How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

1,060 results for

Cervical Examination in Labor

by
...
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

1. Cervical Examination in Labor

Cervical Examination in Labor Cervical Examination in Labor Toggle navigation Brain Head & Neck Chest Endocrine Abdomen Musculoskeletal Skin Infectious Disease Hematology & Oncology Cohorts Diagnostics Emergency Findings Procedures Prevention & Management Pharmacy Resuscitation Trauma Emergency Procedures Ultrasound Cardiovascular Emergencies Lung Emergencies Infectious Disease Pediatrics Neurologic Emergencies Skin Exposure Miscellaneous Abuse Cancer Administration 4 Cervical Examination (...) in Labor Cervical Examination in Labor Aka: Cervical Examination in Labor , Uterine Cervical Length From Related Chapters II. Technique Mnemonic: 5C's Clean (Sterile technique) Catheterize or empty before examination Cervical evaluation (See ) Cervical Dilation Cervical Effacement Caput forming? Cord Indicated by pulsations behind membranes III. Evaluation: (Mnemonic 5P's) Presentation See Position See Place (Station) See See Puncture (Assess for ) IV. Interpretation: Cervical Length based

2018 FP Notebook

2. Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of cervical dilatation and its value in detecting active labor (Full text)

Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of cervical dilatation and its value in detecting active labor We aimed to examine the agreement between ultrasound and digital vaginal examination in assessing cervical dilatation in an African population and to assess the value of ultrasound in detecting active labor.A cross-sectional study was conducted in a teaching hospital in Ghana between April and September of 2016. Anterior-posterior and transverse diameters of cervical dilatation were measured (...) - 2.01 to 1.95 cm. Ultrasound predicted active labor with 0.87 (95% CI 0.75-0.99) as the area under the ROC curve.Ultrasound measurements showed good agreement with digital vaginal examinations in assessing cervical dilatation during labor and ultrasound may be used to detect active labor.

2018 Journal of ultrasound PubMed

3. Comparative Evaluation of Arabin Pessary and Cervical Cerclage for the Prevention of Preterm Labor in Asymptomatic Women with High Risk Factors (Full text)

of this study was to examine cervical findings for the prediction and the comparative use of Arabin pessary or cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in asymptomatic women with high risk factors for preterm labor.The study group was composed of singleton pregnancies (spontaneously conceived) with high risk factors for preterm labor. Cervical length, dilatation of the internal cervical os and funneling, were estimated with transvaginal ultrasound during the first and the second trimesters (...) Comparative Evaluation of Arabin Pessary and Cervical Cerclage for the Prevention of Preterm Labor in Asymptomatic Women with High Risk Factors Preterm labor is one of the most significant obstetric problems associated with high rate of actual and long-term perinatal complications. Despite the creation of scoring systems, uterine activity monitoring, cervical ultrasound and several biochemical markers, the prediction and prevention of preterm labor is still a matter of concern. The aim

2018 International journal of environmental research and public health PubMed

4. Devices for Measuring Cervical Dilation During Labor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (PubMed)

Devices for Measuring Cervical Dilation During Labor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Measurement of cervical dilation is one of the major indicators of labor progression. At present, the criterion standard for this evaluation is digital examination, which results are sometimes inaccurate and extremely dependent on the subject (ie, obstetrician or midwife) experience.In this systematic and meta-analysis review, the authors have gathered the vast majority of the instruments used (...) for measuring cervical dilation and their clinical application; main features, potentialities, and the most significant constraints are underlined for each device.Three of the most popular databases (ie, Web of Science, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were used to identify all available cervimeters, by using single or combinations of the following keywords: "cervical," "dilation or dilatation," "cervimetry," "cervix," "uterine," "measurement," "labour or labor," "birth," and "monitoring." Only articles

2018 Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey

5. Cervical Length and Bishop Score in Preinduction Cervical Assessment Prior to Induction of Labor

of Medicine related topics: Groups and Cohorts Go to Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment Induction of labor 200 women all are primigravida between 37-42 weeks gestation to whom induction of labor will be carried out in the casualty of Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital. All participants will have an assessment of the cervix by both Bishop score system and transvaginal measurement of cervical length. Other: Bishop score calculation of modified Bishop score in numbers by digital vaginal examination (...) Other: cervical length measuring cervical length by trans-vaginal ultrasound Outcome Measures Go to Primary Outcome Measures : Cervical Length Prior to Labor Induction [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] median cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound in centimetres Bishop Score Prior to Induction of Labor [ Time Frame: 72 hours ] median Bishop score assessed by digital vaginal examination as follows: Cervical dilatation in centimeters will be given a score of zero if closed, a score of 1 if 1-2 cm

