How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

45,357 results for

Quality Guidelines

by
...
Latest & greatest
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

1. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care PEDIATRICS Volume 143, number 1, January 2019:e20183310 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS The American Academy of Pediatrics has endorsed the following publication: National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care, National Consensus Project. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. 4th ed. Richmond, VA: National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care; 2018. Available at: www. nationalcoalition hpc. org/ ncp (...) . All statements of endorsement from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, retired, or revised at or before that time. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care To cite: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. Pediatrics. 2019;143(1):e20183310 DOI: https:// doi. or g/ 10. 1542/ peds. 2018- 3310 PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275). Copyright © 2019 by the American Academy

2019 American Academy of Pediatrics

2. Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Management

Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Management | Cancer Care Ontario Google Tag Manager You are using an outdated browser. We suggest you update your browser for a better experience. for update. Browse Guidelines Browse Pathway Maps Sort by You are here / / Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Management Guidelines & Advice (...) Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Management english Version: 2 ID: 17-3 Oct 2017 Type of Content: Guidelines & Advice, Clinical Document Status: Current Authors: J. Chin, J. Srigley, L.A. Mayhew, R.B. Rumble, C. Crossley, A. Hunter, N. Fleshner, B. Bora, R. McLeod, S. McNair, B. Langer, A. Evans, Prostate Cancer Surgery and Pathology Expert Panel Guideline Objective The objective of this document is to provide

2017 Cancer Care Ontario

3. Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia Background Paper

Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia Background Paper PS58 BP 2018 Page 1 PS58 BP 2018 Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia Background Paper 1. INTRODUCTION This document, previously TE09, was reprinted in 2012 as PS58; however, it was not reviewed at that time. With rising community expectations as well as the emphasis of continuing professional development (CPD (...) ) on practice evaluation the accompanying guidelines were reviewed to ensure that these demands are met. Fellows place significant importance on evidence-based practice and there are two separate goals that need to be achieved. The first is quality assurance (QA), which refers to minimum standards, and the second is quality improvement (QI), which promotes continuing advancement of individual performance 1 . Many of the ANZCA professional documents inform QA through the provision of guidelines and expected

2016 Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists

4. Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia

Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia PS58 2018 Page 1 PS58 2018 Guidelines on Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement in Anaesthesia 1. PURPOSE The aim of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving the highest quality of care for their patients through an understanding of Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Improvement (QI). 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1. It is incumbent upon Fellows at an individual, departmental and institutional level to contribute (...) . ? Review involves monitoring the outcome of actions, to “close the loop”. Showing the outcome or impact of a QA program on health care is an important component of the program. ? Setting (or revising) standards (or policies) involves incorporating the improvements achieved into new or revised official regulations, guidelines, or standards. 6.4 Examples of quality improvement projects One typical type of QI project attempts to improve a selected aspect of patient care by using an iterative feedback loop

2016 Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists

5. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition

Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it. Toggle navigation Toggle navigation Search Browse Statistics Related Links Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition, 1st add, 4th ed View/ Open Rights View Statistics Altmetrics Share Citation World Health Organization (...) . (‎2017)‎. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition, 1st add, 4th ed. . License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO Description 123 p. ISBN 9789241550017 Collections Language English Metadata Related items Showing items related by title and MeSH subject.  World Health Organization (‎ WHO/HSE/WSH/10.01/10 , 2010 )‎  Regional Committee for the Western Pacific, 035 (‎ WPR/RC35.R15 , 1984 )‎  World Health Organization (‎ WHO/HSE/WSH/09.01/4 , 2009 )‎ View Item

2017 WHO

6. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum

Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it. Toggle navigation Toggle navigation Search Browse Statistics Related Links Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum, 4th ed + 1st add View/ Open Rights View Statistics Altmetrics Share Citation (...) World Health Organization . (‎2017)‎. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum, 4th ed + 1st add. World Health Organization. . License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO Description 541 p. ISBN 9789241549950 Other Language Versions Collections Language English Metadata Related items Showing items related by title and MeSH subject.  World Health Organization (‎ WHO/HSE/WSH/10.01/10 , 2010 )‎  Regional Committee for the Western Pacific, 035 (‎ WPR/RC35.R15 , 1984

