How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

10,554 results for

E/M Examination Criteria

by
...
Latest & greatest
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

21. Tissue pathway for histopathological examination of the placenta

for referral of placentas for pathological examination 14 Appendix B Sample request form for placental examination 15 Appendix C Triage system for placental examination based on clinical situation (with agreement of local clinicians) 16 Appendix D Summary table explanation of grades of evidence 17 Appendix E AGREE guideline monitoring sheet 18 NICE has accredited the process used by The Royal College of Pathologists to produce its tissue pathways. Accreditation is valid for 5 years from July 2017. More (...) histology reports issued within 42 days of receipt. CEff 070717 12 V2 FINAL 8 References 1. Roberts DJ, Oliva E. Clinical significance of placental examination in perinatal medicine. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:255 264. 2. Khong TY. From delivery suite to laboratory: optimizing returns from placental examination in medico-legal defence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;37:1 5. 3. The Royal College of Pathologists. Guidelines on staffing and workload for paediatric and perinatal pathology

2017 Royal College of Pathologists

22. Examining the Impact of Interprofessional Training and Patient Engagement on Falls Prevention

Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2008; 24(2): 193- 202. 10. Irvine L, Conroy SP, Sach T, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a day hospital falls prevention programme for screened community-dwelling older people at high risk of falls. Age and Ageing 2010; 39(6): 710-6. 11. Eckstrom E, Neal M, Cotrell V, et al. An interprofessional approach to reducing the risk of falls through enhanced collaborative practice. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 2016; 64(8): 1701-7. 12. Dauenhauer JA (...) -Reid M, Browne G, Gafni A, et al. The effects and costs of a multifactorial and interdisciplinary team approach to falls prevention for older home care clients 'at risk' for falling: A randomized controlled trial. Canadian Journal of Aging 2010; 29(1): 139-61. 16. Batchelor F, Hill K, Mackintosh S, Said C. What works in falls prevention after stroke?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2010; 41(8): 1715-22. 17. Coussement J, De Paepe L, Schwendimann R, Denhaerynck K, Dejaeger E, Milisen

2017 McMaster Health Forum

23. Examining the Public Provision and Funding of Clinical Genetic Tests

the clinical utility of the test was rated as being the most important criteria in decision-making. • Another primary study examined 55 coverage decisions of newborn genetic screenings, and found that stakeholder participation and transparency improved decision-making processes for determining what genetic tests to fund. • Each of the 11 decision-making frameworks that we identified call for the use of randomized control trials (RCTs) as the primary evidence base for evaluating genetic tests. • Common (...) or employer-based insurance Examining the Public Provision and Funding of Clinical Genetic Tests 8 • Predictive or susceptibility tests such as the BRCA1/2 breast cancer genetic test are covered if individuals meet specific criteria regarding personal medical history or family history (19) • Genetic testing for fertility treatments are not covered by OHIP (20) criteria, like the age of the mother and family history, or have abnormal ultrasound findings (21;22) • Quebec • Genetic testing and counselling

2017 McMaster Health Forum

24. Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models

Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models ` Rapid Synthesis Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models 10 October 2017 McMaster Health Forum 1 Evidence >> Insight >> Action Rapid Synthesis: Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models 30-day response 10 October 2017 Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models 2 Evidence >> Insight >> Action McMaster Health Forum For concerned citizens and influential thinkers and doers (...) with identifying, reviewing and synthesizing literature. We are especially grateful to Gioia Buckley and Rick Glazier for their insightful comments and suggestions. Citation Mattison CA, Wilson MG. Rapid synthesis: Examining the effects of value-based physician payment models. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum, 10 October 2017. Product registration numbers ISSN 2292-7999 (online) McMaster Health Forum 3 Evidence >> Insight >> Action KEY MESSAGES Questions • What value-based physician payment models have

2017 McMaster Health Forum

25. Best Practices on Periodicity of Examination, Preventive Dental Services, Anticipatory Guidance/Counseling, and Oral Treatment for Infants, Children, and Adolescents

