How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

11,372 results for

E/M Examination Criteria

by
...
Latest & greatest
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

21. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in Valvular Heart Disease

, FAHA Nicole M. Bhave, MD, FACC Alan S. Brown, MD, FACCxx Stacie L. Daugherty, MD, FACC Larry S. Dean, MD, FACC, MSCAI Milind Y. Desai, MBBS, FACC Claire S. Duvernoy, MD, FACCxx Linda D. Gillam, MD, FACC Robert C. Hendel, MD, FACC, FAHAxx Christopher M. Kramer, MD, FACC, FAHAkk Bruce D. Lindsay, MD, FACCxx Warren J. Manning, MD, FACC Praveen Mehrotra, MD, FACC, FASE Manesh R. Patel, MD, FACC, FSCAI, FAHA{{ Ritu Sachdeva, MBBS, FACC L. Samuel Wann, MD, MACCxx David E. Winchester, MD, FACC Michael J (...) or Worsening Symptoms or to Guide Therapy Indication TTE TEE (With Possible 3D) 3D TTE Ex.-SE DSE Low-Dose DSE RVG FDG- PET MPI (SPECT/ PET) CMR CCT ANG Fluoro General 55. n Re-evaluationofknownVHD with a change in clinical status or cardiac examination or to guide therapy A (9) M (5) R (1) R (3) R (1) R (1) R (1) R (1) R (3) R (1) R (1) R (1) Endocarditis 56. n Re-evaluationofIEinapatient with a change in clinical status or cardiac examination (e.g., new murmur, embolism, persistent fever, HF, abscess

2017 Heart Rhythm Society

22. AIUM/IUGA Practice Parameter for the Performance of Urogynecological Ultrasound Examinations

Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:461–466. 23. Unger CA, Weinstein MM, Pretorius DH. Pelvic ?oor imaging. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2011; 38:23–43, vii. 24. Jung SA, Pretorius DH, Weinstein M, Nager CW, Den-Boer D, Mittal RK. Closure mechanism of the anal canal in women: assessed by three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Dis Colon Rec- tum 2008; 51:932–939. 25. Shobeiri SA, Leclaire E, Nihira MA, Quiroz LH, O’Donoghue D. Appearance of the levator ani muscle subdivisions in endovaginal three-dimensional (...) AIUM/IUGA Practice Parameter for the Performance of Urogynecological Ultrasound Examinations PRACTICEPARAMETERS AIUM/IUGA Practice Parameter for the Performance of Urogynecological Ultrasound Examinations Developed in Collaboration with the ACR, the AUGS, the AUA, and the SRU I. Introduction T he clinical aspects of this parameter were developed by the AIUM/IUGA Collaborative Committee in collabora- tion with other organizations whose members use ultrasound for performing pelvic floor

2019 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

23. Exploratory examination of the need for revision of the DMP "coronary heart disease"

Internal Commission No.: V15-01 Address of publisher: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care Im Mediapark 8 50670 Köln Germany Tel.: +49 221 35685-0 Fax: +49 221 35685-1 E-mail: berichte@iqwig.de Internet: www.iqwig.deExtract of rapid report V15-01 Version 1.0 Exploratory examination of the need for revision of the DMP CHD 18 Feb 2016 Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) - ii - This report was prepared in collaboration with external experts. The responsibility (...) V15-01 Version 1.0 Exploratory examination of the need for revision of the DMP CHD 18 Feb 2016 Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) - 7 - 4 Results 4.1 Results of information retrieval 4.1.1 Search in guideline databases and on websites of guideline providers The systematic Internet search yielded 36 potentially relevant documents after title and abstract screening, which were screened in full text. After evaluation of the general and methodological inclusion criteria, 13

2017 Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare (IQWiG)

24. Best Practices on Periodicity of Examination, Preventive Dental Services, Anticipatory Guidance/Counseling, and Oral Treatment for Infants, Children, and Adolescents