2017 WHO

7. 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (...) and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care , MD, FAHA, Chair , MD , MD, FAHA , MD , MD , MD, MPH , MD, MSc , MS , MD, MEd , and MD, MPH, PhD MD, MPH Dianne L. Atkins , Allan R. de Caen , Stuart Berger , Ricardo A. Samson , Stephen M. Schexnayder , Benny L. JoynerJr , Blair L. Bigham , Dana E. Niles , Jonathan P. Duff , Elizabeth A. Hunt , and Peter A. Meaney Originally published 6 Nov 2017

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 American Heart Association

8. 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardio pulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardio pulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care | Circulation (...) and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care , MD, Chair , MD, MSc, FAHA , MD, MPH , DO , MD, FAHA , MD, MMEd , MPA, NRP , MD, MPH , MD, PhD , and MSN, RN, FAHA MD, MSc Monica E. Kleinman , Zachary D. Goldberger , Thomas Rea , Robert A. Swor , Bentley J. Bobrow , Erin E. Brennan , Mark Terry , Robin Hemphill , Raúl J. Gazmuri , Mary Fran Hazinski , and Andrew H. Travers Originally published 6

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 American Heart Association

9. Screening for osteoporosis: A systematic assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines, using the AGREE II instrument and the IOM Standards for Trustworthy Guidelines. (PubMed)

Screening for osteoporosis: A systematic assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines, using the AGREE II instrument and the IOM Standards for Trustworthy Guidelines. Numerous clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are published to guide management of osteoporosis. Little is known about their quality or how recommendations have changed over time.To systematically assess the quality and content of the guidelines on screening for osteoporosis, using the Appraisal (...) of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool, and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) standards for trustworthy guidelines.We conducted a systematic search for osteoporosis CPGs published between 2002-2016, using multiple databases and guideline websites. Two reviewers appraised the quality of eligible CPGs using the AGREE II. High quality CPGs were considered if they scored ≥ 60 in four or more domains including the domain for rigor of development. Non-parametric tests were used to test

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 PLoS ONE

10. Assessing the quality of guidelines for primary aldosteronism: which guidelines are worth applying in diverse settings? (PubMed)

Assessing the quality of guidelines for primary aldosteronism: which guidelines are worth applying in diverse settings? To review the validity and applicability of clinical guidelines on the management of primary aldosteronism and to list their discrepancies to allow health-care providers and guideline developers to make informed decisions.Primary aldosteronism management guidelines, including specialist, subgroup, general guidelines written in English, were obtained from electronic databases (...) . Appraisers independently extracted the data, and used the Appraisal Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria to independently evaluate the methodological quality of the guidelines. Then, the appraisers used the Guideline Implementability Appraisal (GLIA) tool to assess the implementation of the guidelines that complied with AGREE-II and IOM. In addition, we further compared the discrepancies in the primary aldosteronism management

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2019 Journal of Hypertension

11. Are clinical guidelines designed according to guidelines? Cross-sectional assessment of quality and transparency of clinical guidelines in urology. (PubMed)

Are clinical guidelines designed according to guidelines? Cross-sectional assessment of quality and transparency of clinical guidelines in urology. Guidelines and recommendations become increasingly important in clinical urologic practice. This study aims to inform clinicians using guidelines on how to evaluate the quality of the methodology and transparency of these documents.The guidelines on management of castration-resistant prostate cancer of the American Urology Association, European (...) Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, European Society of Medical Oncology were reviewed using the AGREE-II tool (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation). We reported and compared the domain scores for the domains 1 scope and purpose, 2 stakeholder involvement, 3 rigor of development, 4 clarity of presentation, 5 applicability, and 6 editorial independence (100% indicates highest-best quality score).The domains

