How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

10,974 results for

E/M Examination Criteria

by
...
Latest & greatest
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

21. E-learning of evidence-based healthcare (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals

systematic review examines the effectiveness of e-learning in improving evidence-based health care knowledge and practice. 6 The Campbell Collaboration | www.campbellcollaboration.org What studies were included? Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs, non-RCTs, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series of any healthcare professional evaluating any educational intervention on EBHC, and that was delivered fully (pure e-learning) or in part (blended (...) the effectiveness of specific dimensions of e-learning in increasing EBHC competencies, to assess how educational context influences the effectiveness of EBHC e-learning, and to assess how implementation approaches influence the effectiveness of EBHC e-learning. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, CINAHL, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME), Web of Knowledge, PsycInfo and dissertation databases (ProQuest) for relevant studies (24 May 2016). We examined reference lists

2017 Campbell Collaboration

22. Multi-criteria decision analysis for the appraisal of medical needs: a pilot study

: ? the conditions for and level of reimbursement, ? the cohort of patients eligible for ETR (i.e. inclusion- and exclusion criteria) and ? the budget needed for covering the product. Cohort decisions are defined by law e as decisions restricted in time and based on available economic and medical data. The budget is defined yearly. The agent who submits a request for a cohort decision is responsible for the execution of the programme, the designation of a responsible physician for handling the requests (...) a cohort decision exists for that patients’ indication and whether the patient satisfies the eligibility criteria. Patients who are included in the ETR programme have to give their informed consent. e Art. 25quater/1, §1 of the Wet betreffende de verplichte verzekering voor geneeskundige verzorging en uitkeringen, gecoördineerd op 14 juli 1994 KCE Report 272 Multi-criteria decision analysis for the appraisal of medical needs 11 Key points ? The unmet medical needs procedures foresees in the possibility

2016 Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre

23. Examining the Impact of Decriminalizing or Legalizing Cannabis for Recreational Use

Examining the Impact of Decriminalizing or Legalizing Cannabis for Recreational Use McMaster Health Forum 1 Evidence >> Insight >> Action Supported by the Michael G. DeGroote Initiative for Innovation in Healthcare Rapid Synthesis Examining the Impact of Decriminalizing or Legalizing Cannabis for Recreational Use 31 July 2017 McMaster Health Forum 1 Evidence >> Insight >> Action Rapid Synthesis: Examining the Impact of Decriminalizing or Legalizing Cannabis for Recreational Use 30-day response (...) 20 June 2017 20 JUNE 2017 Examining the Impact of Decriminalizing or Legalizing Cannabis for Recreational Use 2 Evidence >> Insight >> Action McMaster Health Forum and Forum+ The goal of the McMaster Health Forum, and its Forum+ initiative, is to generate action on the pressing health- and social-system issues of our time, based on the best available research evidence and systematically elicited citizen values and stakeholder insights. We aim to strengthen health and social systems – locally

2017 McMaster Health Forum

24. Tissue pathway for histopathological examination of the placenta

for referral of placentas for pathological examination 14 Appendix B Sample request form for placental examination 15 Appendix C Triage system for placental examination based on clinical situation (with agreement of local clinicians) 16 Appendix D Summary table explanation of grades of evidence 17 Appendix E AGREE guideline monitoring sheet 18 NICE has accredited the process used by The Royal College of Pathologists to produce its tissue pathways. Accreditation is valid for 5 years from July 2017. More (...) histology reports issued within 42 days of receipt. CEff 070717 12 V2 FINAL 8 References 1. Roberts DJ, Oliva E. Clinical significance of placental examination in perinatal medicine. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:255 264. 2. Khong TY. From delivery suite to laboratory: optimizing returns from placental examination in medico-legal defence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;37:1 5. 3. The Royal College of Pathologists. Guidelines on staffing and workload for paediatric and perinatal pathology