? Pediatr Dent 2014;36(7):489-93. Davis EE, Deinard AS, Maiga EW. Doctor, my tooth hurts: The costs of incomplete dental care in the emergency room. J Pub Health Dent 2010;70(3):205-10. Kobayashi M, Chi D, Coldwell SE, Domoto P, Milgrom P. The effectiveness and estimated costs of the access to baby and child dentistry programs in Washington State. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(9):1257-63. Lee JY, Bouwens TJ, Savage MF, Vann WF Jr. Examining the cost-effectiveness of early dental visits. Pediatr Dent 2006;28 (...) (2):102-5, discussion 192-8. American Academy of Pediatrics. Early childhood caries in indigenous communities. Pediatr Dent 2011;127(6):1190-8. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Recordkeeping. Pediatr Dent 2018;40(6):401-8. Dean JA. Examination of the mouth and other relevant structures. In: McDonald and Avery’s Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 10th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Elsevier; 2016:1-16. Fontana M. Patient evaluation and risk assessment. In: Little JW, Falace DA, Miller CS, Rhodus

2018 American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

25. E-learning of evidence-based healthcare (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals

systematic review examines the effectiveness of e-learning in improving evidence-based health care knowledge and practice. 6 The Campbell Collaboration | www.campbellcollaboration.org What studies were included? Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs, non-RCTs, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series of any healthcare professional evaluating any educational intervention on EBHC, and that was delivered fully (pure e-learning) or in part (blended (...) the effectiveness of specific dimensions of e-learning in increasing EBHC competencies, to assess how educational context influences the effectiveness of EBHC e-learning, and to assess how implementation approaches influence the effectiveness of EBHC e-learning. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, CINAHL, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME), Web of Knowledge, PsycInfo and dissertation databases (ProQuest) for relevant studies (24 May 2016). We examined reference lists

2017 Campbell Collaboration

26. The Utility of and Indications for Routine Pelvic Examination

of benefits and harms ( ). * Qaseem A, Humphrey LL, Harris R, Starkey M, Denberg TD. Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:67–72. † Bloomfield HE, Olson A, Greer N, Cantor A, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from (...) , Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, et al. Screening for gynecologic conditions with pelvic examination: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2017;317:947–53. Nguyen GT, Cronholm PF. The annual pelvic examination: preventive time not well spent. Am Fam Physician 2013;87:8–9. Qaseem A, Humphrey LL, Harris R, Starkey M, Denberg TD. Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians

2018 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

27. Examining the Impact of Interprofessional Training and Patient Engagement on Falls Prevention

Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2008; 24(2): 193- 202. 10. Irvine L, Conroy SP, Sach T, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a day hospital falls prevention programme for screened community-dwelling older people at high risk of falls. Age and Ageing 2010; 39(6): 710-6. 11. Eckstrom E, Neal M, Cotrell V, et al. An interprofessional approach to reducing the risk of falls through enhanced collaborative practice. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 2016; 64(8): 1701-7. 12. Dauenhauer JA (...) -Reid M, Browne G, Gafni A, et al. The effects and costs of a multifactorial and interdisciplinary team approach to falls prevention for older home care clients 'at risk' for falling: A randomized controlled trial. Canadian Journal of Aging 2010; 29(1): 139-61. 16. Batchelor F, Hill K, Mackintosh S, Said C. What works in falls prevention after stroke?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2010; 41(8): 1715-22. 17. Coussement J, De Paepe L, Schwendimann R, Denhaerynck K, Dejaeger E, Milisen