? Pediatr Dent 2014;36(7):489-93. Davis EE, Deinard AS, Maiga EW. Doctor, my tooth hurts: The costs of incomplete dental care in the emergency room. J Pub Health Dent 2010;70(3):205-10. Kobayashi M, Chi D, Coldwell SE, Domoto P, Milgrom P. The effectiveness and estimated costs of the access to baby and child dentistry programs in Washington State. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(9):1257-63. Lee JY, Bouwens TJ, Savage MF, Vann WF Jr. Examining the cost-effectiveness of early dental visits. Pediatr Dent 2006;28 (...) (2):102-5, discussion 192-8. American Academy of Pediatrics. Early childhood caries in indigenous communities. Pediatr Dent 2011;127(6):1190-8. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Recordkeeping. Pediatr Dent 2018;40(6):401-8. Dean JA. Examination of the mouth and other relevant structures. In: McDonald and Avery’s Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 10th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Elsevier; 2016:1-16. Fontana M. Patient evaluation and risk assessment. In: Little JW, Falace DA, Miller CS, Rhodus

2018 American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

26. AIUM ACR SPR SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination for Detection and Assessment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

for the perfor- mance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters re?ect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition that deviations from these parameters will be needed in some cases, depending on patient needs and available equipment. Practices are encouraged to go beyond the parameters (...) in the diagnosis of developmen- tal hip dysplasia. Radiology 2007; 242:355–359. 2. Smergel E, Losik SB, Rosenberg HK. Sonography of hip dysplasia. Ultrasound Q 2004; 20:201–216. 3. Bache CE, Clegg J, Herron M. Risk factors for developmental dys- plasia of the hip: ultrasonographic ?ndings in the neonatal period. J Pediatr Orthop B 2002; 11:212–218. 4. Mulpuri K, Song KM, Gross RH, et al. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons evidence-based guideline on detection and nonoperative management of pediatric

2018 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

27. AIUM ACR SPR SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance and Interpretation of a Diagnostic Ultrasound Examination of the Extracranial Head and Neck

for the perfor- mance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters re?ect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition that deviations from these parameters will be needed in some cases, depending on patient needs and available equipment. Practices are encouraged to go beyond the parameters (...) ) Committee.JAmCollRadiol 2015; 12: 1272–1279. 11. Burke CJ, Thomas RH, Howlett D. Imaging the major salivary glands. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49:261–269. 12. Lee YY, Wong KT, King AD, Ahuja AT. Imaging of salivary gland tumours. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66:419–436. 13. Cornec D, Jousse-Joulin S, Pers JO, et al. Contribution of salivary gland ultrasonography to the diagnosis of Sjogren’s syndrome: toward new diagnostic criteria? Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65:216–225. 14. Theander E, Mandl T. Primary Sjogren’s syndrome

2018 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

28. The Utility of and Indications for Routine Pelvic Examination

of benefits and harms ( ). * Qaseem A, Humphrey LL, Harris R, Starkey M, Denberg TD. Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:67–72. † Bloomfield HE, Olson A, Greer N, Cantor A, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from (...) , Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, et al. Screening for gynecologic conditions with pelvic examination: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2017;317:947–53. Nguyen GT, Cronholm PF. The annual pelvic examination: preventive time not well spent. Am Fam Physician 2013;87:8–9. Qaseem A, Humphrey LL, Harris R, Starkey M, Denberg TD. Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians

2018 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

29. Recommendations on routine screening pelvic examination

, attitude and practices of women towards pelvic examination and Pap smear in Jamaica. N Am J Med Sci 2010;2(10):478-86. 21. Hesselius I, Lisper HO, Nordstrom A, Anshelm-Olson B, Odlund B. Comparison between participants and non-participants at a gynaecological mass screening. Scand J Soc Med 1975;3(3):129-38. 22. Wijma B, Gullberg M, Kjessler B. Attitudes towards pelvic examination in a random sample of Swedish women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77(4):422-8. 23. Armstrong L, Zabel E, Beydoun HA (...) examination and ovarian screening: Guidelines International Network, NICE, National Guideline Clearinghouse, US Preventive Services Task Force, and CMA Infobase. Five guidelines were identified; however, only the ACP guideline discussed the role of the pelvic examination, which was the topic of interest • Prescreen ACP guideline: ACP guideline was prescreened according to CTFPHC criteria (guideline must be based on a systematic review of the evidence, and the review must be readily available and must use

