How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

45,750 results for

Quality Guidelines

by
...
Latest & greatest
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

1. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care PEDIATRICS Volume 143, number 1, January 2019:e20183310 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS The American Academy of Pediatrics has endorsed the following publication: National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care, National Consensus Project. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. 4th ed. Richmond, VA: National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care; 2018. Available at: www. nationalcoalition hpc. org/ ncp (...) . All statements of endorsement from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, retired, or revised at or before that time. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care To cite: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. Pediatrics. 2019;143(1):e20183310 DOI: https:// doi. or g/ 10. 1542/ peds. 2018- 3310 PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275). Copyright © 2019 by the American Academy

2019 American Academy of Pediatrics

2. The methodological quality of guideline recommendations on vitamin D and calcium intakes: a systematic review of food-based dietary guidelines and osteoporosis prevention guidelines

The methodological quality of guideline recommendations on vitamin D and calcium intakes: a systematic review of food-based dietary guidelines and osteoporosis prevention guidelines Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility

2019 PROSPERO

3. Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Management

Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Management | Cancer Care Ontario Google Tag Manager You are using an outdated browser. We suggest you update your browser for a better experience. for update. Browse Guidelines Browse Pathway Maps Sort by You are here / / Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Management Guidelines & Advice (...) Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Management english Version: 2 ID: 17-3 Oct 2017 Type of Content: Guidelines & Advice, Clinical Document Status: Current Authors: J. Chin, J. Srigley, L.A. Mayhew, R.B. Rumble, C. Crossley, A. Hunter, N. Fleshner, B. Bora, R. McLeod, S. McNair, B. Langer, A. Evans, Prostate Cancer Surgery and Pathology Expert Panel Guideline Objective The objective of this document is to provide

2017 Cancer Care Ontario

4. Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia Background Paper

Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia Background Paper PS58 BP 2018 Page 1 PS58 BP 2018 Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia Background Paper 1. INTRODUCTION This document, previously TE09, was reprinted in 2012 as PS58; however, it was not reviewed at that time. With rising community expectations as well as the emphasis of continuing professional development (CPD (...) ) on practice evaluation the accompanying guidelines were reviewed to ensure that these demands are met. Fellows place significant importance on evidence-based practice and there are two separate goals that need to be achieved. The first is quality assurance (QA), which refers to minimum standards, and the second is quality improvement (QI), which promotes continuing advancement of individual performance 1 . Many of the ANZCA professional documents inform QA through the provision of guidelines and expected

2016 Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists

5. Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia

Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia PS58 2018 Page 1 PS58 2018 Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia 1. PURPOSE The aim of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving the highest quality of care for their patients through an understanding of Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Improvement (QI). 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1. It is incumbent upon Fellows at an individual, departmental and institutional level to contribute (...) . ? Review involves monitoring the outcome of actions, to “close the loop”. Showing the outcome or impact of a QA program on health care is an important component of the program. ? Setting (or revising) standards (or policies) involves incorporating the improvements achieved into new or revised official regulations, guidelines, or standards. 6.4 Examples of quality improvement projects One typical type of QI project attempts to improve a selected aspect of patient care by using an iterative feedback loop

2016 Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists

6. Correction: Screening for osteoporosis: A systematic assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines, using the AGREE II instrument and the IOM Standards for Trustworthy Guidelines. (PubMed)

Correction: Screening for osteoporosis: A systematic assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines, using the AGREE II instrument and the IOM Standards for Trustworthy Guidelines. [This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208251.].

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2019 PLoS ONE

7. How good are low back pain guidelines? A critical appraisal of the quality of clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II tool

How good are low back pain guidelines? A critical appraisal of the quality of clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II tool Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record

2019 PROSPERO

8. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition

Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it. Toggle navigation Toggle navigation Search Browse Statistics Related Links Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition, 1st add, 4th ed View/ Open Rights View Statistics Altmetrics Share Citation World Health Organization (...) . (‎2017)‎. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition, 1st add, 4th ed. . License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO Description 123 p. ISBN 9789241550017 Collections Language English Metadata Related items Showing items related by title and MeSH subject.  World Health Organization (‎ WHO/HSE/WSH/10.01/10 , 2010 )‎  Regional Committee for the Western Pacific, 035 (‎ WPR/RC35.R15 , 1984 )‎  World Health Organization (‎ WHO/HSE/WSH/09.01/4 , 2009 )‎ View Item

