How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

8,928 results for

Best Practices by Specialty

by
...
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

41. Using Multi-source Feedback and Other Practice Assessments for Quality Assurance in Nursing

low-quality review) finding it was a valid, reliable and feasible tool to assess clinical practice for physicians, including generalists, specialists and surgeons. However, one systematic review reported finding limited evidence on the effectiveness of multi-source feedback on changes to clinical practice, but noted that the effectiveness may differ based on specialty. Two recent medium-quality reviews and one older low-quality review found that a minimum of six to eight professional assessors (...) evidence that multi-source feedback could improve performance, but found that the effects varied by specialty with family physicians showing greater practice improvements following multi-source feedback compared to surgeons. o Further, the review found that studies where multi-source feedback also included coaching sessions that helped to interpret feedback, identification of weaknesses and the creation of plans to improve performance, were more effective at improving performance than studies including

2019 McMaster Health Forum

42. Clinical practice guideline for evaluation of psychosocial factors influencing recovery from adult orthopaedic trauma

of the guideline prior to dissemination. Some specialty societies (both orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic) ask their evidence-based practice (EBP) committee to provide review of the guideline. The organization is responsible for coordinating the distribution of our materials and consolidating their comments onto one form. The chair of the external EBP committees provides disclosure of their conflicts of interest (COI) and manages the potential conflicts of their members. Again, the AAOS asks for comments (...) of current treatment and may become outdated as new evidence becomes available. This clinical practice guideline will be revised in accordance with new evidence, changing practice, rapidly emerging treatment options, and new technology. This clinical practice guideline will be updated or withdrawn in five years. CPG Dissemination Plans The primary purpose of the present document is to provide interested readers with full documentation of the best available evidence for various procedures associated

2020 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

43. Clinical practice guideline for limb salvage or early amputation

improve treatment selection for patients with severe lower limb trauma based on the current best evidence. The clinical practice guidelines included in this report are based on the results of a formal systematic review of the available literature related to the amputation or limb salvage treatment decision in adult trauma patients that was completed by the AAOS staff using a rigorous, standardized process that was conducted between June 2018 and June 2019. A work group consisting of military (...) the draft of the guideline prior to dissemination. Some specialty societies (both orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic) ask their evidence-based practice (EBP) committee to provide review of the guideline. The organization is responsible for coordinating the distribution of our materials and consolidating their comments onto one form. The chair of the external EBP committees provides disclosure of their conflicts of interest (COI) and manages the potential conflicts of their members. Again, the AAOS asks

2020 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

44. Guidelines For Professional Ultrasound Practice

: section 2) has been compiled by the British Medical Ultrasound Society Professional Standards team and is presented as examples of best practice. They have been included so that departments can use them as a basis to generate their own departmental examination protocols when there are no nationally agreed ones available. There are also sections giving general guidance and advice, including reporting and audit. Hyperlinks have been extensively used to give access to the many relevant documents already (...) Guidelines for Professional Ultrasound Practice. Revision 3, December 2018 Minor amendments, March 2019. 12 CASE do not accredit individual sonographers, they accredit the course. The British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) and Society for Vascular Technology of Great Britain and Ireland (SVT) accredit individual ultrasound practitioners working within their respective specialties. http://www.bsecho.org/home/ http://www.svtgbi.org.uk/ The Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR) can provide

2019 British Medical Ultrasound Society

45. Consensus Practice Guidelines on Interventions for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain

Consensus Practice Guidelines on Interventions for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain 1 Cohen SP , et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020;0:1–44. doi:10.1136/rapm-2019-101243 Special article Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group Steven P Cohen , 1 Arun Bhaskar, 2 Anuj Bhatia, 3 Asokumar Buvanendran, 4 Tim Deer, 5 Shuchita Garg, 6 W Michael Hooten , 7 Robert W Hurley, 8 David J Kennedy, 9 Brian C McLean, 10 Jee Youn Moon, 11 (...) be applied to clinical practice and clinical trials and the evidence for repeating RFA (see table 12 for summary). Conclusions Lumbar medial branch RFA may provide benefit to well- selected individuals, with MBB being more predictive than IA injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of more false- negatives. Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal

2020 American Academy of Pain Medicine

46. Safe Cholecystectomy Multi-Society Practice Guideline and State of the Art Consensus Conference on Prevention of Bile Duct Injury during Cholecystectomy

Safe Cholecystectomy Multi-Society Practice Guideline and State of the Art Consensus Conference on Prevention of Bile Duct Injury during Cholecystectomy Safe Cholecystectomy Multi-Society Practice Guideline and State of the Art Consensus Conference on Prevention of Bile Duct Injury during Cholecystectomy - A SAGES Publication Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world Safe Cholecystectomy Multi-Society Practice Guideline and State of the Art Consensus Conference on Prevention of Bile Duct (...) undergoing cholecystectomy. Keywords: Cholecystectomy; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; bile duct injury; gallstones; patient safety 1. BACKGROUND Cholecystectomy is the most common operation performed worldwide by general surgeons with between 750,000 – 1,000,000 performed in the U.S. annually. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was introduced into clinical practice approximately 30 years ago, and it quickly became the gold standard operation for patients with symptomatic gallstones. 1 Because the benefits

2020 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons

47. Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access 2020: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access

Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access 2020: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access 2020:An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access* | Anesthesiology | ASA Publications 68182499 ASA Publications Log in to access full content You must be logged in to access this feature. ASA members enjoy complimentary access to ASA publications (...) , as well as a variety of educational resources. Non-ASA Members Login Free Practice Parameter | January 2020 Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access 2020: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access * Author Notes Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are available in both the HTML and PDF versions of this article. Links to the digital files are provided in the HTML

2020 American Society of Anesthesiologists

48. Consensus Practice Guidelines on Interventions for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain from a Multispecialty, International Working Group Full Text available with Trip Pro

Consensus Practice Guidelines on Interventions for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain from a Multispecialty, International Working Group Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group | Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine Log in via your Society Log in using your username and password For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts Username * Password * your user name or password? Search for this keyword Search (...) for this keyword Main menu Log in via your Society Log in using your username and password For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts Username * Password * your user name or password? You are here Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group Article Text Special article Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group Steven P Cohen

2020 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

49. Covid-19 Guidance for Return to Practice for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: Part One

There are two main documents that will be released. This first document contains general considerations for practice that apply across the specialty. A second forthcoming document will contain subspecialty specific recommendations. These documents were prepared by the Future of Otolaryngology Task Force of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) with input from the AAO-HNS Board of Directors, the Infectious Disease Committee, and Patient Safety and Quality Improvement (...) Committee. The AAO-HNS approached the specialty societies within otolaryngology to set up a collaborative process to produce guidance for otolaryngologists that would be consistent, practical, and implementable at the appropriate time, based on local conditions and regulatory guidance. The American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy (AAOA), American Broncho-Esophagological Association (ABEA), American Laryngological Association (ALA), American Neurotology Society (ANS), American Otological Society (AOS

2020 American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

50. Recommendations for improving the patient experience in specialty encounters. (Abstract)

/standards," "physician-patient relations," "surgery," "practice management," "practice management, medical," "office management," "patient experience," "practice guidelines," "best practice," and "outpatient surgery." During this review, three main themes affecting the patient experience emerged: communication, time, and access. Of the three, communication appears to be the dominant theme affecting the patient experience measure.Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published (...) Recommendations for improving the patient experience in specialty encounters. The relationship between patient experience and health care quality has generated significant interest in the patient experience measure. However, it is challenging to find information on how to improve one's patient experience score because scientific data on this topic are weak or lacking, and suggestions provided by scoring vendors are often overgeneralized and not specialty-specific. This review will focus