2017 McMaster Health Forum

28. Examining the Impact of Decriminalizing or Legalizing Cannabis for Recreational Use

Examining the Impact of Decriminalizing or Legalizing Cannabis for Recreational Use McMaster Health Forum 1 Evidence >> Insight >> Action Supported by the Michael G. DeGroote Initiative for Innovation in Healthcare Rapid Synthesis Examining the Impact of Decriminalizing or Legalizing Cannabis for Recreational Use 31 July 2017 McMaster Health Forum 1 Evidence >> Insight >> Action Rapid Synthesis: Examining the Impact of Decriminalizing or Legalizing Cannabis for Recreational Use 30-day response (...) 20 June 2017 20 JUNE 2017 Examining the Impact of Decriminalizing or Legalizing Cannabis for Recreational Use 2 Evidence >> Insight >> Action McMaster Health Forum and Forum+ The goal of the McMaster Health Forum, and its Forum+ initiative, is to generate action on the pressing health- and social-system issues of our time, based on the best available research evidence and systematically elicited citizen values and stakeholder insights. We aim to strengthen health and social systems – locally

2017 McMaster Health Forum

29. Examining the Public Provision and Funding of Clinical Genetic Tests

the clinical utility of the test was rated as being the most important criteria in decision-making. • Another primary study examined 55 coverage decisions of newborn genetic screenings, and found that stakeholder participation and transparency improved decision-making processes for determining what genetic tests to fund. • Each of the 11 decision-making frameworks that we identified call for the use of randomized control trials (RCTs) as the primary evidence base for evaluating genetic tests. • Common (...) or employer-based insurance Examining the Public Provision and Funding of Clinical Genetic Tests 8 • Predictive or susceptibility tests such as the BRCA1/2 breast cancer genetic test are covered if individuals meet specific criteria regarding personal medical history or family history (19) • Genetic testing for fertility treatments are not covered by OHIP (20) criteria, like the age of the mother and family history, or have abnormal ultrasound findings (21;22) • Quebec • Genetic testing and counselling

2017 McMaster Health Forum

30. Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models

Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models ` Rapid Synthesis Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models 10 October 2017 McMaster Health Forum 1 Evidence >> Insight >> Action Rapid Synthesis: Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models 30-day response 10 October 2017 Examining the Effects of Value-based Physician Payment Models 2 Evidence >> Insight >> Action McMaster Health Forum For concerned citizens and influential thinkers and doers (...) with identifying, reviewing and synthesizing literature. We are especially grateful to Gioia Buckley and Rick Glazier for their insightful comments and suggestions. Citation Mattison CA, Wilson MG. Rapid synthesis: Examining the effects of value-based physician payment models. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum, 10 October 2017. Product registration numbers ISSN 2292-7999 (online) McMaster Health Forum 3 Evidence >> Insight >> Action KEY MESSAGES Questions • What value-based physician payment models have

2017 McMaster Health Forum

31. Tissue pathway for histopathological examination of the placenta

for referral of placentas for pathological examination 14 Appendix B Sample request form for placental examination 15 Appendix C Triage system for placental examination based on clinical situation (with agreement of local clinicians) 16 Appendix D Summary table explanation of grades of evidence 17 Appendix E AGREE guideline monitoring sheet 18 NICE has accredited the process used by The Royal College of Pathologists to produce its tissue pathways. Accreditation is valid for 5 years from July 2017. More (...) histology reports issued within 42 days of receipt. CEff 070717 12 V2 FINAL 8 References 1. Roberts DJ, Oliva E. Clinical significance of placental examination in perinatal medicine. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:255 264. 2. Khong TY. From delivery suite to laboratory: optimizing returns from placental examination in medico-legal defence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;37:1 5. 3. The Royal College of Pathologists. Guidelines on staffing and workload for paediatric and perinatal pathology

2017 Royal College of Pathologists

32. AIUM ACR SPR SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination for Detection and Assessment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

for the perfor- mance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters re?ect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition that deviations from these parameters will be needed in some cases, depending on patient needs and available equipment. Practices are encouraged to go beyond the parameters (...) in the diagnosis of developmen- tal hip dysplasia. Radiology 2007; 242:355–359. 2. Smergel E, Losik SB, Rosenberg HK. Sonography of hip dysplasia. Ultrasound Q 2004; 20:201–216. 3. Bache CE, Clegg J, Herron M. Risk factors for developmental dys- plasia of the hip: ultrasonographic ?ndings in the neonatal period. J Pediatr Orthop B 2002; 11:212–218. 4. Mulpuri K, Song KM, Gross RH, et al. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons evidence-based guideline on detection and nonoperative management of pediatric

2018 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

33. AIUM ACR SPR SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance and Interpretation of a Diagnostic Ultrasound Examination of the Extracranial Head and Neck

for the perfor- mance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters re?ect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition that deviations from these parameters will be needed in some cases, depending on patient needs and available equipment. Practices are encouraged to go beyond the parameters (...) ) Committee.JAmCollRadiol 2015; 12: 1272–1279. 11. Burke CJ, Thomas RH, Howlett D. Imaging the major salivary glands. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49:261–269. 12. Lee YY, Wong KT, King AD, Ahuja AT. Imaging of salivary gland tumours. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66:419–436. 13. Cornec D, Jousse-Joulin S, Pers JO, et al. Contribution of salivary gland ultrasonography to the diagnosis of Sjogren’s syndrome: toward new diagnostic criteria? Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65:216–225. 14. Theander E, Mandl T. Primary Sjogren’s syndrome

2018 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

34. Forensic Nurse Examiners versus Doctors for the Forensic Examination of Rape and Sexual Assault Complainants: A Systematic Review

Forensic Nurse Examiners versus Doctors for the Forensic Examination of Rape and Sexual Assault Complainants: A Systematic Review Campbell Systematic Reviews 2014:5 First published: 01 May, 2014 Search executed February, 2012 Forensic Nurse Examiners versus Doctors for the Forensic Examination of Rape and Sexual Assault Complainants: A Systematic Review Clare Toon & Kurinchi Gurusamy Colophon Title Forensic Nurse Examiners versus Doctors for the Forensic Examination of Rape and Sexual Assault (...) Complainants: A Systematic Review Institution The Campbell Collaboration Authors Toon, Clare Gurusamy, Kurinchi DOI 10.4073/csr.2014.5 No. of pages 56 Last updated 25 January, 2013 Citation Toon C, Gurusamy K. Forensic Nurse Examiners Versus Doctors for the Forensic Examination of Rape and Sexual Assault Complainants: A Systematic Review Campbell Systematic Reviews 2014:5 DOI: 10.4073/csr.2014.5 ISSN 1891-1803 Copyright © Toon & Gurusamy This is an open-access article distributed under the terms

2014 Campbell Collaboration

35. Effects of e-learning and m-learning in continuing education among nurses: an overview of systematic reviews (protocol)

Effects of e-learning and m-learning in continuing education among nurses: an overview of systematic reviews (protocol) Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence (...) analgesics used in the clinic Full text-screening: As above, with the addition of: 7. No relevant outcome measure reported ">Prioritise the exclusion criteria Example: Two reviewers will independently extract data from each article. We first try to extract numerical data from tables, text or figures. If these are not reported, we will extract data from graphs using digital ruler software. In case data are not reported or unclear, we will attempt to contact authors by e-mail (max. 2 attempts). In case

2016 PROSPERO

36. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of a Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Examination for Adults and Children

? ?American ? ?Institute ? ?of ? ?Ultrasound ? ?in ? ?Medicine 14750 ? ?Sweitzer ? ?Ln, ? ?Suite ? ?100 ? ?Laurel, ? ?MD ? ?20707-5906 ? ?USA www.aium.org 2 Practice ? ?parameters ? ?of ? ?the ? ?AIUM ? ?are ? ?intended ? ?to ? ?provide ? ?the ? ?medical ? ?ultrasound ? ?community ? ?with parameters ? ?for ? ?the ? ?performance ? ?and ? ?recording ? ?of ? ?high-quality ? ?ultrasound ? ?examinations. ? ?The parameters ? ?reflect ? ?what ? ?the ? ?AIUM ? ?considers ? ?the ? ?minimum ? ?criteria (...) . ? ??Pediatr ? ?Radiol 2001; ? ?31:461–469. 38. Nedelmann ? ?M, ? ?Stolz ? ?E, ? ?Gerriets ? ?T, ? ?et ? ?al. ? ?Consensus ? ?recommendations ? ?for ? ?transcranial color-coded ? ?duplex ? ?sonography ? ?for ? ?the ? ?assessment ? ?of ? ?intracranial ? ?arteries ? ?in ? ?clinical ? ?trials on ? ?acute ? ?stroke. ? ??Stroke ? ??2009; ? ?40:3238–3244. 39. Krejza ? ?J, ? ?Mariak ? ?Z, ? ?Melhem ? ?ER, ? ?Bert ? ?RJ. ? ?A ? ?guide ? ?to ? ?the ? ?identification ? ?of ? ?major ? ?cerebral arteries

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

37. AIUM Practice Parameter for Ultrasound Examinations in Reproductive Medicine and Infertility

community with parameters for the performance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the © 2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 14750 Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 1 parameters with the recognition that deviations from (...) (Embryonic Period) of Pregnancy E. ? ?Sonohysterography in Reproductive Medicine F. ? ?Sonosalpingography © 2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 14750 Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 3 V. Specifications for Individual Examinations A. Ultrasound Examination of the Female Pelvis for Infertility and Reproductive Medicine The following sections detail the examination to be performed for each organ and anatomic region in the female pelvis. All relevant structures

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

38. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination of the Abdomen and/or Retroperitoneum

Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 2 Practice parameters of the AIUM are intended to provide the medical ultrasound community with parameters for the performance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition (...) of the appendix in children with suspected appendicitis: the additional value of secondary signs. Eur Radiol ? 2009; 19:455–461. 27. Epelman M, Daneman A, Navarro OM, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis: review of state-of-the-art imaging findings with pathologic correlation. ?Radiographics ? 2007; 27:285–305. 28. Migaleddu V, Scanu AM, Quaia E, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease. ?Gastroenterology ? 2009; 137:43–52. 29. Strobel D, Goertz RS, Bernatik

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

39. AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of a Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Examination

and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in © 2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 14750 Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 2 each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care. AIUM-accredited practices are expected to generally follow the parameters with recognition that deviations from these parameters will be needed in some cases (...) tissues. J. Planning and guiding an invasive procedure. K. Congenital or developmental anomalies. L. Postoperative or postprocedural evaluation. M. Joint laxity, stiffness, or decreased range of motion. N. Malalignment. O. Sensory deficits or paresthesias. P. Motor weakness. An MSK ultrasound examination should be performed when there is a valid medical reason. There are no absolute contraindications. IV. Written Request for the Examination The written or electronic request for an ultrasound

2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

40. Multi-criteria decision analysis for the appraisal of medical needs: a pilot study

: ? the conditions for and level of reimbursement, ? the cohort of patients eligible for ETR (i.e. inclusion- and exclusion criteria) and ? the budget needed for covering the product. Cohort decisions are defined by law e as decisions restricted in time and based on available economic and medical data. The budget is defined yearly. The agent who submits a request for a cohort decision is responsible for the execution of the programme, the designation of a responsible physician for handling the requests (...) a cohort decision exists for that patients’ indication and whether the patient satisfies the eligibility criteria. Patients who are included in the ETR programme have to give their informed consent. e Art. 25quater/1, §1 of the Wet betreffende de verplichte verzekering voor geneeskundige verzorging en uitkeringen, gecoördineerd op 14 juli 1994 KCE Report 272 Multi-criteria decision analysis for the appraisal of medical needs 11 Key points ? The unmet medical needs procedures foresees in the possibility

2016 Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>