How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

104,377 results for

("systematic review" OR "systematic reviews") AND (standards OR definition OR defined OR guidelines OR "organization of a systematic" OR "contents or a systematic" OR "format of a systematic")

by
...
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

1. Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines July to December 2018

Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines July to December 2018 1 PET Six-Month Monitoring Report 2018-2 Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines July to December 2018 R. Poon and the Program in Evidence-Based Care Disease Site Group Reviewers Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Report Date: July 9, 2019 QUESTION What is the role (...) , brief summary of the identified evidence, and not a detailed evaluation of its quality and relevance. 2 METHODS Literature Search Strategy Full-text articles published between July and December 2018 were systematically searched through MEDLINE and EMBASE for evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews. The search strategies used are available upon request to the PEBC. Inclusion Criteria for Clinical Practice Guidelines Any clinical practice guidelines that contained recommendations

2019 Cancer Care Ontario

2. Red blood cell specifications for patients with hemoglobinopathies: a systematic review and guideline (ICTM Collaboration) Full Text available with Trip Pro

for transfusion support in sickle cell disease . Blood , 132 , 1198 – 1207 . Compernolle, V. , Chou, S.T. , Tanael, S. , Savage, W. , Howard, J. , Josephson, C.D. , Odame, I. , Hogan, C. , Denomme, G. & Shehata, N. ( 2018 ) Red blood cell specifications for patients with hemoglobinopathies: a systematic review and guideline . Transfusion , 58 , 1555 – 1566 . Davis, B.A. , Allard, S. , Qureshi, A. , Porter, J.B. , Pancham, S. , Win, N. , Cho, G. , Ryan, K. ; British Committee for Standards in Haematology (...) Red blood cell specifications for patients with hemoglobinopathies: a systematic review and guideline (ICTM Collaboration) Position paper on International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine (ICTM) Guideline ‘Red blood cell specifications for patients with hemoglobinopathies: a systematic review and guideline’ - Trompeter - - British Journal of Haematology - Wiley Online Library By continuing to browse this site, you agree to its use of cookies as described in our . Search within Search term

2020 British Committee for Standards in Haematology

3. Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines: January to June 2019

Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines: January to June 2019 1 PET Six-Month Monitoring Report 2019-1 Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines January to June 2019 R. Poon and the Program in Evidence-Based Care Disease Site Group Reviewers Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Report Date: November 25, 2019 QUESTION What is the role (...) , brief summary of the identified evidence, and not a detailed evaluation of its quality and relevance. 2 METHODS Literature Search Strategy Full-text articles published between January and June 2019 were systematically searched through MEDLINE and EMBASE for evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews. The search strategies used are available upon request to the PEBC. Inclusion Criteria for Clinical Practice Guidelines Any clinical practice guidelines that contained recommendations

2019 Cancer Care Ontario

4. Opening the black box of standard of care and finding a black hole: a systematic review on the RCTs' control groups defined as "standard of care" in stroke rehabilitation

Opening the black box of standard of care and finding a black hole: a systematic review on the RCTs' control groups defined as "standard of care" in stroke rehabilitation Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (...) outcome(s) Example: 1st author, year of publication, language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean

2019 PROSPERO

5. PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines

PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines 1 PET Six-Month Monitoring Report 2017-2 Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines July to December 2017 R. Poon and the Program in Evidence-Based Care Disease Site Group Reviewers Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Report Date: May 1, 2018 QUESTION What is the role of positron emission (...) evidence, and not a detailed evaluation of its quality and relevance. 2 METHODS Literature Search Strategy Full-text articles published between July and December 2017 were systematically searched through MEDLINE and EMBASE for evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews. The search strategies used are available upon request to the PEBC. Inclusion Criteria for Clinical Practice Guidelines Any clinical practice guidelines that contained recommendations with respect to PET were included. Study

2018 Cancer Care Ontario

6. PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines

PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines 1 PET Six-Month Monitoring Report 2018-1 Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines January to June 2018 R. Poon and the Program in Evidence-Based Care Disease Site Group Reviewers Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Report Date: October 22, 2018 QUESTION What is the role of positron emission (...) of the identified evidence, and not a detailed evaluation of its quality and relevance. 2 METHODS Literature Search Strategy Full-text articles published between January and June 2018 were systematically searched through MEDLINE and EMBASE for evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews. The search strategies used are available upon request to the PEBC. Inclusion Criteria for Clinical Practice Guidelines Any clinical practice guidelines that contained recommendations with respect to PET were included