2018 World journal of urology

12. Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar guidelines and health economic modelling

B, Thompson A, Dumbreck S, Flynn A, Alderson P, Nairn M, Treweek S & Payne K Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Guthrie B, Thompson A, Dumbreck S, Flynn A, Alderson P, Nairn M, Treweek S & Payne K. Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar (...) Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar guidelines and health economic modelling Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar guidelines and health economic modelling Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar guidelines and health economic modelling Guthrie

2017 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

13. Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care

Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: 2018 update | CMAJ Main menu User menu Search Search for this keyword Search for this keyword Guideline Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C (...) -CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: 2018 update Sheldon W. Tobe , James A. Stone , Todd Anderson , Simon Bacon , Alice Y.Y. Cheng , Stella S. Daskalopoulou , Justin A. Ezekowitz , Jean C. Gregoire , Gord Gubitz , Rahul Jain , Karim Keshavjee , Patty Lindsay , Mary L’Abbe , David C.W. Lau , Lawrence A. Leiter , Eileen O’Meara , Glen J. Pearson , Doreen M. Rabi , Diana Sherifali , Peter Selby , Jack V. Tu , Sean Wharton , Kimberly M. Walker

2018 CPG Infobase

14. Quality of WHO guidelines on snakebite: the neglect continues (PubMed)

Quality of WHO guidelines on snakebite: the neglect continues 29662699 2018 11 14 2059-7908 3 2 2018 BMJ global health BMJ Glob Health Quality of WHO guidelines on snakebite: the neglect continues. e000783 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000783 Bhaumik Soumyadeep S BMJ Global Health, London, UK. Jagadesh Soushieta S UMR Borea, Institut de recherche pour le developpement, Cayenne, French Guiana, France. Lassi Zohra Z The Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia (...) , Australia. eng Journal Article 2018 04 09 England BMJ Glob Health 101685275 2059-7908 health policies and all other topics snake bite, stings and other evenoming systematic review Competing interests: SB and ZL have conducted systematic reviews for informing WHO guidelines for other diseases. 2018 02 19 2018 03 18 2018 03 24 2018 4 18 6 0 2018 4 18 6 0 2018 4 18 6 1 epublish 29662699 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000783 bmjgh-2018-000783 PMC5898301 Wilderness Environ Med. 2014 Mar;25(1):35-40 24412659 Lancet. 2007

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 BMJ global health

15. Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use. (PubMed)

Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use. The AGREE II instrument is the most commonly used guideline appraisal tool. It includes 23 appraisal criteria (items) organized within six domains. AGREE II also includes two overall assessments (overall guideline quality, recommendation for use). Our aim was to investigate how strongly the 23 AGREE II items influence the two (...) overall assessments.An online survey of authors of publications on guideline appraisals with AGREE II and guideline users from a German scientific network was conducted between 10th February 2015 and 30th March 2015. Participants were asked to rate the influence of the AGREE II items on a Likert scale (0 = no influence to 5 = very strong influence). The frequencies of responses and their dispersion were presented descriptively.Fifty-eight of the 376 persons contacted (15.4%) participated in the survey

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 BMC health services research

16. Guideline-based quality indicators-a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines: protocol for a systematic review. (PubMed)

Guideline-based quality indicators-a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines: protocol for a systematic review. Quality indicators (QIs) are used in assessing the quality of healthcare. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are relevant sources for generating QIs. In this context, QIs are important tools to assess the implementation of guideline recommendations. However, the methodological approaches to guideline-based QI development vary (...) of guideline-based QIs. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated to what extent guideline-based QIs from different CPGs that are related to the same topic are consistent. The objective of this study is to compare guideline-based QIs and their underlying methodological approaches of German S3-CPGs with those of topic-related international CPGs.Based on the previous identified German S3-CPGs (n = 35), which report quality indicators, we will conduct systematic searches in the guidelines databases of G