2017 WHO

9. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum

Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it. Toggle navigation Toggle navigation Search Browse Statistics Related Links Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum, 4th ed + 1st add View/ Open Rights View Statistics Altmetrics Share Citation (...) World Health Organization . (‎2017)‎. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum, 4th ed + 1st add. World Health Organization. . License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO Description 541 p. ISBN 9789241549950 Other Language Versions Collections Language English Metadata Related items Showing items related by title and MeSH subject.  World Health Organization (‎ WHO/HSE/WSH/10.01/10 , 2010 )‎  Regional Committee for the Western Pacific, 035 (‎ WPR/RC35.R15 , 1984

2017 WHO

10. 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (...) and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care , MD, FAHA, Chair , MD , MD, FAHA , MD , MD , MD, MPH , MD, MSc , MS , MD, MEd , and MD, MPH, PhD MD, MPH Dianne L. Atkins , Allan R. de Caen , Stuart Berger , Ricardo A. Samson , Stephen M. Schexnayder , Benny L. JoynerJr , Blair L. Bigham , Dana E. Niles , Jonathan P. Duff , Elizabeth A. Hunt , and Peter A. Meaney Originally published 6 Nov 2017

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 American Heart Association

11. 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardio pulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardio pulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care | Circulation (...) and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care , MD, Chair , MD, MSc, FAHA , MD, MPH , DO , MD, FAHA , MD, MMEd , MPA, NRP , MD, MPH , MD, PhD , and MSN, RN, FAHA MD, MSc Monica E. Kleinman , Zachary D. Goldberger , Thomas Rea , Robert A. Swor , Bentley J. Bobrow , Erin E. Brennan , Mark Terry , Robin Hemphill , Raúl J. Gazmuri , Mary Fran Hazinski , and Andrew H. Travers Originally published 6

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 American Heart Association

12. Screening for osteoporosis: A systematic assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines, using the AGREE II instrument and the IOM Standards for Trustworthy Guidelines. (PubMed)

Screening for osteoporosis: A systematic assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines, using the AGREE II instrument and the IOM Standards for Trustworthy Guidelines. Numerous clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are published to guide management of osteoporosis. Little is known about their quality or how recommendations have changed over time.To systematically assess the quality and content of the guidelines on screening for osteoporosis, using the Appraisal (...) of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool, and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) standards for trustworthy guidelines.We conducted a systematic search for osteoporosis CPGs published between 2002-2016, using multiple databases and guideline websites. Two reviewers appraised the quality of eligible CPGs using the AGREE II. High quality CPGs were considered if they scored ≥ 60 in four or more domains including the domain for rigor of development. Non-parametric tests were used to test

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 PLoS ONE

13. Assessing the quality of guidelines for primary aldosteronism: which guidelines are worth applying in diverse settings? (PubMed)

Assessing the quality of guidelines for primary aldosteronism: which guidelines are worth applying in diverse settings? To review the validity and applicability of clinical guidelines on the management of primary aldosteronism and to list their discrepancies to allow health-care providers and guideline developers to make informed decisions.Primary aldosteronism management guidelines, including specialist, subgroup, general guidelines written in English, were obtained from electronic databases (...) . Appraisers independently extracted the data, and used the Appraisal Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria to independently evaluate the methodological quality of the guidelines. Then, the appraisers used the Guideline Implementability Appraisal (GLIA) tool to assess the implementation of the guidelines that complied with AGREE-II and IOM. In addition, we further compared the discrepancies in the primary aldosteronism management

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2019 Journal of Hypertension

14. Are clinical guidelines designed according to guidelines? Cross-sectional assessment of quality and transparency of clinical guidelines in urology. (PubMed)

Are clinical guidelines designed according to guidelines? Cross-sectional assessment of quality and transparency of clinical guidelines in urology. Guidelines and recommendations become increasingly important in clinical urologic practice. This study aims to inform clinicians using guidelines on how to evaluate the quality of the methodology and transparency of these documents.The guidelines on management of castration-resistant prostate cancer of the American Urology Association, European (...) Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, European Society of Medical Oncology were reviewed using the AGREE-II tool (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation). We reported and compared the domain scores for the domains 1 scope and purpose, 2 stakeholder involvement, 3 rigor of development, 4 clarity of presentation, 5 applicability, and 6 editorial independence (100% indicates highest-best quality score).The domains

2018 World journal of urology

15. Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar guidelines and health economic modelling

