewers (SR and AD) extracted data using

2020 International urogynecology journal

7. Hysterectomy and risk of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Hysterectomy and risk of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The association between hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease and ovarian cancer risk was controversial. Thus, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of hysterectomy and ovarian cancer risk.PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from 2000 toJanuary 2018. A random-effect model was used to obtain the summary odds risks (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).A total (...) of 18 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. We found that there was no statistical significance for ovarian cancer risk following hysterectomy (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.83-1.12). And in subgroup analysis, the protective effects were observed for invasive endometrioid/clear cell carcinomas after hysterectomy (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51, 0.94; I2 = 0%), and no statistical significance for serous and mucinous.Hysterectomy showed no relationship with ovarian cancer. But a reduced risk was found

2020 Archives of gynecology and obstetrics

8. Hysteroscopic endometrial resection vs. hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding: impact on quality of life and sexuality. Evidence from a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. (Abstract)

Hysteroscopic endometrial resection vs. hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding: impact on quality of life and sexuality. Evidence from a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of hysterectomy and hysteroscopic endometrial resection in improving quality of life (QoL), sexual function and psychological wellbeing of women abnormal uterine bleeding.We performed a systematic literature (...) search in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase for original studies written in English (registered in PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019133632), using the terms 'endometrial ablation', 'endometrial destruction', 'endometrial resection', 'hysterectomy', 'menorrhagia', 'dysfunctional uterine bleeding', 'quality of life', 'sexuality' published up to April 2019. Our literature search produced 159 records. After exclusions, nine studies were included showing the following results: both types of treatment significantly improve

2020 Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology

9. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Introduction: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of uterine artery embolization (UAE) compared with conventional hysterectomy on refractory postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database (CNKI), Cochrane Library, and Wanfang (...) database through October 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing the safety and effectiveness of UAE compared with hysterectomy on refractory PPH. The main outcome measures included the blood loss, operating time, hemostatic effective rate, and length of stay.Results: Six RCTs and nine observational studies were included in the meta-analysis, which involved 1142 women with refractory PPH. The results demonstrated that UAE was more beneficial on refractory PPH

2020 The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians

10. Pelvic floor symptoms 5 to 14 years after total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Pelvic floor symptoms 5 to 14 years after total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. We aim to compare total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy regarding urinary and bowel symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse at long-term follow-up.A systematic literature search was performed on the MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane CENTRAL and SCOPUS databases and conference abstracts (AAGL, AUGS, ICS) from inception up to November 2017. We included randomized (...) trials comparing total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions that evaluated pelvic floor symptoms over 5 years of follow-up. Risk of bias and GRADE assessment for quality of evidence were performed.We included four studies involving 566 participants with follow-up ranging from 5 to 14 years. Women who underwent total hysterectomy presented lower risk of reported urinary incontinence [RR 0.74 (CI = 0.58, 0.94) i2 0%; p = 0.02] and stress urinary incontinence [RR 0.84 (CI = 0.71, 0.99) i2

2020 International urogynecology journal

11. Urinary incontinence following subtotal and total hysterectomy: a systematic review. (Full text)

Urinary incontinence following subtotal and total hysterectomy: a systematic review. To evaluate the best surgical approach for the female urinary incontinence.Systematic review conducted in MEDLINE® Cochrane, EMBASE and LILACS database up to September 1st, 2017. Articles were selected according to study type, type of intervention and outcomes. Articles were selected by more than one researcher based on title, abstract and full text. The SIGN checklist was used for bias assessment.A total (...) of 165 articles were retrieved from MEDLINE® . Twenty-five studies were elected for full text reading, and 11 of them were selected for the final text analysis. The heterogeneity between questionnaires used in different studies precluded a meta-analysis of results.This study yielded evidences supporting the hypothesis that total and subtotal hysterectomy have different impacts on urinary function of patients with benign uterine diseases. Articles revealed higher frequency of urinary incontinence

2020 Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) PubMed abstract

12. Perioperative Interventions to Minimize Blood Loss at the Time of Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Perioperative Interventions to Minimize Blood Loss at the Time of Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma(s) is associated with significant morbidity including blood loss. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify nonhormonal interventions, perioperative surgical interventions, and devices to minimize blood loss at the time of hysterectomy for leiomyoma.Librarian-led search of Embase, MEDLINE, Web (...) of Science, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane databases from 1946 to 2018 with hand-guided updates.Included studies reported on keywords of hysterectomy, leiomyoma, and operative blood loss/postoperative hemorrhage/uterine bleeding/metrorrhagia/hematoma. The review excluded a comparison of route of hysterectomy, morcellation, vaginal cuff closure, hormonal medications, vessel sealing devices for vaginal hysterectomy, and case series with <10 patients.Surgical

2020 Journal of minimally invasive gynecology

13. Primary radical hysterectomy vs chemoradiation for IB2-IIA cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (Full text)

