## How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

- 123,688 results
- Evidence type
- Clinical Area

Use check boxes to select individual results below

## SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show### 104001. Association between Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms in TLR4 gene and type 2 diabetes mellitus: case-control study and meta-analysis

of publication, language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio (...) of linear regression of time-to-treatment by performing stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104002. Assistive technology, including orthotic devices, for the management of contractures in adult stroke patients [Cochrane Protocol]

of publication, language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio (...) of linear regression of time-to-treatment by performing stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104003. Assessment of the effectiveness of mouthwashes in reducing cariogenic biofilm in orthodontic patients: a systematic review

, language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect (...) of time-to-treatment by performing stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104004. Assessment of peripheral skeletal muscle architecture in critically ill patients using ultrasound: a systematic review

, language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect (...) of time-to-treatment by performing stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104005. Association of atopy/allergy and dengue infection: a systemic review and meta-analysis

to be extracted: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104006. Association between sleep and all cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

to be extracted: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104007. Association between irrigation fluids, washout volumes and risk of local recurrence of anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 427 cases and 492 controls

points). We will test the robustness of linear regression of time-to-treatment by performing stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the

**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel (...) authors by e-mail (max. 2 attempts). In case an outcome is measured at multiple time points, data from the time point where efficacy is highest will be included. ">Methods for data extraction Example: Experimental groups, control group(s) and number of animals per group. ">Data to be extracted: study design Example: Species, sex,**weight**, age, co‐morbidity, anaesthetic agent used, method of induction of cardiac ischemia, duration of ischemia and duration of reperfusion (if applicable). ">Data#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104008. Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: a meta-epidemiological study

to be extracted: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104009. Aseptic loosening in patients with total or uni knee arthroplasty: a diagnostic imaging test accuracy review

, language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect (...) of time-to-treatment by performing stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104010. Arthroplasty versus ACDF for cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

**mean**

**difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the

**mean**

**difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias

#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104011. Autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction: a systematic review

**mean**

**difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the

**mean**

**difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias

#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104012. Autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction [Cochrane Protocol]

: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104013. Association between fiber intake and coronary heart disease risk

: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104014. Assessing the relationship between chronic pain and cardiovascular disease: a protocol for a systematic review

**mean**

**difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect (...) of time-to-treatment by performing stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the

**mean**

**difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression

#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104015. Assessing the quality of information about bladder pain syndrome available on the Internet: a systematic review

**mean**

**difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect (...) of time-to-treatment by performing stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the

**mean**

**difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression

#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104016. Patients experiences of care dependency: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

**mean**

**difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the

**mean**

**difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias

#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104017. Patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty: which one(s) should we be using

**mean**

**difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the

**mean**

**difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias

#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104018. Patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review

: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized

**mean****difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the**mean****difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104019. Neural correlates between smoking and depression - a systematic review of functional imaging studies

**mean**

**difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the

**mean**

**difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias

#### 2013 PROSPERO

### 104020. Network meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the treatments of intracapsular femoral neck fractures

**mean**

**difference**; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model (...) stratified analysis (treatment pre-ischemia vs during vs post-ischemia). We will assess the effect of our decision to pool all reported scales for histological damage by re-running the analyses using only data from studies using the Jablonski scale. ">Sensitivity Example: For meta-analyses using the

**mean**

**difference**or risk ration as effect measure and containing at least 20 studies, we will produce funnel plots and assess publication bias using Egger’s regression test. ">Publication bias

#### 2013 PROSPERO

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>