2016 CPG Infobase

30. AIUM Practice Parameter for Ultrasound Examinations in Reproductive Medicine and Infertility

community with parameters for the performance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the © 2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 14750 Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 1 parameters with the recognition that deviations from (...) (Embryonic Period) of Pregnancy E. ? ?Sonohysterography in Reproductive Medicine F. ? ?Sonosalpingography © 2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 14750 Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 3 V. Specifications for Individual Examinations A. Ultrasound Examination of the Female Pelvis for Infertility and Reproductive Medicine The following sections detail the examination to be performed for each organ and anatomic region in the female pelvis. All relevant structures

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

31. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of a Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Examination

and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in © 2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 14750 Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 2 each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition that deviations from these parameters will be needed in some cases (...) tissues. J. Planning and guiding an invasive procedure. K. Congenital or developmental anomalies. L. Postoperative or postprocedural evaluation. M. Joint laxity, stiffness, or decreased range of motion. N. Malalignment. O. Sensory deficits or paresthesias. P. Motor weakness. An MSK ultrasound examination should be performed when there is a valid medical reason. There are no absolute contraindications. IV. Written Request for the Examination The written or electronic request for an ultrasound

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

32. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of a Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Examination for Adults and Children

? ?American ? ?Institute ? ?of ? ?Ultrasound ? ?in ? ?Medicine 14750 ? ?Sweitzer ? ?Ln, ? ?Suite ? ?100 ? ?Laurel, ? ?MD ? ?20707-5906 ? ?USA www.aium.org 2 Practice ? ?parameters ? ?of ? ?the ? ?AIUM ? ?are ? ?intended ? ?to ? ?provide ? ?the ? ?medical ? ?ultrasound ? ?community ? ?with parameters ? ?for ? ?the ? ?performance ? ?and ? ?recording ? ?of ? ?high-quality ? ?ultrasound ? ?examinations. ? ?The parameters ? ?reflect ? ?what ? ?the ? ?AIUM ? ?considers ? ?the ? ?minimum ? ?criteria (...) . ? ??Pediatr ? ?Radiol 2001; ? ?31:461–469. 38. Nedelmann ? ?M, ? ?Stolz ? ?E, ? ?Gerriets ? ?T, ? ?et ? ?al. ? ?Consensus ? ?recommendations ? ?for ? ?transcranial color-coded ? ?duplex ? ?sonography ? ?for ? ?the ? ?assessment ? ?of ? ?intracranial ? ?arteries ? ?in ? ?clinical ? ?trials on ? ?acute ? ?stroke. ? ??Stroke ? ??2009; ? ?40:3238–3244. 39. Krejza ? ?J, ? ?Mariak ? ?Z, ? ?Melhem ? ?ER, ? ?Bert ? ?RJ. ? ?A ? ?guide ? ?to ? ?the ? ?identification ? ?of ? ?major ? ?cerebral arteries

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

33. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination of the Abdomen and/or Retroperitoneum

Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 2 Practice parameters of the AIUM are intended to provide the medical ultrasound community with parameters for the performance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition (...) of the appendix in children with suspected appendicitis: the additional value of secondary signs. Eur Radiol ? 2009; 19:455–461. 27. Epelman M, Daneman A, Navarro OM, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis: review of state-of-the-art imaging findings with pathologic correlation. ?Radiographics ? 2007; 27:285–305. 28. Migaleddu V, Scanu AM, Quaia E, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease. ?Gastroenterology ? 2009; 137:43–52. 29. Strobel D, Goertz RS, Bernatik

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

34. Effectiveness of M-health applications on hypertension management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Effectiveness of M-health applications on hypertension management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration (...) record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Timing and effect measures Timing and effect measures Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion

2019 PROSPERO

35. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination of the Neonatal and Infant Spine

this mission. Practice parameters of the AIUM are intended to provide the medical ultrasound community with parameters for the performance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal stan- dard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally fol- low the parameters with recognition that deviations from these param- eters will be needed (...) Pretorius, MD Tatjana Rundek, MD, PhD Khaled Sakhel, MD Ants Toi, MD Isabelle Wilkins, MD neonatalSpine.qxp_0616 6/29/16 4:02 PM Page 7References 1. Guggisberg D, Hadj-Rabia S, Viney C, et al. Skin markers of occult spinal dysraphism in children: a review of 54 cases. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140:1109–1115. 2. Izci Y, Gonul M, Gonul E. The diagnostic value of skin lesions in split cord malformations. J Clin Neurosci 2007; 14:860–863. 3. Kriss VM, Desai NS. Occult spinal dysraphism in neonates: assessment

2016 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

36. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination of the Extracranial Cerebrovascular System

. Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria. J Endovasc Ther 2005; 12:346–353. 32. Zhou W, Felkai DD, Evans M, et al. Ultrasound criteria for severe in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47:74–80. 33. AIUM Practice Parameter for Documentation of an Ultrasound Examination. 2014. http://www.aium.org/resources/guidelines/documentation.pdf 34. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM Standards and Guidelines for the Accreditation (...) it will continue to advance this mission. Practice parameters of the AIUM are intended to provide the medical ultrasound community with parameters for the performance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal stan- dard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally fol- low the parameters with recognition that deviations from

2016 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

37. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published in the March 2015 issue of Genetics in M

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published in the March 2015 issue of Genetics in M Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology | Genetics in Medicine Thank you (...) , this recommendation describes a process for classifying variants into these five categories based on criteria using typical types of variant evidence (e.g., population data, computational data, functional data, segregation data). Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends that clinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–approved laboratory

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2015 Association for Molecular Pathology

38. Revision of the Jones Criteria for the Diagnosis of Acute Rheumatic Fever in the Era of Doppler Echocardiography

and the rationale for their application to help identify changes in valvar status associated with ARF are discussed below. These changes are listed in and and are analogous to valvular abnormalities also described in RHD in the recent World Heart Federation statement on that condition. Table 3. Doppler Findings in Rheumatic Valvulitis Pathological mitral regurgitation (all 4 criteria met) Seen in at least 2 views Jet length ≥2 cm in at least 1 view Peak velocity >3 m/s Pansystolic jet in at least 1 envelope (...) Pathological aortic regurgitation (all 4 criteria met) Seen in at least 2 views Jet length ≥1 cm in at least 1 view Peak velocity >3 m/s Pan diastolic jet in at least 1 envelope Loading conditions should be accounted for at time of echocardiography/Doppler assessment (see the section Differential Diagnosis of ARF for a full discussion). This table reflects an amalgam of the findings from the references listed in and other guideline statements , and also resembles findings described in rheumatic heart

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2015 American Heart Association

39. Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke

on Epidemiology and Prevention Bart M. Demaerschalk , Dawn O. Kleindorfer , Opeolu M. Adeoye , Andrew M. Demchuk , Jennifer E. Fugate , James C. Grotta , Alexander A. Khalessi , Elad I. Levy , Yuko Y. Palesch , Shyam Prabhakaran , Gustavo Saposnik , Jeffrey L. Saver , and Eric E. Smith and on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Originally published 22 Dec 2015 Stroke. 2015;47:581–641 You are viewing the most recent version of this article (...) Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke | Stroke Search Hello Guest! Login to your account Email Password Keep me logged in Search April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 February 2019 January 2019 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Free Access article

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2015 American Heart Association

40. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use

Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use Department of Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland Fax: +41 22 791 4171 E-mail: reproductivehealth@who.int www.who.int/reproductivehealth For more information, please contact: COCs Barrier methods IUDs Fertility awareness-based methods Lactational Coitus interruptus Copper IUD for amenorrhoea Patch Female surgical sterilization Intrauterine devices CICs emergency contraception (...) study): incidence ratio 9.2 (95% CI 6.5–13) CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio. a Based on 5 studies, 4 of which reported incidence by week and 1 of which reported the proportion of VTE events by week. b Based on 6 studies.Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use - Part I | 37 References 1. Jackson E, Glasier A. Return of ovulation and menses in postpartum nonlactating women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):657–62. 2. Petersen JF, Bergholt T, Nielsen AK, Paidas MJ

2015 World Health Organisation Guidelines

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>