Primary radical hysterectomy vs chemoradiation for IB2-IIA cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. To compare the clinical outcomes of radical hysterectomy (RH) with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in women with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer.Based on articles published up to December 2017, a literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases was conducted to identify eligible

2020 Medicine PubMed abstract

14. Vascular balloon occlusion and planned caesarean hysterectomy for morbidly adherent placenta: A systematic review. (Abstract)

Vascular balloon occlusion and planned caesarean hysterectomy for morbidly adherent placenta: A systematic review. Morbidly adherent placenta is potentially life-threatening, often requiring technically difficult surgery and large blood loss. Use of intravascular balloon occlusion with or without hysterectomy to reduce blood loss is increasing despite associated morbidity and lack of evidence of efficacy.To evaluate if prophylactic use of vascular balloon occlusion at the time of planned (...) caesarean hysterectomy for antenatally diagnosed morbidly adherent placenta reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements, and determine rate of associated complications.A systematic review of PubMed and Medline covering January 1997 to December 2018 was conducted. Key words included placenta accreta, increta, percreta, and morbidly adherent placenta, balloon, interventional radiology, embolization, and caesarean hysterectomy.Nineteen studies were included. Only three studies had appropriate controls

2020 The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology

15. Perioperative Complications of Hysterectomy After a Previous Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (Full text)

Perioperative Complications of Hysterectomy After a Previous Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. With increasing rates of cesarean sections (CS), the number of hysterectomies performed among women with a previous CS is on the rise.To provide the association between the odds of complications following a hysterectomy performed later in life and a previous CS.A comprehensive search was performed using major electronic databases, ie, MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, from (...) ), reoperation (pooled unadjusted OR=1.46, 95% CI=1.19-1.78, 2 studies, 9,899 women), and blood transfusion (pooled unadjusted OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.03-1.76, 7 studies, 13,430 women).Previous CS increases risks of various complications following hysterectomy. This information reminds the gynecologists to be aware of the associations between previous CS and potential complications among women undergoing hysterectomy.CRD42018085061.© 2019 Rattanakanokchai et al.

2020 Clinical epidemiology PubMed abstract

16. Infectious complications of laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Infectious complications of laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of the infectious complications of hysterectomy, comparing robotic-assisted hysterectomy to conventional laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy.We searched PubMed, CINAHL, CDSR, and EMBASE through July 2018 for studies evaluating robotic-assisted hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy, and infectious (...) complications. We employed random-effect models to obtain pooled OR estimates. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 estimation and the Cochran Q statistic. Pooled ORs were calculated separately based on the reason for hysterectomy (eg, benign uterine diseases, endometrial cancer, and cervical cancer).Fifty studies were included in the final review for the meta-analysis with 176 016 patients undergoing hysterectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of infectious complication

2020 International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society

17. Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Abstract)

Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Single-site hysterectomy (SSH) laparoscopic or robotic presented distinct advantages with regards to postoperative cosmetic outcome, wound-related complications and morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of robotic and laparoscopic SSH in patients with benign or early-stage malignant gynecological conditions and to compare the two approaches. A systematic search of four electronic databases (...) for articles published up to September 2019 was performed. Studies reporting outcomes for women who underwent robotic or laparoscopic SSH were considered eligible. A total of 6 studies with 412 patients were included. Among them, 150 women had robotic SSH, whereas 262 had laparoscopic SSH. Neither total operative time nor total hysterectomy time were found different among the 2 groups (355 patients MD 17.47 min, 95% CI - 5.82 to 40.76, p = 0.14 and 285 patients MD 6.41 min, 95% CI - 10.24 to 23.06, p

2020 Journal of Robotic Surgery

18. Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (Full text)

Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The aim of the present study was to compare the oncological outcome of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) and conventional radical hysterectomy (CRH) for early-stage cervical cancer using a meta-analysis. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, including 4 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 8 case-control and 11

2020 Molecular and clinical oncology PubMed abstract

19. Keyhole hysterectomy is effective for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. (Abstract)

Keyhole hysterectomy is effective for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. The studyCooper K, Breeman S, Scott NW, et al. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HEALTH): a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019;394:1425-36.The study was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 12/35/23).To read the full NIHR Signal, go to: https://discover.dc.nihr.ac.uk/content (...) /signal-000837/keyhole-hysterectomy-is-effective-for-women-with-heavy-menstrual-bleeding.Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

2020 BMJ

20. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications

Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer Patients With Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Conversions and Complications - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Welcome to the new PubMed. For legacy PubMed go to . Clipboard (...) collection: Name must be less than 100 characters Choose a collection: Unable to load your collection due to an error Add Cancel Add to My Bibliography My Bibliography Unable to load your delegates due to an error Add Cancel Actions Cite Share Permalink Copy Page navigation Review Am J Obstet Gynecol Actions , 221 (5), 410-428.e19 Nov 2019 Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer Patients With Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Conversions and Complications

2020 EvidenceUpdates