How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

587 results for

Nonabsorbable Suture

by
...
Latest & greatest
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

1. Comparative analysis of nonabsorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery (PubMed)

Comparative analysis of nonabsorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery 29676311 2018 06 14 2018 12 02 1998-3689 66 5 2018 05 Indian journal of ophthalmology Indian J Ophthalmol Comparative analysis of nonabsorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery. 665 10.4103/ijo.IJO_272_18 Kochgaway Lav L B B Eye Foundation VIP, RAA 36, Raghunathpur, Kolkata, India. Bhargava Sagar S B B Eye Foundation VIP (...) , RAA 36, Raghunathpur, Kolkata, India. Singh Maneesh M B B Eye Foundation VIP, RAA 36, Raghunathpur, Kolkata, India. eng Journal Article Comment India Indian J Ophthalmol 0405376 0301-4738 0 Nylons 34346-01-5 Polyglactin 910 IM Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 May;66(5):661-664 29676310 Cataract Cataract Extraction Child Humans Nylons Polyglactin 910 Sutures There are no conflicts of interest 2018 4 21 6 0 2018 4 21 6 0 2018 6 15 6 0 ppublish 29676311 IndianJOphthalmol_2018_66_5_665_230673 10.4103

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 Indian journal of ophthalmology

2. Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy

Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov Hide glossary Glossary Study record managers: refer to the if submitting registration or results information. Search for terms x × Study Record Detail Saved Studies Save this study Warning You have reached the maximum number of saved studies (100). Please remove one or more studies before adding more. Nonabsorbable Versus (...) National University Hospital Information provided by (Responsible Party): Myung Jae Jeon, Seoul National University Hospital Study Details Study Description Go to Brief Summary: The objective of this is to compare surgical outcomes of anterior colporrhaphy using nonabsorbable sutures with anterior colporrhaphy using absorbable sutures. Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase Pelvic Organ Prolapse Device: Polyglactin 910 or polydioxanone Device: Polyester or polypropylene Not Applicable

2018 Clinical Trials

3. Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures (Re-post)

Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures (Re-post) Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures (Re-post) – PEMBlog Search for: Search for: Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures (Re-post) There are many options for wound repair. It is no secret that the face is a common location for lacerations in children. Because children, especially toddlers and preschoolers, are inclined to be scared by intimidating ED physicians many parents inquire about dissolvable sutures, so that their child will not have (...) to be held down twice (once for placement and once for removal). Therefore, the goal of this post is to review the use of absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures in children. Materials Plain gut Absorbable Tensile strength: Up to 8-9 days Natural treated product. Can also come from sheep. Fast absorbing plain gut Absorbable Tensile strength: 5-7 days Heat treated so that it dissolves faster. Great for facial lacerations in which removal will be difficult. 6-0 is very thin and breaks easily, so 5-0 could

2018 PEM Blog

4. Absorbable Suture Versus Nonabsorbable Suture Intradermal for the Skin Transverse Section in Cesarean

Absorbable Suture Versus Nonabsorbable Suture Intradermal for the Skin Transverse Section in Cesarean Absorbable Suture Versus Nonabsorbable Suture Intradermal for the Skin Transverse Section in Cesarean - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov Hide glossary Glossary Study record managers: refer to the if submitting registration or results information. Search for terms x × Study Record Detail Saved Studies Save this study Warning You have reached the maximum number of saved studies (100). Please (...) remove one or more studies before adding more. Absorbable Suture Versus Nonabsorbable Suture Intradermal for the Skin Transverse Section in Cesarean The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our for details. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02839005 Recruitment Status : Completed First Posted : July 20, 2016 Last Update Posted : July 20, 2016

2016 Clinical Trials

5. Arthroscopic Fixation of Tibial Eminence Fractures: A Clinical Comparative Study of Nonabsorbable Sutures Versus Absorbable Suture Anchors. (PubMed)

Arthroscopic Fixation of Tibial Eminence Fractures: A Clinical Comparative Study of Nonabsorbable Sutures Versus Absorbable Suture Anchors. To compare clinical outcomes of arthroscopic therapy for tibial eminence fracture with nonabsorbable suture and absorbable suture anchor.Between February 2010 and September 2012, a total of 60 tibial eminence fracture patients were treated with nonabsorbable suture fixation or absorbable suture anchor fixation under arthroscopy. Patients with tibial plateau (...) fractures and other significant injuries, including osteochondral lesions, meniscal tear, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or mutiligament injuries, were excluded from the study. Radiographs, anterior drawer test (ADT), Lachman test, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 subjective score were employed to evaluate clinical outcomes in follow-up.A total of 41 patients were analyzed. Among these patients, 22 were treated with nonabsorbable suture fixation and 19

