How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

3,254 results for

Electronic Mail

by
...
Latest & greatest
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

1. Is it too early to move to full electronic PROM data collection?: A randomized controlled trial comparing PROM's after hallux valgus captured by e-mail, traditional mail and telephone. (PubMed)

Is it too early to move to full electronic PROM data collection?: A randomized controlled trial comparing PROM's after hallux valgus captured by e-mail, traditional mail and telephone. Patient reported outcome measures (PROM's) after hallux valgus surgery are used to rate the effectiveness as perceived by the patient. The interpretability of these PROM's is highly dependent on participation rate. Data capture method may be an important factor contributing to the response rate. We investigated (...) . The response rate on traditional mail was highest (88%), while response on e-mail was lowest (33%). Response rate on telephone was also high (79%). Response rate on traditional mail and telephone was significantly higher (p<0.001) than response on e-mail.Though electronic data collection has enormous potential, this study shows that e-mail yields unacceptable low response rates. It is too early to replace traditional pen-and-paper PROM's by electronic questionnaires.Copyright © 2015 European Foot and Ankle

2016 Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons

2. Electronic Mail

Electronic Mail Electronic Mail Toggle navigation Brain Head & Neck Chest Endocrine Abdomen Musculoskeletal Skin Infectious Disease Hematology & Oncology Cohorts Diagnostics Emergency Findings Procedures Prevention & Management Pharmacy Resuscitation Trauma Emergency Procedures Ultrasound Cardiovascular Emergencies Lung Emergencies Infectious Disease Pediatrics Neurologic Emergencies Skin Exposure Miscellaneous Abuse Cancer Administration 4 Electronic Mail Electronic Mail Aka: Electronic Mail (...) on the term "Electronic Mail." Click on the image (or right click) to open the source website in a new browser window. Related Studies (from Trip Database) Ontology: Email (C0013849) Definition (NCI) E-mail is short for "electronic mail" and refers to composing, sending, and receiving messages over electronic communication systems. Most e-mail systems use the Internet. Definition (MSH) Messages between computer users via COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS. This feature duplicates most of the features

2018 FP Notebook

3. Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Approximately 24 million US individuals receive care at federally qualified health centers, which historically have low rates of colorectal cancer screening. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends routine colorectal cancer screening for individuals aged 50 to 75 years.To determine the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR (...) )-embedded mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program implemented in health centers as part of standard care.This cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial was conducted in 26 federally qualified health center clinics, representing 8 health centers in Oregon and California, randomized to intervention (n = 13) or usual care (n = 13). All participants were overdue for colorectal cancer screening during the accrual interval (February 4, 2014 to February 3, 2015).Electronic health record

2018 EvidenceUpdates

4. Electronic Health Record-Based Patient Identification and Individualized Mailed Outreach for Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Cluster Randomized Trial (PubMed)

Electronic Health Record-Based Patient Identification and Individualized Mailed Outreach for Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Cluster Randomized Trial Many individuals at higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) do not receive recommended treatments. Prior interventions using personalized risk information to promote prevention did not test clinic-wide effectiveness.To perform a 9-month cluster-randomized trial, comparing a strategy of electronic health record-based (...) identification of patients with increased CVD risk and individualized mailed outreach to usual care.Patients of participating physicians with a Framingham Risk Score of at least 5 %, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol level above guideline threshold for drug treatment, and not prescribed a lipid-lowering medication were included in the intention-to-treat analysis.Patients of physicians randomized to the intervention group were mailed individualized CVD risk messages that described benefits of using

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2013 EvidenceUpdates

5. STOP HCC: Mailed HCV Treatment Outreach Program for HCC Prevention

STOP HCC: Mailed HCV Treatment Outreach Program for HCC Prevention STOP HCC: Mailed HCV Treatment Outreach Program for HCC Prevention - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov Hide glossary Glossary Study record managers: refer to the if submitting registration or results information. Search for terms x × Study Record Detail Saved Studies Save this study Warning You have reached the maximum number of saved studies (100). Please remove one or more studies before adding more. STOP HCC: Mailed HCV (...) : University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Information provided by (Responsible Party): Amit Singal, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Study Details Study Description Go to Brief Summary: Aim 1: The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing two strategies to promote HCV screening, follow-up testing, and treatment among baby-boomers (i.e. persons born between 1945-1965): inreach with electronic medical record alerts and provider education vs. combination