B, Thompson A, Dumbreck S, Flynn A, Alderson P, Nairn M, Treweek S & Payne K Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Guthrie B, Thompson A, Dumbreck S, Flynn A, Alderson P, Nairn M, Treweek S & Payne K. Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar (...) Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar guidelines and health economic modelling Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar guidelines and health economic modelling Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar guidelines and health economic modelling Guthrie

2017 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

16. Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care

Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: 2018 update | CMAJ Main menu User menu Search Search for this keyword Search for this keyword Guideline Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C (...) -CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: 2018 update Sheldon W. Tobe , James A. Stone , Todd Anderson , Simon Bacon , Alice Y.Y. Cheng , Stella S. Daskalopoulou , Justin A. Ezekowitz , Jean C. Gregoire , Gord Gubitz , Rahul Jain , Karim Keshavjee , Patty Lindsay , Mary L’Abbe , David C.W. Lau , Lawrence A. Leiter , Eileen O’Meara , Glen J. Pearson , Doreen M. Rabi , Diana Sherifali , Peter Selby , Jack V. Tu , Sean Wharton , Kimberly M. Walker

2018 CPG Infobase

17. Quality of WHO guidelines on snakebite: the neglect continues (PubMed)

Quality of WHO guidelines on snakebite: the neglect continues 29662699 2018 11 14 2059-7908 3 2 2018 BMJ global health BMJ Glob Health Quality of WHO guidelines on snakebite: the neglect continues. e000783 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000783 Bhaumik Soumyadeep S BMJ Global Health, London, UK. Jagadesh Soushieta S UMR Borea, Institut de recherche pour le developpement, Cayenne, French Guiana, France. Lassi Zohra Z The Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia (...) , Australia. eng Journal Article 2018 04 09 England BMJ Glob Health 101685275 2059-7908 health policies and all other topics snake bite, stings and other evenoming systematic review Competing interests: SB and ZL have conducted systematic reviews for informing WHO guidelines for other diseases. 2018 02 19 2018 03 18 2018 03 24 2018 4 18 6 0 2018 4 18 6 0 2018 4 18 6 1 epublish 29662699 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000783 bmjgh-2018-000783 PMC5898301 Wilderness Environ Med. 2014 Mar;25(1):35-40 24412659 Lancet. 2007

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 BMJ global health

18. Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines with physical activity recommendations for people diagnosed with cancer: A systematic critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool. (PubMed)

Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines with physical activity recommendations for people diagnosed with cancer: A systematic critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool. Evidence suggests physical activity (PA) is beneficial for people diagnosed with cancer. Clinical practice guidelines provide specific recommendations based on available research and are useful in informing evidence-based practice and guiding future research. Little is known on the extent and quality (...) of guidelines on PA targeted to the cancer population. The objectives of this systematic review were to: 1) identify recent clinical practice guidelines including PA or exercise recommendations for people with cancer and 2) critically appraise the methodological quality of the included guidelines. A systematic search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PEDro) and supplementary sources was conducted. Two reviewers independently scanned articles and selected guidelines for inclusion

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2019 PLoS ONE

19. Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE instrument in Japan: A time trend analysis. (PubMed)

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE instrument in Japan: A time trend analysis. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are representative methods for promoting the standardization of healthcare and improvement of its quality. Few studies have investigated changes in the quality of CPGs published in a country over time. Our aim was to investigate changes in the quality of CPGs over time in the context of the available infrastructure for CPG development, public (...) interest in healthcare quality, and healthcare providers' responses to this interest.All CPGs pertaining to evidence-based medicine (EBM) issued between 2000 and 2014 in Japan (n = 373) were evaluated using the Japanese version of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) I. Additionally, time trends in quality were analyzed. Using a cut-off point based on the publication year of CPG development literature, the evaluated CPGs were classified into those published until 2008 (pre

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2019 PLoS ONE

20. Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use. (PubMed)

Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use. The AGREE II instrument is the most commonly used guideline appraisal tool. It includes 23 appraisal criteria (items) organized within six domains. AGREE II also includes two overall assessments (overall guideline quality, recommendation for use). Our aim was to investigate how strongly the 23 AGREE II items influence the two (...) overall assessments.An online survey of authors of publications on guideline appraisals with AGREE II and guideline users from a German scientific network was conducted between 10th February 2015 and 30th March 2015. Participants were asked to rate the influence of the AGREE II items on a Likert scale (0 = no influence to 5 = very strong influence). The frequencies of responses and their dispersion were presented descriptively.Fifty-eight of the 376 persons contacted (15.4%) participated in the survey

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 BMC health services research

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>