2016 Clinical Trials

6. Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth

difference that exceeded the effect of amniotomy with oxytocin (mean difference, 21.11 hours). Women in upright positions also were less likely to have a cesarean delivery (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54–0.94) (43). A second Cochrane meta-analysis of RCTs that examined the effect of position during the second stage of labor found that upright or lateral positions compared with supine positions are associated with fewer “abnormal” fetal heartratepatterns(RR,0.46;95%CI,0.22–0.93),areduc- tion in episiotomies (RR (...) , Blanchard MH, Mercer BM. Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spon- taneous labor. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:77–9. 3. Neal JL, Lamp JM, Buck JS, Lowe NK, Gillespie SL, Ryan SL. Outcomes of nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset admitted to hospitals in preactive versus active labor. J Midwifery Womens Health 2014;59:28–34. 4. Wood AM, Frey HA, Tuuli MG, Caughey AB, Odibo AO, Macones GA, et al. Optimal admission cervical dilation in spontaneously laboring women. Am J

2019 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

7. SMFM Statement: Elective induction of labor in low-risk nulliparous women at term: The ARRIVE trial

nulliparous women, reduces the risk of a composite outcome ofperinataldeathor severeneonatalmorbidity. Nulliparouswomenwithreliabledatingandnoobstetricor medical complications were eligible, regardless of favor- ability of cervical examination. Of the 22,533 women who were eligible for participation, 27% (n¼6106) enrolled. Recruitment occurred at 41 academic and community- based hospitals, with 3062 women randomly assigned to the IOL group and 3044 women randomly assigned to the expectant treatment group (...) SMFM Statement: Elective induction of labor in low-risk nulliparous women at term: The ARRIVE trial SMFMStatementonElectiveInductionof LaborinLow-RiskNulliparousWomenatTerm: theARRIVETrial Society of Maternal-Fetal (SMFM) Publications Committee ARandomizedTrialofInductionVersusExpectantManagement(ARRIVE)wasconductedbytheEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network from March 2014 to August 2017.This large multicenter

2019 Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine

8. Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor. (Full text)

Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor. To compare 2D transperineal ultrasound assessment of cervical dilatation with vaginal examination and to investigate intra-observer variability of the ultrasound method.A prospective observational study was performed at Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden between October 2013 and June 2014. Women with one fetus in cephalic presentation at term had the cervical dilatation (...) assessed with ultrasound and digital vaginal examinations during labor. Inter-method agreement between ultrasound and digital examinations and intra-observer repeatability of ultrasound examinations were tested.Cervical dilatation was successfully assessed with ultrasound in 61/86 (71 %) women. The mean difference between cervical dilatation and ultrasound measurement was 0.9 cm (95 % CI 0.47-1.34). Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.83 (95 % CI 0.72-0.90). Intra-observer repeatability

2015 BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth PubMed

9. Effectiveness of Labor Cervical Examination Simulation in Medical Student Education. (PubMed)

Effectiveness of Labor Cervical Examination Simulation in Medical Student Education. To estimate whether simulation training improves medical students' cervical examination accuracy.The training paradigm for the labor cervical examination exposes patients to additional examinations, lacks a gold standard, and does not objectively assess trainee competence. To address these issues and optimize training, we assessed the effectiveness of cervical examination simulation in third-year medical (...) . On average, competence was achieved with 27-44 repetitions.Simulation training dramatically improved student accuracy in labor cervical examinations. Because not all students achieved competence, the cumulative summation analyses suggest that more than 100 repetitions would be needed if the goal was for the entire class of students to achieve competence.II.