2017 Royal College of Pathologists

25. Examining the Impact of Interprofessional Training and Patient Engagement on Falls Prevention

Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2008; 24(2): 193- 202. 10. Irvine L, Conroy SP, Sach T, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a day hospital falls prevention programme for screened community-dwelling older people at high risk of falls. Age and Ageing 2010; 39(6): 710-6. 11. Eckstrom E, Neal M, Cotrell V, et al. An interprofessional approach to reducing the risk of falls through enhanced collaborative practice. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 2016; 64(8): 1701-7. 12. Dauenhauer JA (...) -Reid M, Browne G, Gafni A, et al. The effects and costs of a multifactorial and interdisciplinary team approach to falls prevention for older home care clients 'at risk' for falling: A randomized controlled trial. Canadian Journal of Aging 2010; 29(1): 139-61. 16. Batchelor F, Hill K, Mackintosh S, Said C. What works in falls prevention after stroke?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2010; 41(8): 1715-22. 17. Coussement J, De Paepe L, Schwendimann R, Denhaerynck K, Dejaeger E, Milisen

2017 McMaster Health Forum

26. Examining the Public Provision and Funding of Clinical Genetic Tests

the clinical utility of the test was rated as being the most important criteria in decision-making. • Another primary study examined 55 coverage decisions of newborn genetic screenings, and found that stakeholder participation and transparency improved decision-making processes for determining what genetic tests to fund. • Each of the 11 decision-making frameworks that we identified call for the use of randomized control trials (RCTs) as the primary evidence base for evaluating genetic tests. • Common (...) or employer-based insurance Examining the Public Provision and Funding of Clinical Genetic Tests 8 • Predictive or susceptibility tests such as the BRCA1/2 breast cancer genetic test are covered if individuals meet specific criteria regarding personal medical history or family history (19) • Genetic testing for fertility treatments are not covered by OHIP (20) criteria, like the age of the mother and family history, or have abnormal ultrasound findings (21;22) • Quebec • Genetic testing and counselling

2017 McMaster Health Forum

27. Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models

Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models ` Rapid Synthesis Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models 10 October 2017 McMaster Health Forum 1 Evidence >> Insight >> Action Rapid Synthesis: Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models 30-day response 10 October 2017 Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models 2 Evidence >> Insight >> Action McMaster Health Forum For concerned citizens and influential thinkers and doers (...) with identifying, reviewing and synthesizing literature. We are especially grateful to Gioia Buckley and Rick Glazier for their insightful comments and suggestions. Citation Mattison CA, Wilson MG. Rapid synthesis: Examining the effects of value-based physician payment models. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum, 10 October 2017. Product registration numbers ISSN 2292-7999 (online) McMaster Health Forum 3 Evidence >> Insight >> Action KEY MESSAGES Questions • What value-based physician payment models have

2017 McMaster Health Forum

28. Best Practices on Periodicity of Examination, Preventive Dental Services, Anticipatory Guidance/Counseling, and Oral Treatment for Infants, Children, and Adolescents

? Pediatr Dent 2014;36(7):489-93. Davis EE, Deinard AS, Maiga EW. Doctor, my tooth hurts: The costs of incomplete dental care in the emergency room. J Pub Health Dent 2010;70(3):205-10. Kobayashi M, Chi D, Coldwell SE, Domoto P, Milgrom P. The effectiveness and estimated costs of the access to baby and child dentistry programs in Washington State. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(9):1257-63. Lee JY, Bouwens TJ, Savage MF, Vann WF Jr. Examining the cost-effectiveness of early dental visits. Pediatr Dent 2006;28 (...) (2):102-5, discussion 192-8. American Academy of Pediatrics. Early childhood caries in indigenous communities. Pediatr Dent 2011;127(6):1190-8. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Recordkeeping. Pediatr Dent 2018;40(6):401-8. Dean JA. Examination of the mouth and other relevant structures. In: McDonald and Avery’s Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 10th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Elsevier; 2016:1-16. Fontana M. Patient evaluation and risk assessment. In: Little JW, Falace DA, Miller CS, Rhodus