2018 Clinical Trials

6. Geographically Clustered Mailing of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Kits

kit is mailed for each patient by any recommended screening modality (FIT, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy; i.e., the proportion of treated vs. usual care patients who have completed screening). Screening will be measured using electronic medical record procedure, result, and billing data (Parkland-specific, CPT, ICD9/10 codes) and will be considered complete when satisfactory (e.g., adequate sample collection) FIT or colonoscopy test results are received. Secondary Outcome Measures : Neighborhood (...) completion of mailings. ] Defined as any recommended screening modality. Screening will be measured using electronic medical record procedure, result, and billing data and will be considered complete when satisfactory FIT or colonoscopy test results are received. Neighborhood-level Screening [ Time Frame: Assessed 2 and 3 years after completion of mailings. ] Defined for each neighborhood as the number of all screening-eligible patients who are up-to-date with screening guidelines divided by the total

2018 Clinical Trials

7. Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. (PubMed)

Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. Approximately 24 million US individuals receive care at federally qualified health centers, which historically have low rates of colorectal cancer screening. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends routine colorectal cancer screening for individuals aged 50 to 75 years.To determine the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR (...) )-embedded mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program implemented in health centers as part of standard care.This cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial was conducted in 26 federally qualified health center clinics, representing 8 health centers in Oregon and California, randomized to intervention (n = 13) or usual care (n = 13). All participants were overdue for colorectal cancer screening during the accrual interval (February 4, 2014 to February 3, 2015).Electronic health record

2018 JAMA Internal Medicine

8. Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. (PubMed)

Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. Approximately 24 million US individuals receive care at federally qualified health centers, which historically have low rates of colorectal cancer screening. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends routine colorectal cancer screening for individuals aged 50 to 75 years.To determine the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR (...) )-embedded mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program implemented in health centers as part of standard care.This cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial was conducted in 26 federally qualified health center clinics, representing 8 health centers in Oregon and California, randomized to intervention (n = 13) or usual care (n = 13). All participants were overdue for colorectal cancer screening during the accrual interval (February 4, 2014 to February 3, 2015).Electronic health record

2018 JAMA Internal Medicine

9. Electronic mail communication between physicians and patients: a review of challenges and opportunities. (PubMed)

Electronic mail communication between physicians and patients: a review of challenges and opportunities. Although promising benefits hold for email communication between physicians and patients in terms of lowering the costs of health care while maintaining or improving the quality of disease management and health promotion, physician use of email with patients is still low and lags behind the willingness of patients to communicate with their physicians through email. There is also (...) are reluctant to do so because of perceived barriers. This report is a review of the literature on the readiness for and adoption of physician-patient email communication, and how can challenges be or have been addressed. The need for Governmental support and directives for email communication to move forward is iterated, and opportunities for future research are pointed out. © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2015 Family Practice

10. E-Mailed Conference Synopses as a Tool for Resident and Faculty Development. (PubMed)

E-Mailed Conference Synopses as a Tool for Resident and Faculty Development. This study aims to investigate the utility and success of daily conference synopses emails ("Daily Dispatches") sent to surgical attending physicians, fellows, and residents to foster resident and faculty development.Emails were distributed by the surgical residency program director (PD), summarizing each day of a surgical conference. Two prospective electronic surveys were administered to surgical residents, fellows

2017 Journal of Surgical Education

11. Reasons for never and intermittent completion of colorectal cancer screening after receiving multiple rounds of mailed fecal tests. (PubMed)

mentioned by participants who screened at least once including: (1) Use of a simpler 1-sample fecal test; (2) Convenience of mailings and doing the test at home; (3) Salience of prevention, especially as one got older; and (4) Influence of recommendations from providers, family and friends. Participants had diverse preferences for the number (3 on average) and types (phone, mail, text) of screening reminders. Some participants did not prefer e-mail links to the patient shared electronic health record (...) Reasons for never and intermittent completion of colorectal cancer screening after receiving multiple rounds of mailed fecal tests. Long-term adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is particularly important for fecal testing. Some U.S. studies report that only 25% of individuals repeat fecal testing annually. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify barriers and facilitators reported by patients with suboptimal screening adherence to refine interventions for starting