2018 Cancer Care Ontario

7. PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines

PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines 1 PET Six-Month Monitoring Report 2017-1 Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines January to June 2017 R. Poon and the Program in Evidence-Based Care Disease Site Group Reviewers Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Report Date: December 18, 2017 QUESTION What is the role of positron emission (...) of the identified evidence, and not a detailed evaluation of its quality and relevance. 2 METHODS Literature Search Strategy Full-text articles published between January and June 2017 were systematically searched through MEDLINE and EMBASE for evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews. The search strategies used are available upon request to the PEBC. Inclusion Criteria for Clinical Practice Guidelines Any clinical practice guidelines that contained recommendations with respect to PET were included

2018 Cancer Care Ontario

8. The immune phenotype for defining the spontaneous operational tolerance phenomenon after solid organ transplantation: a systematic review

The immune phenotype for defining the spontaneous operational tolerance phenomenon after solid organ transplantation: a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne (...) of publication, language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A meta‐analysis will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If meta‐analysis is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio

2018 PROSPERO

9. Do evidence summaries increase health policy?makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review Full Text available with Trip Pro

examining any type of “friendly front end”, “evidence summary”, or “policy brief” or other product derived from systematic reviews or guidelines based on systematic reviews that presents evidence in a summarized form to policy‐makers and health system managers. Interventions had to include a summary of a systematic review and be actively “pushed” to target users. This means that the summary had to be disseminated or shown to the study participants via email, mail or other means. We included any (...) comparisons including active comparators (e.g. other summary formats) or no intervention. Types of outcome measures Primary Outcomes 1. Use of systematic review derivative product in decision‐making (e.g. self‐reported use of the evidence in policy‐making, decision‐making as well as self‐reported access of research, appraisal of research, or commissioning of further research within the decision‐making process ( ). We defined “use” as instrumental, conceptual, or symbolic use of research in decision‐making

2018 Campbell Collaboration

10. Reducing HIV-related stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings: a systematic review of guidelines, tools, standards of practice, best practices, consensus statements and systematic reviews Full Text available with Trip Pro

Reducing HIV-related stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings: a systematic review of guidelines, tools, standards of practice, best practices, consensus statements and systematic reviews Policy makers and health professionals prefer to use preappraised and summarized evidence. Stigma and discrimination (SAD) reduction activities and programs are needed to improve the quality of care delivered to people living with HIV and the success of HIV-related prevention, care and treatment (...) programs. The objective of this review was to identify and describe systematic reviews, best practices, consensus statements, standards of practice and guidelines that addressed SAD among healthcare workers (HCWs).All documents in the form of systematic reviews, best practices, consensus statements, standards of practice and guidelines were considered for inclusion. The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies reported in English with unlimited date range in Excerpta Medica

2018 Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare

11. Improving Access to and Usability of Systematic Review Data for Health Systems Guidelines Development

Improving Access to and Usability of Systematic Review Data for Health Systems Guidelines Development Methods Research Report Improving Access to and Usability of Systematic Review Data for Health Systems Guidelines Development Methods Research Report Improving Access to and Usability of Systematic Review Data for Health Systems Guidelines Development Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 (...) , such as clinical practice guidelines, other quality enhancement tools, or reimbursement or coverage policies may not be stated or implied. Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this report. For assistance contact EffectiveHealthCare@ahrq.hhs.gov. Suggested citation: Totten AM, Smith C, Dunham K, Jungbauer RM, Graham E. Improving Access to and Usability of Systematic Review Data for Health Systems Guidelines Development. Methods Research Report. (Prepared

2019 Effective Health Care Program (AHRQ)

12. The use of automation in systematic reviews, guideline development and guideline surveillance: a systematic review

The use of automation in systematic reviews, guideline development and guideline surveillance: a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated (...) is planned , please specify the following:"> Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model is the typical model of choice for pre-clinical meta-analyses. This is because in the fixed-effect model, it is assumed that the differences in observed effect between studies is solely due to sampling error (i.e. differences in sample size), and that the true effect is the same (fixed) across all studies. However

2019 PROSPERO

13. Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain: A Systematic Review of Existing Guidelines and Policy Statement Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists

Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain: A Systematic Review of Existing Guidelines and Policy Statement Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Formation image de r esonance magn etique Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain: A Systematic Review of Existing Guidelines and Policy Statement Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists Andreu F. Costa, MD, MSc, FRCPC a,y , Christian B. van der Pol, MD, FRCPC b,y , Pejman Jabehdar Maralani, MD, FRCPC c (...) )toreviewtheevidencefromanimalandhumanstudies;2)to systematically review existing guidelines and position statements issued by other organizations and health agencies; and 3) to formulate an evidence-based position statement on behalf of the Canadian Association of Radiologists. Based on our appraisal of the evidence and systematic review of 9 guidelines issued by other organizations, the working group established the following consensus statement. GBCA administration should be considered carefully with respect to potential risks and bene