2018 American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

29. AIUM ACR SPR SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination for Detection and Assessment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

for the perfor- mance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters re?ect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition that deviations from these parameters will be needed in some cases, depending on patient needs and available equipment. Practices are encouraged to go beyond the parameters (...) in the diagnosis of developmen- tal hip dysplasia. Radiology 2007; 242:355–359. 2. Smergel E, Losik SB, Rosenberg HK. Sonography of hip dysplasia. Ultrasound Q 2004; 20:201–216. 3. Bache CE, Clegg J, Herron M. Risk factors for developmental dys- plasia of the hip: ultrasonographic ?ndings in the neonatal period. J Pediatr Orthop B 2002; 11:212–218. 4. Mulpuri K, Song KM, Gross RH, et al. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons evidence-based guideline on detection and nonoperative management of pediatric

2018 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

30. AIUM ACR SPR SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance and Interpretation of a Diagnostic Ultrasound Examination of the Extracranial Head and Neck

for the perfor- mance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters re?ect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition that deviations from these parameters will be needed in some cases, depending on patient needs and available equipment. Practices are encouraged to go beyond the parameters (...) ) Committee.JAmCollRadiol 2015; 12: 1272–1279. 11. Burke CJ, Thomas RH, Howlett D. Imaging the major salivary glands. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49:261–269. 12. Lee YY, Wong KT, King AD, Ahuja AT. Imaging of salivary gland tumours. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66:419–436. 13. Cornec D, Jousse-Joulin S, Pers JO, et al. Contribution of salivary gland ultrasonography to the diagnosis of Sjogren’s syndrome: toward new diagnostic criteria? Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65:216–225. 14. Theander E, Mandl T. Primary Sjogren’s syndrome

2018 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

31. The Utility of and Indications for Routine Pelvic Examination

of benefits and harms ( ). * Qaseem A, Humphrey LL, Harris R, Starkey M, Denberg TD. Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:67–72. † Bloomfield HE, Olson A, Greer N, Cantor A, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from (...) , Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, et al. Screening for gynecologic conditions with pelvic examination: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2017;317:947–53. Nguyen GT, Cronholm PF. The annual pelvic examination: preventive time not well spent. Am Fam Physician 2013;87:8–9. Qaseem A, Humphrey LL, Harris R, Starkey M, Denberg TD. Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians

2018 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

32. Recommendations on routine screening pelvic examination

, attitude and practices of women towards pelvic examination and Pap smear in Jamaica. N Am J Med Sci 2010;2(10):478-86. 21. Hesselius I, Lisper HO, Nordstrom A, Anshelm-Olson B, Odlund B. Comparison between participants and non-participants at a gynaecological mass screening. Scand J Soc Med 1975;3(3):129-38. 22. Wijma B, Gullberg M, Kjessler B. Attitudes towards pelvic examination in a random sample of Swedish women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77(4):422-8. 23. Armstrong L, Zabel E, Beydoun HA (...) examination and ovarian screening: Guidelines International Network, NICE, National Guideline Clearinghouse, US Preventive Services Task Force, and CMA Infobase. Five guidelines were identified; however, only the ACP guideline discussed the role of the pelvic examination, which was the topic of interest • Prescreen ACP guideline: ACP guideline was prescreened according to CTFPHC criteria (guideline must be based on a systematic review of the evidence, and the review must be readily available and must use

2016 CPG Infobase

33. AIUM Practice Parameter for Ultrasound Examinations in Reproductive Medicine and Infertility

community with parameters for the performance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the © 2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 14750 Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 1 parameters with the recognition that deviations from (...) (Embryonic Period) of Pregnancy E. ? ?Sonohysterography in Reproductive Medicine F. ? ?Sonosalpingography © 2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 14750 Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 3 V. Specifications for Individual Examinations A. Ultrasound Examination of the Female Pelvis for Infertility and Reproductive Medicine The following sections detail the examination to be performed for each organ and anatomic region in the female pelvis. All relevant structures

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

34. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of a Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Examination

and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in © 2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 14750 Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 2 each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition that deviations from these parameters will be needed in some cases (...) tissues. J. Planning and guiding an invasive procedure. K. Congenital or developmental anomalies. L. Postoperative or postprocedural evaluation. M. Joint laxity, stiffness, or decreased range of motion. N. Malalignment. O. Sensory deficits or paresthesias. P. Motor weakness. An MSK ultrasound examination should be performed when there is a valid medical reason. There are no absolute contraindications. IV. Written Request for the Examination The written or electronic request for an ultrasound