2018 Journal of American Academy of Dermatology

51. Multi-specialty knowledge on surgical a management: Implementation of an educational initiative. (Abstract)

Medicine (IM), and Family Medicine (FM). Before the lecture, a 12-question quiz on surgical airway knowledge was administered, and demographics from participants collected. Immediately following the lecture, participants were asked to retake the quiz. Performance was assessed. Population baseline characteristics included, specialty, years of practice, and previous education.A paired t-test evaluating pre- and post-lecture results showed a 34.2% improvement for all participants (n = 168) overall (2.7 (...) performed the best. A Likert scale with self-assessment of comfort with surgical airway correlated positively with the performance on the quiz.Variability in tracheostomy knowledge based on specialty and years of training exists. We demonstrate that formal education on tracheostomy and surgical airways improved quantitative measures of knowledge.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

2018 American Journal of Otolaryngology

52. Use of licensed medicines for unlicensed applications in psychiatric practice (2nd edition)

Use of licensed medicines for unlicensed applications in psychiatric practice (2nd edition) Use of licensed medicines for unlicensed applications in psychiatric practice (2nd edition) (CR210 Dec 2017) This site uses cookies: Search Search Become a psychiatrist Choose psychiatry Medical students Foundation doctors Help us promote psychiatry Training Curricula and guidance Your training Exams Neuroscience in training International Medical Graduates Members Supporting you Submitting your CPD (...) Membership Your Faculties Devolved Nations English Divisions International members Special Interest Groups Your monthly eNewsletter Specialty doctors President's lectures Events Conferences and training events In house training International Congress Improving care CCQI Campaigning for better mental health policy Planning the psychiatric workforce National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Working sustainably Mental health Problems and disorders Support, care and treatment Translations Use

2018 Royal College of Psychiatrists

53. Guidelines For Professional Ultrasound Practice

should be performed and are based on best available evidence. They help ultrasound practitioners in their work but they do not replace their knowledge and skills’. Protocol: An agreement, preferably based on research, between practitioners to ensure the delivery of high quality standardised ultrasound examinations. The title of this 2015 edition ‘Guidelines for Professional Ultrasound Practice’ reflects the above definitions. These Guidelines, which are not prescriptive, are made available to be used (...) as recommendations for good practice. Since the first publication of the UKAS ‘Guidelines for Professional Working Practice' in 1993, service provision, technology and patient expectations in medical ultrasound have been transformed. The examination- specific section, including guidelines and common clinical scenarios (ref: section 2) has been compiled by the British Medical Ultrasound Society Professional Standards team and is presented as examples of best practice. SCoR/BMUS Guidelines for Professional

2018 British Medical Ultrasound Society

54. Clinical Guidelines and Standardization of Practice to Improve Outcomes

(13). For example, the College, in collaboration with other specialty societies, has strongly cautioned against legisla- tive intrusion into clinical decision making (14). The motivation and intent for any protocol or checklist shouldbetoensure high quality,safeand, whenpossible, evidence-based practice. Although not driven by eco- nomics, standardization often will result in significant economic savings. When standardized care is used, qual- ity increases, variation decreases, and cost decreases (...) Clinical Guidelines and Standardization of Practice to Improve Outcomes INTERIM UPDATE ACOGCOMMITTEEOPINION Number 792 (Replaces Committee Opinion Number 629, April 2015) Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement INTERIM UPDATE: This Committee Opinion has been updated to reflect content oversight by the Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. Clinical Guidelines and Standardization of Practice to Improve Outcomes ABSTRACT: Protocols and checklists have been shown

2019 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

55. Executive Summary: Criteria for Critical Care of Infants and Children: PICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Practice Statement and Levels of Care Guidance

Executive Summary: Criteria for Critical Care of Infants and Children: PICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Practice Statement and Levels of Care Guidance Executive Summary: Criteria for Critical Care of Infants and Children: PICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Practice Statement and Levels of Care Guidance | From the American Academy of Pediatrics | Pediatrics '); document.write(''); } function OAS_AD(pos) { if (OAS_version >= 11 && typeof(OAS_RICH)!='undefined') { OAS_RICH(pos); } else (...) { OAS_NORMAL(pos); } } //--> Search for this keyword Source User menu Sections Sign up for highlighting editor-chosen studies with the greatest impact on clinical care. Executive Summary: Criteria for Critical Care of Infants and Children: PICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Practice Statement and Levels of Care Guidance Benson S. Hsu , Vanessa Hill , Lorry R. Frankel , Timothy S. Yeh , Shari Simone , Marjorie J. Arca , Jorge A. Coss-Bu , Mary E. Fallat , Jason Foland , Samir Gadepalli , Michael O. Gayle

2019 American Academy of Pediatrics

56. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for the Medical Management of Pediatric Luminal Crohn’s Disease

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for the Medical Management of Pediatric Luminal Crohn’s Disease e35 © The Author(s) 2019. This article is being published jointly in the Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the AGA Institute This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (...) (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Original article Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for the Medical Management of Pediatric Luminal Crohn’s Disease David R. Mack 1,2,3 , Eric I. Benchimol 1,2,3,4 , Jeff Critch 3,5 , Jennifer deBruyn 3,6 , Frances T se 7 , Paul Moayyedi 7 , Peter Church 3,8 , Colette Deslandres 3,9 , Wael

2019 Canadian Association of Gastroenterology

57. ACR–ASNR–SCBT-MR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Adult Spine

are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care 1 . For these reasons and those set forth below, the American College of Radiology and our collaborating medical specialty societies caution against the use of these documents in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made (...) standard of care. See also, Stanley v. McCarver, 63 P.3d 1076 (Ariz. App. 2003) where in a concurring opinion the Court stated that “published standards or guidelines of specialty medical organizations are useful in determining the duty owed or the standard of care applicable in a given situation” even though ACR standards themselves do not establish the standard of care. PRACTICE PARAMETER 2 MRI Adult Spine I. INTRODUCTION This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College

2019 American Society of Neuroradiology

58. ACR–ASNR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Computed Tomography (CT) Perfusion in Neuroradiologic Imaging Revised

and Technical Standards are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care 1 . For these reasons and those set forth below, the American College of Radiology and our collaborating medical specialty societies caution against the use of these documents in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course (...) are educational tools and not intended to establish a legal standard of care. See also, Stanley v. McCarver, 63 P.3d 1076 (Ariz. App. 2003) where in a concurring opinion the Court stated that “published standards or guidelines of specialty medical organizations are useful in determining the duty owed or the standard of care applicable in a given situation” even though ACR standards themselves do not establish the standard of care. CT Perfusion PRACTICE PARAMETER This practice parameter was revised

2019 American Society of Neuroradiology

59. ACR–ASNR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Myelography and Cisternography

ACR–ASNR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Myelography and Cisternography PRACTICE PARAMETER Myelography / 1 Revised 2013 (Resolution 9)* ACR–ASNR–SPR PRACTICE PARAMETER FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF MYELOGRAPHY AND CISTERNOGRAPHY PREAMBLE This document is an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate radiologic care for patients. Practice Parameters and Technical Standards are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should (...) they be used, to establish a legal standard of care 1 . For these reasons and those set forth below, the American College of Radiology and our collaborating medical specialty societies caution against the use of these documents in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the practitioner in light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, an approach

2019 American Society of Neuroradiology

60. ACR–ASNR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Head and Neck

are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care 1 . For these reasons and those set forth below, the American College of Radiology and our collaborating medical specialty societies caution against the use of these documents in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made (...) standard of care. See also, Stanley v. McCarver, 63 P.3d 1076 (Ariz. App. 2003) where in a concurring opinion the Court stated that “published standards or guidelines of specialty medical organizations are useful in determining the duty owed or the standard of care applicable in a given situation” even though ACR standards themselves do not establish the standard of care. PRACTICE PARAMETER 2 MRI Head and Neck I. INTRODUCTION This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College

2019 American Society of Neuroradiology

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>