2018 Canadian Association of Radiologists

14. A systematic review of dementia detection, diagnosis and management guideline recommendations for the protected characteristics of people as defined by the UK Equality Act 2010

A systematic review of dementia detection, diagnosis and management guideline recommendations for the protected characteristics of people as defined by the UK Equality Act 2010 Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability (...) will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach If a meta-analysis is planned , please specify the following:"> Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model is the typical model of choice for pre-clinical meta-analyses. This is because in the fixed-effect model, it is assumed that the differences in observed effect between studies is solely due to sampling error (i.e. differences in sample size

2019 PROSPERO

15. Practice Guideline Update Systematic Review Summary: Disorders of Consciousness

Practice Guideline Update Systematic Review Summary: Disorders of Consciousness 1 Practice guideline update: Disorders of consciousness Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Joseph T. Giacino, PhD 1 ; Douglas I. Katz, MD 2 ; Nicholas D. Schiff, MD 3 ; John Whyte, MD, PhD 4 (...) diagnostic assessment procedures that incorporate the Aspen Neurobehavioral Workgroup criteria accurately detect behavioral signs of consciousness or differentiate specific DoCs (VS/UWS, MCS, and posttraumatic confusional state [PTCS]) compared with consensus-based diagnostic opinion or standardized behavioral assessment. Readers are referred to a previously published systematic review completed by the ACRM Disorders of Consciousness Task Force that provides evidence-based recommendations for clinical

2018 American Academy of Neurology

16. Effect of Dysphagia Screening Strategies on Clinical Outcomes After Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Full Text available with Trip Pro

protocols or quality improvement interven- tions to standardize or increase dysphagia screening rates. Review methods adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards 9 with the rec- ommendations of the “ACCF/AHA Clinical Practice Guideline Methodology Summit Report.” 10 Studies were considered eli- gible if they reported a randomized comparison of =2 dysphagia screening strategies, including quality improvement interven- tions designed to improve dysphagia (...) Effect of Dysphagia Screening Strategies on Clinical Outcomes After Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke e123 The American Heart Association makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required

2018 American Heart Association

17. Accuracy of Prediction Instruments for Diagnosing Large Vessel Occlusion in Individuals With Suspected Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards and the recommendations of the “ACCF/AHA Clinical Practice Guideline Methodology Summit Report.” Search Strategy Medline (via PubMed/OVID), Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Central Database of Controlled Trials (via CENTRAL) were searched on October 27, 2016, with the use of free text, medical subject headings, and synonyms for stroke screening, severity scales, and LVO. The fully specified search strategy is provided in Table I of the . References (...) Accuracy of Prediction Instruments for Diagnosing Large Vessel Occlusion in Individuals With Suspected Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Accuracy of Prediction Instruments for Diagnosing Large Vessel Occlusion in Individuals With Suspected Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke | Stroke Search Hello Guest! Login to your account Email

2018 American Heart Association

18. The development of a narrative describing the bereavement of families of potential organ donors: A systematic review. Full Text available with Trip Pro

The development of a narrative describing the bereavement of families of potential organ donors: A systematic review. Families of potential post-mortem organ donors face various challenges in the unfamiliar hospital context and after returning home. This review of sources published between 1968 and 2017 seeks to understand their journey as a bereavement experience with a number of unique features. Grief theory was used to identify ways that staff can assist family members to tolerate

2018 Health psychology open

19. Detection rates of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease using dye-based chromoendoscopy compared with standard- and high-definition white-light colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Detection rates of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease using dye-based chromoendoscopy compared with standard- and high-definition white-light colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients with ulcerative colitis have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. We sought to assess the comparative efficacy of standard white-light endoscopy (SDWLE) or high-definition white-light endoscopy (HDWLE) versus dye-based chromoendoscopy through a meta-analysis and rating (...) the quality of evidence using the GRADE system.A systematic review of the literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Sciences was performed through April 2018. Primary outcome was number of patients in whom dysplasia was identified using a per-patient analysis in randomized controlled trial (RCT) and also analyzed separately for non-RCT. Analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 reporting random-effects risk ratios.Of the 27,904 studies identified 10 studies were included 6 of which were RCT (3 SDWLE and 3

2019 Gastrointestinal endoscopy

20. Organisational and service specification recommendations for centres providing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI): a systematic review of guidelines, recommendations and standards

Organisational and service specification recommendations for centres providing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI): a systematic review of guidelines, recommendations and standards Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility (...) will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach If a meta-analysis is planned , please specify the following:"> Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model is the typical model of choice for pre-clinical meta-analyses. This is because in the fixed-effect model, it is assumed that the differences in observed effect between studies is solely due to sampling error (i.e. differences in sample size

2019 PROSPERO

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>