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 BMC Public Health

12. UPTAKE OF THE USE OF PATIENT-DOCTOR E-MAIL IN AN ENDOCRINOLOGY OUTPATIENT SETTING (PubMed)

Ulster Med J 0417367 0041-6193 IM Ulster Med J. 2017 Sep;86(3):201-202 29581637 Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Ambulatory Care Facilities Communication Electronic Mail statistics & numerical data Endocrinology Female Humans Male Middle Aged Young Adult 2017 3 17 6 0 2017 3 17 6 0 2019 1 5 6 0 ppublish 28298713 PMC5324180 J Med Internet Res. 2011 Feb 25;13(1):e23 21447468 Am J Manag Care. 2002 May;8(5):427-33 12019595 J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 06;17(3):e58 25798912 J Med Internet Res. 2014 (...) UPTAKE OF THE USE OF PATIENT-DOCTOR E-MAIL IN AN ENDOCRINOLOGY OUTPATIENT SETTING 28298713 2019 01 04 2019 01 04 2046-4207 86 1 2017 01 The Ulster medical journal Ulster Med J UPTAKE OF THE USE OF PATIENT-DOCTOR E-MAIL IN AN ENDOCRINOLOGY OUTPATIENT SETTING. 42 Todd Anna A Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK. Johnston Philip C PC Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK. eng Letter Northern Ireland

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 The Ulster medical journal

13. MRI and Radiation Exposure in Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices

MRI and Radiation Exposure in Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging and radiation exposure in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices - Heart Rhythm Email/Username: Password: Remember me Search both HRS Journals Search Terms Search within Search Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages e97–e153 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging and radiation exposure in patients (...) with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices x Julia H. Indik Affiliations University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center, Tucson, AZ , MD, PhD, FHRS, FACC, FAHA (Chair) 1 , x J. Rod Gimbel Affiliations Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH , MD (Vice-Chair) 2 , x Haruhiko Abe Affiliations Department of Heart Rhythm Management, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan , MD 3 , ∗ , x Ricardo Alkmim-Teixeira Affiliations Heart Institute-InCor, São Paulo University Medical

2017 American Society for Radiation Oncology

14. 2017 AHA/ACC Key Data Elements and Definitions for Ambulatory Electronic Health Records in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards

2017 AHA/ACC Key Data Elements and Definitions for Ambulatory Electronic Health Records in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards 2017 AHA/ACC Key Data Elements and Definitions for Ambulatory Electronic Health Records in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards | Circulation (...) : Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Search Hello Guest! Login to your account Email Password Keep me logged in Search April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Free Access article Share on Jump to Free Access article 2017 AHA/ACC Key Data Elements and Definitions for Ambulatory Electronic Health Records in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart

2017 American Heart Association

15. Expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiation exposure in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

Expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiation exposure in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging and radiation exposure in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices - Heart Rhythm Email/Username: Password: Remember me Search both HRS Journals Search Terms Search within Search Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages e97–e153 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance (...) imaging and radiation exposure in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices x Julia H. Indik Affiliations University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center, Tucson, AZ , MD, PhD, FHRS, FACC, FAHA (Chair) 1 , x J. Rod Gimbel Affiliations Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH , MD (Vice-Chair) 2 , x Haruhiko Abe Affiliations Department of Heart Rhythm Management, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan , MD 3 , ∗ , x Ricardo Alkmim-Teixeira Affiliations

2017 American Society for Radiation Oncology

16. Merging Electronic Health Record Data and Genomics for Cardiovascular Research

Merging Electronic Health Record Data and Genomics for Cardiovascular Research Merging Electronic Health Record Data and Genomics for Cardiovascular Research | Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics Search Hello Guest! Login to your account Email Password Keep me logged in Search February 2019 January 2019 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Free Access article Share on Jump to Free Access article Merging Electronic Health Record Data (...) and Prevention, Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research, and Stroke Council Originally published 14 Mar 2016 Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics. 2016;9:193–202 You are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: Abstract The process of scientific discovery is rapidly evolving. The funding climate has influenced a favorable shift in scientific discovery toward the use of existing resources such as the electronic health record. The electronic health record enables long-term