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

35. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of a Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Examination for Adults and Children

? ?American ? ?Institute ? ?of ? ?Ultrasound ? ?in ? ?Medicine 14750 ? ?Sweitzer ? ?Ln, ? ?Suite ? ?100 ? ?Laurel, ? ?MD ? ?20707-5906 ? ?USA www.aium.org 2 Practice ? ?parameters ? ?of ? ?the ? ?AIUM ? ?are ? ?intended ? ?to ? ?provide ? ?the ? ?medical ? ?ultrasound ? ?community ? ?with parameters ? ?for ? ?the ? ?performance ? ?and ? ?recording ? ?of ? ?high-quality ? ?ultrasound ? ?examinations. ? ?The parameters ? ?reflect ? ?what ? ?the ? ?AIUM ? ?considers ? ?the ? ?minimum ? ?criteria (...) . ? ??Pediatr ? ?Radiol 2001; ? ?31:461–469. 38. Nedelmann ? ?M, ? ?Stolz ? ?E, ? ?Gerriets ? ?T, ? ?et ? ?al. ? ?Consensus ? ?recommendations ? ?for ? ?transcranial color-coded ? ?duplex ? ?sonography ? ?for ? ?the ? ?assessment ? ?of ? ?intracranial ? ?arteries ? ?in ? ?clinical ? ?trials on ? ?acute ? ?stroke. ? ??Stroke ? ??2009; ? ?40:3238–3244. 39. Krejza ? ?J, ? ?Mariak ? ?Z, ? ?Melhem ? ?ER, ? ?Bert ? ?RJ. ? ?A ? ?guide ? ?to ? ?the ? ?identification ? ?of ? ?major ? ?cerebral arteries

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

36. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination of the Abdomen and/or Retroperitoneum

Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 2 Practice parameters of the AIUM are intended to provide the medical ultrasound community with parameters for the performance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition (...) of the appendix in children with suspected appendicitis: the additional value of secondary signs. Eur Radiol ? 2009; 19:455–461. 27. Epelman M, Daneman A, Navarro OM, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis: review of state-of-the-art imaging findings with pathologic correlation. ?Radiographics ? 2007; 27:285–305. 28. Migaleddu V, Scanu AM, Quaia E, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease. ?Gastroenterology ? 2009; 137:43–52. 29. Strobel D, Goertz RS, Bernatik

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

37. Effectiveness of M-health applications on hypertension management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Effectiveness of M-health applications on hypertension management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration (...) record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Timing and effect measures Timing and effect measures Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion

2019 PROSPERO

38. Vertigo control in M‚niŠre's disease following transmyringeal ventilation tube insertion: a systematic review on the current state of the evidence

Vertigo control in M‚niŠre's disease following transmyringeal ventilation tube insertion: a systematic review on the current state of the evidence Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content (...) of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Timing and effect measures Timing and effect measures Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria

2019 PROSPERO

39. Use of M-health as a strategy to improve the cardiovascular performance of cardiac patients belonging to the cardiovascular rehabilitation program

Use of M-health as a strategy to improve the cardiovascular performance of cardiac patients belonging to the cardiovascular rehabilitation program Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content (...) of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Timing and effect measures Timing and effect measures Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria

2019 PROSPERO

40. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination of the Neonatal and Infant Spine

this mission. Practice parameters of the AIUM are intended to provide the medical ultrasound community with parameters for the performance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal stan- dard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally fol- low the parameters with recognition that deviations from these param- eters will be needed (...) Pretorius, MD Tatjana Rundek, MD, PhD Khaled Sakhel, MD Ants Toi, MD Isabelle Wilkins, MD neonatalSpine.qxp_0616 6/29/16 4:02 PM Page 7References 1. Guggisberg D, Hadj-Rabia S, Viney C, et al. Skin markers of occult spinal dysraphism in children: a review of 54 cases. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140:1109–1115. 2. Izci Y, Gonul M, Gonul E. The diagnostic value of skin lesions in split cord malformations. J Clin Neurosci 2007; 14:860–863. 3. Kriss VM, Desai NS. Occult spinal dysraphism in neonates: assessment

2016 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>