2015 Obstetrics and Gynecology

10. Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor. (PubMed)

by the transperineal ultrasonographic parameters, in women achieving vaginal delivery.This was a prospective longitudinal study performed in 315 Chinese women with singleton pregnancy undergoing labor induction at term between December 2016 and December 2017. Paired assessment of cervical dilatation and fetal head station by vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent (para-sagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance) were made serially following (...) the commencement of labor induction until full cervical dilatation. The researchers were blinded to the findings of the clinical team's vaginal examination and vice versa. The repeated measure data were analyzed by mixed effect models to identify the significant factors (age ≥35 years, obesity, parity, methods of labor induction, and epidural anesthesia) affecting the relationship between para-sagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilatation.The total

2019 American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

11. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring Cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor. (PubMed)

way.The objective of the study was to determine the differences in labor progress by the use of serial transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head descent between women having vaginal and Cesarean delivery.This was a prospective longitudinal study performed in 315 women with singleton pregnancy undergoing labor induction at term between December 2016 and December 2017. Paired assessment of cervical dilatation and fetal head station by vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic (...) vaginal examination and ultrasound assessments was 1,198 with a median of three per woman. The median assessment-to-assessment interval was 4.6 hours (interquartile range 4.3-5.1). Women achieving vaginal delivery (n=261) had steeper slopes of para-sagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilatation than those achieving Cesarean delivery (n=54). Objectively, an additional decrease of 5.11° and 1.37° in para-sagittal angle of progression

2019 American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

12. Labor Curve Analysis of Medically Indicated Early Preterm Induction of Labor. (PubMed)

examinations available during labor. Prior cesarean delivery, 5-minute Apgar score less than 5, and arterial cord pH less than 7.0 were exclusions. The course of cervical dilation was modeled using repeated measures analysis, and smoothed curves for nulliparous and parous women were generated separately. Estimates of the median (5th-95th percentile) traverse times between two dilations were computed using interval censored regression. Traverse times (ie, the elapsed time between two given dilation measures (...) Labor Curve Analysis of Medically Indicated Early Preterm Induction of Labor. To analyze the labor curves of nulliparous and multiparous women between 23.0 and 34.0 weeks of gestation who underwent induction of labor and achieved vaginal delivery.This is a retrospective cohort study of all live singletons delivered vaginally after medically indicated induction of labor between 23.0 and 34.0 weeks of gestation from 2011 through 2014 at our institution. We excluded those with one or no cervical

2019 Obstetrics and Gynecology

13. CRACKCast E180 – Labor & Delivery

● Progression ● Bloody show / mucus ● Plug expelled ● Cervical dilation and/or effacement (first stage of labour) When in doubt, ask for obstetric assessment; wait and see; and get fetal/electrical monitoring! 2) Describe the 4 phases of labor Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Latent phase Active phase (cervix >3cm) ● Where we determine what the presenting part is Fully dilated cervix Urge to push Usually lasts < 1 hr Get ready for delivery! Signs of placental separation include the following: the uterus (...) . At this point, reduce the infusion rate to 1 to 2 mL/min. 7) List 8 factors linked to pre-term labor. Describe the management of premature labor in the ED. List 3 tocolytics. Preterm labor is defined as uterine contractions with cervical changes before 37 weeks of gestation. Early maternal signs and symptoms include an increase or change in vaginal discharge, pain resulting from uterine contractions (sometimes perceived as back pain), pelvic pressure, vaginal bleeding, and fluid leak. Box 181.2 – Factors

2018 CandiEM

14. Fever during labor

) • Threatening preterm labor/PPROM B-C Temperature measurement during labor is recommended every 2-4 hours in case of afebrilia, subfebrilia (37.5-38,0°C) and after placement of epidural analgesia D If the woman in labour has a fever or developes fever, the temperature measurement should be repeated as a minimum every hour D In case of intrapartum fever the following actions are recommended: • Assessment by physician, possibly including physical examination in order to find explanation of fever and plan (...) Fever during labor Fever during labor DSOG (Danish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology) Approved on January 2018 by the participants at the yearly obstetric guideline meeting in DSOG Page 2-4: Clinical recommendations in English Page 5-8: Flow charts in English Page 9 – 68: Entire guideline I Danish Clinical Recommendations Summary of the clinical recommendations regarding handling of intrapartum feber Clinical recommendations Strength A-D Temperature should be a rectal measurement B

2018 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology

15. Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor

Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov Hide glossary Glossary Study record managers: refer to the if submitting registration or results information. Search for terms x × Study Record Detail Saved Studies Save this study Warning You have reached the maximum number of saved (...) studies (100). Please remove one or more studies before adding more. Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor (CMVS) The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our for details. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02732522 Recruitment Status : Completed First Posted : April 8, 2016

2016 Clinical Trials

16. Cervical Dilation on Admission in Term Spontaneous Labor and Maternal and Newborn Outcomes. (Full text)

Cervical Dilation on Admission in Term Spontaneous Labor and Maternal and Newborn Outcomes. To examine associations between cervical dilation on admission and maternal and newborn outcomes in term spontaneous labor.This is a retrospective cohort study of 11,368 singleton, term (37-43 6/7 weeks of gestation) spontaneously laboring women delivering in 14 hospitals in Washington State between 2012 and 2014 using chart abstracted data from the Obstetrics Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Women (...) with prior cesarean delivery or ruptured membranes on admission were excluded. Pregnancy history, cervical dilation on admission, and outcomes were analyzed. Associations between early (less than 4 cm cervical dilation) and late (4 cm or greater cervical dilation) admission and outcomes were examined using general linear models with a log-link stratifying by parity. Results were reported as adjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Early admission compared with late admission

2016 Obstetrics and Gynecology PubMed

17. Repeat Measurement of Cervical Length in Women with Threatened Preterm Labor (Full text)

Repeat Measurement of Cervical Length in Women with Threatened Preterm Labor To examine the value of a repeat measurement some days after the first cervical length measurement done at the time of preterm contractions.Retrospective study involving women with singleton pregnancies who presented with preterm contractions at 24 to 33 + 6 weeks of gestation. The cervical length was measured at the time of presentation and some days afterwards.The study population consisted of 17 cases with a preterm (...) length of 10 and 9 mm - the detection rate was 17.6 % with the first cervical length measurement, 47.0 % with the second and 52.9 % if the difference between both measurements was added.Our results indicate that in women with symptoms of preterm labor it is worth to repeat the measurement some days later and to take into account the difference between both measurements.

2016 Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde PubMed

18. Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth

, with recumbent, lateral, or supine positions during the first stage of labor found that upright positions shorten the duration of the first stage of labor by approximately 1 hour and 22 minutes (mean difference, –1.36; 95% CI, –2.22 to –0.51), a mean difference that exceeded the effect of amniotomy with oxytocin (mean difference, –1.11 hours). Women in upright positions also were less likely to have a cesarean delivery (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54–0.94) (43). A second Cochrane meta-analysis of RCTs that examined (...) , Dierker L, Blanchard MH, Mercer BM. Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:77–9. Neal JL, Lamp JM, Buck JS, Lowe NK, Gillespie SL, Ryan SL. Outcomes of nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset admitted to hospitals in preactive versus active labor. J Midwifery Womens Health 2014;59:28–34. Wood AM, Frey HA, Tuuli MG, Caughey AB, Odibo AO, Macones GA, et al. Optimal admission cervical dilation in spontaneously laboring women. Am J

2017 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

19. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis Vaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D CRD summary This review found that Foley balloon (...) not state any implications for research, but noted that the review lacked sufficient power to determine conclusions on uncommon outcomes such as uterine rupture, meconium aspiration syndrome and maternal and neonatal deaths Funding None stated. Bibliographic details Vaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010; 203(5): 418-429

2010 DARE.

20. Immersion in Water During Labor and Delivery

in duration of the first stage of labor (mean difference, –32.4 minutes; 95% CI, –58.7 to –6.13). However, considering each of these effects, it is difficult to know how factors other than immersion, such as the structure of care (including the presence of an obstetrician–gynecologist and other health care providers and timing and frequency of examinations), affected the outcome. Furthermore, there were no differences in the incidence or severity of perineal trauma (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.99–1.35; five (...) during labor or delivery (10). In a subsequent systematic review and meta-analysis, newborn outcomes after second-stage immersion and birth in water were compared with land birth. Data from the 12 included studies (two randomized trials, three prospective and two retrospective cohort, and five case–control studies) showed no neonatal benefits associated with immersion (18). The most recent and largest meta-analysis and systematic review examining this question included 29 studies. Although

2016 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>