2016 American Heart Association

17. Implementation of Electronic Dental Records? Effects on Cost Savings for a Private Dental Practitioner are Unclear Due to Lack of Research

than the use of paper records. Thus, more research in the dental community is needed to determine the outcome. Specialty/Discipline (General Dentistry) Keywords Electronic health records, paper records, cost-benefit analysis ID# 3086 Date of submission: 04/11/2016 E-mail saldivaraa@livemail.uthscsa.edu Author Abiel A. Saldivar Co-author(s) Co-author(s) e-mail Faculty mentor/Co-author Jeffery L. Hicks, DDS & John D. Rugh, PhD Faculty mentor/Co-author e-mail HicksJ@uthscsa.edu; Rugh@uthscsa.edu Basic (...) Implementation of Electronic Dental Records? Effects on Cost Savings for a Private Dental Practitioner are Unclear Due to Lack of Research UTCAT3086, Found CAT view, CRITICALLY APPRAISED TOPICs University: | | ORAL HEALTH EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE PROGRAM View the CAT / Title Implementation of Electronic Dental Records’ Effects on Cost Savings for a Private Dental Practitioner are Unclear Due to Lack of Research Clinical Question For a private dental practitioner, are electronic records more cost

2016 UTHSCSA Dental School CAT Library

18. Telephone vs. Web-based prescreening predicts early but not overall physician response to a mailed survey (PubMed)

Telephone vs. Web-based prescreening predicts early but not overall physician response to a mailed survey 27498375 2018 08 22 2018 11 13 1878-5921 80 2016 12 Journal of clinical epidemiology J Clin Epidemiol Telephone vs. Web-based prescreening predicts early but not overall physician response to a mailed survey. 134-135 S0895-4356(16)30273-6 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.015 Bonuedie Hillary H Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics SUMR Program, 3641 Locust Walk # 210, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (...) School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 12-30 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: ryskina@mail.med.upenn.edu. eng K08 AG052572 AG NIA NIH HHS United States Letter Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural 2016 08 03 United States J Clin Epidemiol 8801383 0895-4356 IM Attitude of Health Personnel Data Collection methods statistics & numerical data Humans Internet Physicians psychology statistics & numerical data Postal Service Surveys

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2016 Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

19. Using direct mail to promote organ donor registration: Two campaigns and a meta-analysis. (PubMed)

Using direct mail to promote organ donor registration: Two campaigns and a meta-analysis. Two direct mail campaigns were undertaken in Rochester and Buffalo, New York, with the goal of enrolling adults aged 50-64 years into the state organ and tissue donation electronic registry. Meta-analytic methods were used to summarize the body of research on the effects of direct mail marketing to promote organ donation registration.In the first study, 40 000 mailers were sent to targeted adults (...) in Rochester, New York, and varied by brochure-only, letter-only, and letter plus brochure mailing conditions. A follow-up mailer using letter-only was sent to 20 000 individuals in Buffalo, New York area. In a second study, campaign results were combined with previously published direct mail campaigns in a random-effects meta-analysis.The overall registration rates were 1.6% and 4.6% for the Rochester and Buffalo campaigns, and the letter-only condition outperformed the brochure-only and letter plus

2016 Clinical transplantation

20. Measuring the patient experience in primary care: Comparing e-mail and waiting room survey delivery in a family health team (PubMed)

Measuring the patient experience in primary care: Comparing e-mail and waiting room survey delivery in a family health team To compare the characteristics and responses of patients completing a patient experience survey accessed online after e-mail notification or delivered in the waiting room using tablet computers.Cross-sectional comparison of 2 methods of delivering a patient experience survey.A large family health team in Toronto, Ont.Family practice patients aged 18 or older who completed (...) an e-mail survey between January and June 2014 (N = 587) or who completed the survey in the waiting room in July and August 2014 (N = 592).Comparison of respondent demographic characteristics and responses to questions related to access and patient-centredness.Patients responding to the e-mail survey were more likely to live in higher-income neighbourhoods (P = .0002), be between the ages of 35 and 64 (P = .0147), and be female (P = .0434) compared with those responding to the waiting room survey

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2016 Canadian Family Physician

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>