How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

92,628 results for

("systematic review" OR "systematic reviews") AND (standards OR definition OR defined OR guidelines OR "organization of a systematic" OR "contents or a systematic" OR "format of a systematic")

by
...
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

1. Reducing HIV-related stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings: a systematic review of guidelines, tools, standards of practice, best practices, consensus statements and systematic reviews (PubMed)

Reducing HIV-related stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings: a systematic review of guidelines, tools, standards of practice, best practices, consensus statements and systematic reviews Policy makers and health professionals prefer to use preappraised and summarized evidence. Stigma and discrimination (SAD) reduction activities and programs are needed to improve the quality of care delivered to people living with HIV and the success of HIV-related prevention, care and treatment (...) programs. The objective of this review was to identify and describe systematic reviews, best practices, consensus statements, standards of practice and guidelines that addressed SAD among healthcare workers (HCWs).All documents in the form of systematic reviews, best practices, consensus statements, standards of practice and guidelines were considered for inclusion. The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies reported in English with unlimited date range in Excerpta Medica

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare

2. PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines

PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines 1 PET Six-Month Monitoring Report 2017-1 Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines January to June 2017 R. Poon and the Program in Evidence-Based Care Disease Site Group Reviewers Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Report Date: December 18, 2017 QUESTION What is the role of positron emission (...) of the identified evidence, and not a detailed evaluation of its quality and relevance. 2 METHODS Literature Search Strategy Full-text articles published between January and June 2017 were systematically searched through MEDLINE and EMBASE for evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews. The search strategies used are available upon request to the PEBC. Inclusion Criteria for Clinical Practice Guidelines Any clinical practice guidelines that contained recommendations with respect to PET were included

2018 Cancer Care Ontario

3. PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines

PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines 1 PET Six-Month Monitoring Report 2018-1 Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines January to June 2018 R. Poon and the Program in Evidence-Based Care Disease Site Group Reviewers Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Report Date: October 22, 2018 QUESTION What is the role of positron emission (...) of the identified evidence, and not a detailed evaluation of its quality and relevance. 2 METHODS Literature Search Strategy Full-text articles published between January and June 2018 were systematically searched through MEDLINE and EMBASE for evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews. The search strategies used are available upon request to the PEBC. Inclusion Criteria for Clinical Practice Guidelines Any clinical practice guidelines that contained recommendations with respect to PET were included

2018 Cancer Care Ontario

4. PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines

PET Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines 1 PET Six-Month Monitoring Report 2017-2 Evidence from Primary Studies and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines July to December 2017 R. Poon and the Program in Evidence-Based Care Disease Site Group Reviewers Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Report Date: May 1, 2018 QUESTION What is the role of positron emission (...) evidence, and not a detailed evaluation of its quality and relevance. 2 METHODS Literature Search Strategy Full-text articles published between July and December 2017 were systematically searched through MEDLINE and EMBASE for evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews. The search strategies used are available upon request to the PEBC. Inclusion Criteria for Clinical Practice Guidelines Any clinical practice guidelines that contained recommendations with respect to PET were included. Study

2018 Cancer Care Ontario

5. Detection rates of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease using dye-based chromoendoscopy compared with standard- and high-definition white-light colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (PubMed)

Detection rates of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease using dye-based chromoendoscopy compared with standard- and high-definition white-light colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients with ulcerative colitis have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. We sought to assess the comparative efficacy of standard white-light endoscopy (SDWLE) or high-definition white-light endoscopy (HDWLE) versus dye-based chromoendoscopy through a meta-analysis and rating (...) the quality of evidence using the GRADE system.A systematic review of the literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Sciences was performed through April 2018. Primary outcome was number of patients in whom dysplasia was identified using a per-patient analysis in randomized controlled trial (RCT) and also analyzed separately for non-RCT. Analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 reporting random-effects risk ratios.Of the 27,904 studies identified 10 studies were included 6 of which were RCT (3 SDWLE and 3

2019 Gastrointestinal endoscopy

6. Accuracy of Prediction Instruments for Diagnosing Large Vessel Occlusion in Individuals With Suspected Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards and the recommendations of the “ACCF/AHA Clinical Practice Guideline Methodology Summit Report.” Search Strategy Medline (via PubMed/OVID), Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Central Database of Controlled Trials (via CENTRAL) were searched on October 27, 2016, with the use of free text, medical subject headings, and synonyms for stroke screening, severity scales, and LVO. The fully specified search strategy is provided in Table I of the . References (...) Accuracy of Prediction Instruments for Diagnosing Large Vessel Occlusion in Individuals With Suspected Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Accuracy of Prediction Instruments for Diagnosing Large Vessel Occlusion in Individuals With Suspected Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke | Stroke Search Hello Guest! Login to your account Email

2018 American Heart Association

7. Effect of Dysphagia Screening Strategies on Clinical Outcomes After Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

protocols or quality improvement interven- tions to standardize or increase dysphagia screening rates. Review methods adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards 9 with the rec- ommendations of the “ACCF/AHA Clinical Practice Guideline Methodology Summit Report.” 10 Studies were considered eli- gible if they reported a randomized comparison of =2 dysphagia screening strategies, including quality improvement interven- tions designed to improve dysphagia (...) Effect of Dysphagia Screening Strategies on Clinical Outcomes After Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke e123 The American Heart Association makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 American Heart Association

8. Practice Guideline Update Systematic Review Summary: Disorders of Consciousness

Practice Guideline Update Systematic Review Summary: Disorders of Consciousness 1 Practice guideline update: Disorders of consciousness Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Joseph T. Giacino, PhD 1 ; Douglas I. Katz, MD 2 ; Nicholas D. Schiff, MD 3 ; John Whyte, MD, PhD 4 (...) diagnostic assessment procedures that incorporate the Aspen Neurobehavioral Workgroup criteria accurately detect behavioral signs of consciousness or differentiate specific DoCs (VS/UWS, MCS, and posttraumatic confusional state [PTCS]) compared with consensus-based diagnostic opinion or standardized behavioral assessment. Readers are referred to a previously published systematic review completed by the ACRM Disorders of Consciousness Task Force that provides evidence-based recommendations for clinical

2018 American Academy of Neurology

9. The development of a narrative describing the bereavement of families of potential organ donors: A systematic review. (PubMed)

The development of a narrative describing the bereavement of families of potential organ donors: A systematic review. Families of potential post-mortem organ donors face various challenges in the unfamiliar hospital context and after returning home. This review of sources published between 1968 and 2017 seeks to understand their journey as a bereavement experience with a number of unique features. Grief theory was used to identify ways that staff can assist family members to tolerate

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 Health psychology open

10. ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategies: A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group

ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategies: A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategies: A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group | Circulation Search Hello Guest! Login to your account Email Password Keep me logged in Search March 2019 March 2019 March 2019 March 2019 March 2019 February 2019 February 2019 (...) February 2019 February 2019 January 2019 January 2019 January 2019 January 2019 January 2019 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Free Access article Share on Jump to Free Access article ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategies: A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 American Heart Association

11. Pacing as a Treatment for Reflex-Mediated (Vasovagal, Situational, or Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity) Syncope: A Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American Coll

Pacing as a Treatment for Reflex-Mediated (Vasovagal, Situational, or Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity) Syncope: A Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American Coll Pacing as a Treatment for Reflex-Mediated (Vasovagal, