How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

9,188 results for

E/M Medical Decision Making

by
...
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

21. End of Life Decision Making

be made to understand and respect the cultural mores of the patient and her family. Cultural issues may include with whom one communicates within the family, whom the patient looks to for advice and decision making, how the patient feels about the use of pain medications, and how suffering is understood ( ). When a patient lacks the capacity to make health care decisions, the health care provider may be faced with conflicts between surrogate decision makers and cultural expectations. For example (...) Care Planning Since 1991, Medicaid-participating and Medicare-participating health care institutions have been required to inform all adult patients of their rights to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to formulate an advance directive. The obstetrician–gynecologist is in an ideal position to have ongoing discussions with healthy patients about their values and wishes regarding future care and to encourage them to complete an advance directive for health care by describing

2015 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

22. AUA White Paper on Implementation of Shared Decision Making into Urological Practice

Foundation Website. 2013. http://www.health.org.uk/public/cms/75/76/313/4174/Implementing%20shared%20decision%20making.pdf. 2-3-2015 Wennberg, J. E. Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres . BMJ . 2002; 325 : 961 O'Connor, A. M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A., and Flood, A. B. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids . Health Aff (Millwood) . 2004; Suppl Variation : VAR63 Stacey, D., Legare, F., Col, N (...) . F. et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions . Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2014 1 : CD001431 Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001 Makoul, G. and Clayman, M. L. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters . Patient Educ Couns . 2006; 60 : 301 Charles, C., Gafni, A., and Whelan, T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter

2015 American Urological Association

23. Shared Decision-Making for Mental Health

decision making in an outpatient psychiatric medication clinic. Psychiatr Serv. 59(6):603-5. 38. Andrews, SB, et al. (2010) Developing web-based online support tools: The dartmouth decision support software. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 34(1):37- 41. 39. Alegria, M, et al. (2008) Evaluation of a patient activation and empowerment intervention in mental health care. Med Care. 46(3):247-56. 40. Cortes, DE, et al. (2009) Patient--provider communication: Understanding the role of patient activation for latinos (...) ) Critical issues for psychiatric medication shared decision making with youth and families. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services. 92(3):310-6. 51. Elwyn, G, et al. (2000) Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: The competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 50(460):892-9. 52. Simmons, M, et al. (2010) Shared decision- making: Bene?ts, barriers and current opportunities for application. Australas Psychiatry. 18(5):394-7

2015 Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health

24. “What matters most to you?” How decision aids help patients make better choices

and that research is needed on interventions that support shared decision-making between women considering mode of birth in a pregnancy after a caesarean birth and their care providers. (1) Horey D, Kealy M, Davey MA, Small R, Crowther CA. Interventions for supporting pregnant women’s decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD010041. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2. (2) Elwyn G, Frosch D, Volandes A, Edwards A, Montori V (...) . Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. Medical Decision Making 2010;30:701-11. Dell Horey / February 12, 2014 Thanks very much for taking the time to write about your review here – it’s really interesting. It would be great to hear from anyone who has used one themselves, either as a health practitioner or as a patient faced with a choice. I hope we see more high quality research in this area

2014 Evidently Cochrane

25. Making Immunization Decisions for School-aged Children: A Rapid Review

studies (two [-] and one [++] found that a range of perceived risks of immunization may influence some parental decisions to delay or avoid immunizations for their children. ? 1 study [-] found concerns around fear of vaccines being contraindicated for existing medical conditions 48 ? 3 studies ([-], [+], [++]) found concerns about combined antigens putting too much stress on a baby's immune system ? 4 studies (three [-], one [+]) found that when parents are making the decision to immunize (...) Making Immunization Decisions for School-aged Children: A Rapid Review 2 Making immunization decisions for school-aged children: A Rapid Review Anita Tsang-Sit, Analyst, Research and Policy Paulette Whyte, Supervisor Loretta Rowan, Manager August 25, 2014 i Table of Contents Key Messages 2 Executive Summary 3 1 Issue 6 2 Context 7 3 Conceptual Framework 9 4 Literature Review Question 10 5 Literature Search 10 6 Relevance Assessment 11 7 Results of the Search 12 8 Critical Appraisal 12 9

2014 Peel Health Library

26. How Returning Aggregate Research Results Impacts Interest in Research Engagement and Planned Actions Relevant to Health Care Decision Making: Cohort Study. (PubMed)

a "virtuous cycle" of research engagement, especially where ARRs are experienced favorably and affect plans to share and discuss ARRs in support of a child's chronic disease care and treatment. Reactions to ARRs vary with education level, underscoring the need for attention to equity for this model.©Elissa R Weitzman, Kara M Magane, Lauren E Wisk. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.12.2018. (...) How Returning Aggregate Research Results Impacts Interest in Research Engagement and Planned Actions Relevant to Health Care Decision Making: Cohort Study. Collection of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROs) may augment clinical data and inform health research, improving care, yet approaches to sustaining interest among patient cohorts in research participation are needed. One approach may involve returning aggregate research results (ARRs), which may help patients contextualize personal

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 Journal of medical Internet research

27. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published in the March 2015 issue of Genetics in M

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published in the March 2015 issue of Genetics in M Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology | Genetics in Medicine Thank you (...) for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2015 Association for Molecular Pathology

28. Clinical Decision-Making and Best Practices for Potential Organ and Tissue Donors: Guidelines

Management to Optimize Donor Organ Potential. CMAJ [Internet]. 2006 Mar 14 [cited 2012 Apr 5];174(6):S13-S32. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1402396 PubMed: PM16534070 PREPARED BY: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Tel: 1-866-898-8439 www.cadth.ca Clinical Decision-Making and Best Practices for Potential Organ and Tissue Donors 3 APPENDIX – FURTHER INFORMATION: Practice Guidelines and Recommendations 6. Kucewicz E, Wojarski J, Zeglen S, Saucha W (...) ://www.organsandtissues.ca/s/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Donor- Clinical Decision-Making and Best Practices for Potential Organ and Tissue Donors 4 Organ-Mgmt-Lit-Review.pdf Prepared for the forum: Medical management to optimize donor organ potential. February 23-25, 2004. 15. Van Raemdonck DE, Rega FR, Neyrinck AP, Jannis N, Verleden GM, Lerut TE. Non- heart-beating donors. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;16(4):309-21. PubMed: PM15635535 Additional References 16. Browne A. The ethics of organ donation after

2012 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Rapid Review

29. Health Information Systems Supporting Health and Resiliency Through Improved Decision-making (PubMed)

Health Information Systems Supporting Health and Resiliency Through Improved Decision-making 28144677 2018 03 01 2018 12 02 2511-705X 56 Open 2017 02 01 Methods of information in medicine Methods Inf Med Health Information Systems Supporting Health and Resiliency Through Improved Decision-making. e11-e12 10.3414/ME16-25-0001 Ring David D Tierney William M WM William M. Tierney, MD, Professor and Chair, Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, 1912 (...) Speedway, Suite 562, Austin, Texas 78712, USA, E-mail: tierney@utexas.edu. eng Editorial Comment 2017 02 01 Germany Methods Inf Med 0210453 0026-1270 IM Methods Inf Med. 2017 Feb 01;56(Open):e13-e19 28144682 Clinical Decision-Making methods Decision Support Systems, Clinical trends Electronic Health Records trends Forecasting Health Information Systems trends Precision Medicine trends 2017 2 2 6 0 2017 2 2 6 0 2018 3 2 6 0 epublish 28144677 16-25-0001 10.3414/ME16-25-0001 PMC5388924 J Am Med Inform

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 Methods of information in medicine

30. Choosing Wisely Canada recommendation - Don’t routinely do screening mammography for average risk women aged 40 – 49. Individual assessment of each woman’s preferences and risk should guide the discussion and decision regarding mammography screening in th

: 22450938. Canadian Association of Radiologists. 2012 CAR diagnostic imaging referral guidelines. Section E: cardiovascular [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2017 May 9]. Canadian Association of Radiologists. Medical imaging primer with a focus on x-ray usage and safety [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 May 9]. Tigges S, et al. Routine chest radiography in a primary care setting. Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):575-8. PMID: 15516621. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Screening for coronary heart disease (...) Choosing Wisely Canada recommendation - Don’t routinely do screening mammography for average risk women aged 40 – 49. Individual assessment of each woman’s preferences and risk should guide the discussion and decision regarding mammography screening in th Don’t do imaging for lower-back pain unless red flags are present. Red flags include, but are not limited to, severe or progressive neurological deficits or when serious underlying conditions such as osteomyelitis are suspected. Imaging

2019 CPG Infobase

31. E/M Emergency Services

E/M Emergency Services E/M Emergency Services Toggle navigation Brain Head & Neck Chest Endocrine Abdomen Musculoskeletal Skin Infectious Disease Hematology & Oncology Cohorts Diagnostics Emergency Findings Procedures Prevention & Management Pharmacy Resuscitation Trauma Emergency Procedures Ultrasound Cardiovascular Emergencies Lung Emergencies Infectious Disease Pediatrics Neurologic Emergencies Skin Exposure Miscellaneous Abuse Cancer Administration 4 E/M Emergency Services E/M Emergency (...) Services Aka: E/M Emergency Services , E/M Emergency , CPT 99281 , CPT 99282 , CPT 99283 , CPT 99284 , CPT 99285 II. Indication Emergency Department Services III. Approach Know your intended level of service from the start and document to meet that level of service HPI Code 99281 - 99283: Requires 1 of 8 component Code 99284 - 99285: Requires 4 of 8 components ROS Code 99281: Requires 0 component Code 99282 - 99283: Requires 1 component Code 99284: Requires 2 components Code 99285: Requires 10

2018 FP Notebook

32. Decision Making in Advanced Heart Failure

Decision Making in Advanced Heart Failure AHA Scientific Statement Decision Making in Advanced Heart Failure A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Endorsed by Heart Failure Society of America, American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, and Society for Medical Decision Making Larry A. Allen, MD, MHS, Co-Chair; Lynne W. Stevenson, MD, Co-Chair; Kathleen L. Grady, PhD, APN, FAHA, Co-Chair; Nathan E. Goldstein, MD; Daniel D. Matlock, MD, MPH; Robert M. Arnold, MD; Nancy R (...) hared decision making for advanced heart failure has become both more challenging and more crucial as duration of disease and treatment options have increased. High-quality decisions are chosen from medically reasonable optionsandarealignedwithvalues,goals,andpreferencesof aninformedpatient.Thetop10thingstoknowaboutdecision making in advanced heart failure care are listed in Table 1. Why Shared Decision Making? Providers have an ethical and legal mandate to involve patients in medical decisions

2012 American Heart Association

33. Options for national testing and surveillance for hepatitis E virus in the EU/EEA

1. Kamar N, Izopet J, Pavio N, Aggarwal R, Labrique A, Wedemeyer H, et al. Hepatitis E virus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Nov 16;3:17086. 2. Stanaway JD, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C, Vos T, Abubakar I, et al. The global burden of viral hepatitis from 1990 to 2013: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1081-1088. 3. European Commission. Commission implementing Decision (EU) 2018/945 of 22 June 2018 on the communicable diseases (...) with the proposal to include the monitoring of chronic infections as a primary objective and suggested that the incidence of chronic infections could be a secondary objective if the surveillance system implemented allows for it. Otherwise, the chronic infections issue may be addressed through specific studies (on risk factors or immunopathogenesis). iv According to structure and decision by each country. TECHNICAL REPORT Options for national testing and surveillance for hepatitis E virus in the EU/EEA

2019 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control - Technical Guidance

34. Erratum to: What Middle Phalanx Base Fracture Characteristics are Most Reliable and Useful for Surgical Decision-making? (PubMed)

Erratum to: What Middle Phalanx Base Fracture Characteristics are Most Reliable and Useful for Surgical Decision-making? 26842233 2016 06 30 2016 03 23 1528-1132 474 4 2016 Apr Clinical orthopaedics and related research Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. Erratum to: What Middle Phalanx Base Fracture Characteristics are Most Reliable and Useful for Surgical Decision-making? 1080-1 10.1007/s11999-016-4728-0 Janssen Stein J SJ Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yawkey (...) Barreto C J R C Nyszkiewicz R R Sodha S S Ruchelsman D D Bonatz E E Walbeehm E T E Schumer E D E Suarez F F DeSilva G G Gaston R G R Hernandez G R G Nancollas M M Hofmeister E E Fanuele J C J Boretto J G J Choueka J J Huang J I J Wolf J M JM Erickson J M J Howlett J J Taras J J Wint J J Kakar S S Chivers K K Prommersberger K J KJ Lee K K Rumball K M K Kraan G A G Weiss L L Lattanza L L de Mendonça L A L Jr Paz L L Catalano L L 3rd Calcagni M M McAuliffe J J Darowish M M Costanzo R M R Wood M M MM

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2016 Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

35. Shared Decision-Making in Intensive Care Units. Executive Summary of the American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement (PubMed)

.201602-0269ED Kon Alexander A AA 1 Naval Medical Center San Diego San Diego, California. 2 University of California San Diego San Diego, California. Davidson Judy E JE 3 University of California Health System San Diego, California. Morrison Wynne W 4 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Danis Marion M 5 National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland and. White Douglas B DB 6 University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. eng Journal Article Practice (...) Guideline United States Am J Respir Crit Care Med 9421642 1073-449X AIM IM Clinical Decision-Making methods Critical Care methods Humans Intensive Care Units Societies, Medical United States 2016 4 21 6 0 2016 4 21 6 0 2017 12 27 6 0 ppublish 27097019 10.1164/rccm.201602-0269ED PMC4910896 Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3):748-51; discussion 755-6 17873188 Crit Care Med. 2004 Aug;32(8):1781-4 15286559 Virtual Mentor. 2012 Jul 01;14(7):545-50 23351289 Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):716-25 17485749 Crit

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2016 American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

36. The false promises of shared decision making in rehabilitation

The false promises of shared decision making in rehabilitation The false promises of shared decision making in rehabilitation Research into the role of the brain and mind in chronic pain The false promises of shared decision making in rehabilitation October 25, 2016 by In the recent years, Shared Decision Making (SDM) has been increasingly advocated as an ideal model of treatment decision-making during the medical encounter, as it has been shown to increase benefits for both clinicians (...) pain in vulnerable populations (ie: elderly, critical care). References [1] Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. The New England journal of medicine [Internet]. 2013;368(1):6–8. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1209500\nhttp://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1209500\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23281971 [2] Legare F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine

2016 Body in Mind blog

37. Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life Is a Predictor of Outcomes in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Treated With Left Ventricular Assist Device Compared With Medical Management: Results From the ROADMAP Study (Risk Assessment and Comparative E (PubMed)

Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life Is a Predictor of Outcomes in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Treated With Left Ventricular Assist Device Compared With Medical Management: Results From the ROADMAP Study (Risk Assessment and Comparative E The prospective observational ROADMAP study (Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management) demonstrated that ambulatory advanced heart failure patients selected for left ventricular (...) assist device (LVAD) were more likely to be alive at 1 year on original therapy with ≥75-m improvement in 6-minute walk distance compared with patients assigned to optimal medical management. Whether baseline health-related quality of life (hrQoL) resulted in a heterogeneity of this treatment benefit is unknown.Patient-reported hrQoL was assessed with EuroQol questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS). We aimed to identify predictors of event-free survival and survival with acceptable hrQoL (VAS

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 Circulation. Heart failure

38. Varicella Zoster Virus glycoprotein E antigen (Shingrix) - Herpes Zoster

indicated that Varicella Zoster Virus glycoprotein E antigen was considered to be a new active substance. The application submitted is composed of administrative information, complete quality data, non- clinical and clinical data based on Applicants’ own tests and studies and/or bibliographic literature substituting/supporting certain tests or studies. Information on Paediatric requirements Pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006, the application included an EMA Decision P/0168/2013 (...) Varicella Zoster Virus glycoprotein E antigen (Shingrix) - Herpes Zoster 30 Churchill Place ? Canary Wharf ? London E14 5EU ? United Kingdom An agency of the European Union Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5520 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact 25 January 2018 EMA/88588/2018 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report Shingrix International non-proprietary name: herpes zoster vaccine (recombinant, adjuvanted) Procedure

2018 European Medicines Agency - EPARs

39. Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer

.19.00945 Journal of Clinical Oncology - published online before print May 31, 2019 PMID: Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update—Integration of Results From TAILORx , MD, PhD 1 x Fabrice Andre ; , MD 2 x Nofisat Ismaila ; , MD, PhD 3 x N. Lynn Henry ; , PhD 2 x Mark R. Somerfield ; , MD 4 x Robert C. Bast ; , PhD 5 x William Barlow ; 6 x Deborah E. Collyar ; , MD 7 x M. Elizabeth Hammond (...) For women with early-stage invasive breast cancer, which other biomarkers have demonstrated clinical utility to guide decisions on the need for adjuvant systemic therapy? Target Population Women with early-stage invasive breast cancer being considered for adjuvant systemic therapy. Target Audience Medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists; oncology nurses and physician assistants; pathologists; general practitioners; and patients. Methods An Expert Panel was convened to update the clinical practice

2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines

40. Methodology for Creating Expert Consensus Decision Pathways

; Michael E. DeBakey Medical Center—Director, Cardiac Care Unit Melissa Magwire Content Reviewer—Expert Consensus Decision Pathway Writing Committees Shawnee Mission Endocrinology & Diabetes—Clinical Supervisor Catherine M. Otto Content Reviewer—Expert Consensus Decision Pathway Writing Committees J. Ward Kennedy-Hamilton Endowed Chair in Cardiology—Editor-in-Chief, Heart; University of Washington—Professor of Medicine Sarah A. Spinler Content Reviewer—Roundtable Planning Committee Philadelphia College (...) Methodology for Creating Expert Consensus Decision Pathways METHODOLOGY DOCUMENT 2019 Methodology for Creating Expert Consensus Decision Pathways A Report of the American College of Cardiology Methodology Writing Committee James L. Januzzi JR, MD, FACC, Chair Tariq Ahmad, MD, MPH, FACC Lea G. Binder, MA William J. Hucker, MD, PHD Dharam J. Kumbhani, MD, SM, FACC Thomas M. Maddox, MD, MSC, FACC Joseph E. Marine, MD, MBA, FACC Pamela Bowe Morris, MD, FACC Solution Set Oversight Committee Ty J

2019 American College of Cardiology

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>