2016 Arthroscopy

6. Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Repair Through Open Ligament Transfer and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation (PubMed)

Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Repair Through Open Ligament Transfer and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation Acromioclavicular (AC) joint instability is a fairly common and particularly limiting injury that may result in persistent pain and reduced quality of life. In most cases, conservative management is successful. However, in the case of a severe AC joint dislocation, surgical intervention may be warranted. Previous surgical techniques for treatment of AC joint instability include screw (...) fixation between the coracoid and clavicle, coracoacromial ligament transfer from its acromial insertion to the clavicle, and reconstruction of the coracoacromial and/or coracoclavicular ligaments. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our preferred technique for the treatment of a high-grade AC dislocation through coracoacromial ligament transfer to the lateral clavicle and nonabsorbable suture fixation between the coracoid process and clavicle.

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 Arthroscopy techniques

7. Functional Outcomes of Achilles Tendon Minimally Invasive Repair Using 4- and 6-Strand Nonabsorbable Suture: A Cohort Comparison Study (PubMed)

Functional Outcomes of Achilles Tendon Minimally Invasive Repair Using 4- and 6-Strand Nonabsorbable Suture: A Cohort Comparison Study The aim of management of Achilles tendon rupture is to reduce tendon lengthening and maximize function while reducing the rerupture rate and minimizing other complications.To determine changes in Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA), heel-rise height, patient-reported outcomes, return to play, and occurrence of complications after minimally invasive repair (...) of Achilles tendon ruptures using nonabsorbable sutures.Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Between March 2013 and August 2015, a total of 70 patients (58 males, 12 females) with a mean age of 42 ± 8 years were included and evaluated at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after repair of an Achilles tendon rupture. Surgical repair was performed using either 4-strand or 6-strand nonabsorbable sutures. After surgery, patients were mobilized, fully weightbearing using a functional brace. Early active movement

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine

8. Knee Squeaking Secondary to Intra-articular Nonabsorbable Suture: A Report of 2 Cases (PubMed)

Knee Squeaking Secondary to Intra-articular Nonabsorbable Suture: A Report of 2 Cases 28781976 2019 02 26 2325-9671 5 7 2017 Jul Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine Orthop J Sports Med Knee Squeaking Secondary to Intra-articular Nonabsorbable Suture: A Report of 2 Cases. 2325967117716386 10.1177/2325967117716386 Zarah Jake J Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Chaudhry Zaira S ZS Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine

9. Nonabsorbable Suture

Nonabsorbable Suture Nonabsorbable Suture Toggle navigation Brain Head & Neck Chest Endocrine Abdomen Musculoskeletal Skin Infectious Disease Hematology & Oncology Cohorts Diagnostics Emergency Findings Procedures Prevention & Management Pharmacy Resuscitation Trauma Emergency Procedures Ultrasound Cardiovascular Emergencies Lung Emergencies Infectious Disease Pediatrics Neurologic Emergencies Skin Exposure Miscellaneous Abuse Cancer Administration 4 Nonabsorbable Suture Nonabsorbable Suture (...) Aka: Nonabsorbable Suture II. Nonabsorbable Sutures ( , ) ( , Surgilene) ( , , ) ( ) III. References Epperson in Pfenninger and Fowler (1994) Procedures for Primary Care Physicians, Mosby, Chicago, p. 3-11 Townsend (2001) Sabiston Textbook Surgery, p. 1552-3 Images: Related links to external sites (from Bing) These images are a random sampling from a Bing search on the term "Nonabsorbable Suture." Click on the image (or right click) to open the source website in a new browser window. Related

2018 FP Notebook

10. Nonabsorbable versus absorbable sutures in large, hang-back medial rectus muscle recessions. (PubMed)

Nonabsorbable versus absorbable sutures in large, hang-back medial rectus muscle recessions. To investigate the value of nonabsorbable sutures in reducing the incidence of consecutive exotropia after large, "hang-back" medial rectus recessions.The medical records of patients who underwent medial rectus recession of ≥6.5 mm in individuals ≤2 years of age, or ≥7.0 mm in those >2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on suture material used: absorbable (...) , polyglactin 910 sutures (44 patients); nonabsorbable, polyester sutures (50 patients). Preoperative measurements, ductions, strabismus surgery, and postoperative results were analyzed. Inadequate anchoring of the medial rectus muscle was suspected when consecutive exotropia developed 4-7 weeks after surgery after initial satisfactory alignment and was confirmed if during reoperation the medial rectus muscle appeared recessed >2 mm beyond the originally intended recession.Consecutive exotropia due

2016 JAAPOS - Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus

11. Antibacterial-coated sutures versus non-antibacterial-coated sutures for the prevention of abdominal, superficial and deep, surgical site infection (SSI)

Antibacterial-coated sutures versus non-antibacterial-coated sutures for the prevention of abdominal, superficial and deep, surgical site infection (SSI) Dec2015 © EUnetHTA, 2015. Reproduction is authorised provided EUnetHTA is explicitly acknowledged 1 EUnetHTA Joint Action 3 WP4 Version 1.4, 13 March 2017 Rapid assessment of other technologies using the HTA Core Model ® for Rapid Relative Effectiveness Assessment ANTIBACTERIAL-COATED SUTURES VERSUS NON-ANTIBACTERIAL- COATED SUTURES (...) FOR THE PREVENTION OF ABDOMINAL, SUPERFICIAL AND DEEP INCISIONAL, SURGICAL SITE INFECTION (SSI) Project ID: OTCA02 Antibacterial-coated sutures for the prevention of abdominal SSI Version 1.4, March 2017 EUnetHTA Joint Action 3 WP4 2 DOCUMENT HISTORY AND CONTRIBUTORS Version Date Description V1.0 07/11/2016 First draft. V1.1 28/11/2016 Input from co-author has been processed. V1.2 23/12/2016 Input from dedicated reviewers has been processed. V1.3 20/02/2017 Input from external experts and manufacturer(s) has

2017 EUnetHTA

12. Evaluation of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures for Repair of Achilles Tendon Rupture With a Suture-Guiding Device. (PubMed)

Evaluation of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures for Repair of Achilles Tendon Rupture With a Suture-Guiding Device. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional and clinical results of Achilles tendon repairs with an Achilles tendon suture-guiding device using nonabsorbable versus absorbable sutures. We hypothesized that the absorbable suture would have clinical results comparable to those of the nonabsorbable suture for Achilles tendon repair with an Achilles tendon suture (...) -guiding system.From January 2010 to September 2013, 48 consecutive patients who had sustained a spontaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon underwent operative repair with an Achilles tendon suture-guiding device using 2 different suture types. All ruptures were acute. The patients were divided equally into 2 groups according to suture type. In the nonabsorbable suture group, No. 2 braided nonabsorbable polyethylene terephthalate sutures were used, and in the absorbable suture group, braided absorbable

2015 Foot & Ankle International

13. Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures for Skin Closure: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. (PubMed)

Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures for Skin Closure: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Prior studies focused on skin closure using absorbable or nonabsorbable sutures involved small samples and produced conflicting results. The optimal method of skin closure still remains unclear.This study aimed to compare the outcomes of absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures for skin closure.A meta-analysis was performed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared outcomes (...) of absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures for skin closure.A total of 1748 patients in 19 RCTs were analyzed. There was no significant difference between absorbable sutures and nonabsorbable sutures in the incidence of wound infections, cosmetic outcomes, scar formation, wound dehiscence, and patients' or patient caregivers' satisfaction. Better cosmetic results were achieved by using intradermal absorbable sutures compared with nonabsorbable sutures in subgroup analysis, but this result might be affected

2015 Annals of plastic surgery

14. Influence of Sutures on Cartilage Integrity: Do Meniscus Sutures Harm Cartilage? An Experimental Animal Study. (PubMed)

Influence of Sutures on Cartilage Integrity: Do Meniscus Sutures Harm Cartilage? An Experimental Animal Study. To evaluate whether different suture materials in meniscal repair may harm cartilage.A preloaded linear friction testing setup including porcine knees with porcine cartilage, porcine meniscus, and different suture materials (braided nonabsorbable, absorbable monofilament) was used. Five groups with different tribological pairs were tested: cartilage on meniscus (control), cartilage (...) and transitional zones with braided nonabsorbable (P = .03) and absorbable monofilament (P = .02) sutures at final examination. Menisci sutured with braided nonabsorbable material resulted in deeper damage to the cartilage. However, there were no significant differences between the suture materials. Sutures oriented perpendicular to surface motion led to a larger defect than parallel-oriented sutures.Braided nonabsorbable and absorbable monofilament suture materials cause significant damage to cartilage during

2019 Arthroscopy

15. A Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Lacerations on the Extremities and Trunk Using Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures. (PubMed)

A Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Lacerations on the Extremities and Trunk Using Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures. The primary objective was to compare the cosmetic outcomes of traumatic trunk and extremity lacerations repaired using absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures. The secondary objective was to compare complication rates between the two groups.This was a randomized controlled trial comparing wounds repaired with Vicryl Rapide and Prolene sutures. Pediatric and adult patients (...) and extremities should be considered as an alternative to nonabsorbable suture repair.© 2014 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2014 Academic Emergency Medicine

16. Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia With Sutures Versus Absorbable Mesh Versus Nonabsorbable Mesh: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (PubMed)

Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia With Sutures Versus Absorbable Mesh Versus Nonabsorbable Mesh: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Determine whether absorbable or nonabsorbable mesh in repair of large hiatus hernias reduces the risk of recurrence, compared with suture repair.Repair of large hiatus hernia is associated with radiological recurrence rates of up to 30%, and to improve outcomes mesh repair has been recommended. Previous trials have shown less short-term recurrence (...) with mesh, but adverse outcomes limit mesh use.Multicentre prospective double blind randomized controlled trial of 3 methods of repair: sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh. Primary outcome-hernia recurrence assessed by barium meal radiology and endoscopy at 6 months. Secondary outcomes-clinical symptom scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.A total of 126 patients enrolled: 43 sutures, 41 absorbable mesh, and 42 nonabsorbable mesh. Among them, 96.0% were followed up to 12 months

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2014 Annals of surgery

17. Continuous Absorbable Intradermal Sutures Yield Better Cosmetic Results than Nonabsorbable Interrupted Sutures in Open Appendectomy Wounds: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. (PubMed)

Continuous Absorbable Intradermal Sutures Yield Better Cosmetic Results than Nonabsorbable Interrupted Sutures in Open Appendectomy Wounds: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Acute appendicitis is the most common reason for abdominal surgery in young adults and children. Open appendectomy is still the treatment often chosen because it is simple, safe, and effective. Our aim was to study whether cosmetic results of appendectomy wounds are better after using continuous absorbable intradermal (...) (A) sutures compared with wound closure with interrupted nonabsorbable (NA) sutures.A total of 206 adult patients with clinically suspected appendicitis were allocated to the study and prospectively randomized into two wound-closure groups: the interrupted NA suture group and the A suture group. Of these, 193 patients with sufficient data were invited to the outpatient clinic for cosmetic analysis. Cosmetic results were evaluated after a median of 14 months. For subjective scar assessment, the Vancouver

2013 World Journal of Surgery

18. Comparative analysis of non-absorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery (PubMed)

by vascularization (14.1%), infiltration (1.5%), and opacification (4.4%).Absorbable suture such as 10-0 Vicryl is preferred over nonabsorbable suture 10-0 nylon for suturing incisions in pediatric cataract surgery, to avoid subjecting the child to repeated anesthesia. (...) Comparative analysis of non-absorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery The purpose of the study is to compare the efficiency as well as the rate and type of suture-related complications between 10-0 monofilament nylon (Aurolab Nylon Sutures, double arm, Aurolab) and 10-0 polyglactin 910 sutures (Vicryl, single arm, Aurolab) for pediatric cataract surgery.It is a prospective, comparative study performed in children who underwent surgery

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 Indian journal of ophthalmology

19. Outcome of a Modified Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse with the Use of a Single or Double Suture: A Case Series of 15 Patients (PubMed)

fixation of the rectum was marked. The seromuscular layer of the anterior right wall was then sutured to the presacral fascia using only one or two interrupted nonabsorbable polypropylene sutures. The mean operative time was 176.2±35.2 minutes, with minimal blood loss. No moderate or severe postoperative complications were observed, and there was no postoperative mortality. One patient (6.7%) developed recurrence of rectal prolapse one month following surgery. CONCLUSIONS The advantages of this LSR (...) Outcome of a Modified Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse with the Use of a Single or Double Suture: A Case Series of 15 Patients BACKGROUND Surgery is considered to be a mainstay of therapy for full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP). Surgical procedures for FTRP have been described, but optimal treatment is still controversial. The aim of this report is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a simplified laparoscopic suture rectopexy (LSR) in a case series of 15 patients who

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 The American journal of case reports

20. Is nonabsorbable nasal packing after septoplasty essential? A meta-analysis. (PubMed)

systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Random effect models were used to calculate risk differences and risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Cases referred to the nonpacking group included patients treated with transseptal sutures or septal splints. Cases referred to as the packing group included patients treated with nonabsorbable packing such as Merocel or gauze.Our search included 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs (...) Is nonabsorbable nasal packing after septoplasty essential? A meta-analysis. Septoplasty is one of the most frequently performed rhinologic surgeries. Complications include nasal bleeding, pain, headache, septal hematoma, synechia, infection, residual septal deviation, and septal perforation. In this study, we aimed to compare complication rates among patients according to packing method.We performed a literature search using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through August 2016. Our

2016 The Laryngoscope

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>