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 Systematic reviews

17. Guideline Assessment Project: Filling the GAP in Surgical Guidelines: Quality Improvement Initiative by an International Working Group. (PubMed)

Guideline Assessment Project: Filling the GAP in Surgical Guidelines: Quality Improvement Initiative by an International Working Group. The aim of the study was to identify clinical practice guidelines published by surgical scientific organizations, assess their quality, and investigate the association between defined factors and quality. The ultimate objective was to develop a framework to improve the quality of surgical guidelines.Evidence on the quality of surgical guidelines is lacking.We (...) searched MEDLINE for clinical practice guidelines published by surgical scientific organizations with an international scope between 2008 and 2017. We investigated the association between the following factors and guideline quality, as assessed using the AGREE II instrument: number of guidelines published within the study period by a scientific organization, the presence of a guidelines committee, applying the GRADE methodology, consensus project design, and the presence of intersociety

2018 Annals of Surgery

18. Dental implant guidelines: methodological quality needs improvement

Dental implant guidelines: methodological quality needs improvement Dental implant guidelines: methodological quality needs improvement - National Elf Service Search National Elf Service Search National Elf Service » » » » Dental implant guidelines: methodological quality needs improvement Apr 28 2017 Posted by Clinicians rely heavily on consensus guidelines when they develop treatment protocols for their patients. The idea is that the most experienced clinicians and academics meet (...) and systematically develop what they feel is best practice in their field. Health care providers and regulators then rely on this distillation of knowledge, experience and evidence in their decision making. A systematic review of guideline quality in peer-reviewed medical literature was conducted in 1999 and found only a 43% adherence to reporting standards ( Shaneyfelt et al. 1999 ). In 2003, a generic tool was created by the to create “common standards to improve the quality process and reporting of guideline

2017 The Dental Elf

19. Applying STOPP Guidelines in Primary Care Through Electronic Medical Record Decision Support: Randomized Control Trial Highlighting the Importance of Data Quality (PubMed)

Applying STOPP Guidelines in Primary Care Through Electronic Medical Record Decision Support: Randomized Control Trial Highlighting the Importance of Data Quality Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (PIPs) are a common cause of morbidity, particularly in the elderly.We sought to understand how the Screening Tool of Older People's Prescriptions (STOPP) prescribing criteria, implemented in a routinely used primary care Electronic Medical Record (EMR), could impact PIP rates in community (non (...) and by the decision support such as problem and medication lists. Users also highlighted areas for better integration of STOPP guidelines with prescribing workflows. Many of the STOPP criteria can be implemented in EMRs using simple logic. However, data quality in EMRs continues to be a challenge and was a limiting step in the effectiveness of the decision support in this study. This is important as decision makers continue to fund implementation and adoption of EMRs with the expectation of the use of advanced

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 JMIR medical informatics

20. Is there a cut-off for high-quality guidelines? A systematic analysis of current guideline appraisals using the AGREE II instrument. (PubMed)

Is there a cut-off for high-quality guidelines? A systematic analysis of current guideline appraisals using the AGREE II instrument. To investigate whether Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II users apply a cut-off based on standardized domain scores or overall guideline quality to distinguish between high- and low-quality guidelines, as well as to investigate which criteria they use to generate this cut-off and which type of cut-off they apply.We conducted a systematic (...) search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE, and the HTA-database for German- and English-language studies appraising guidelines with AGREE II. Information on cut-offs was extracted and analyzed descriptively.We identified 118 relevant publications. Thirty-nine (33%) used a cut-off, of which 24 (62%) used a 2-step and 13 (33%) used a 3-step approach. The cut-off for high quality lay between 50% and 70% (2-step) and 60% and 83% (3-step) of the highest possible rating. Twenty-four (62%) publications applied a cut

2017 Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>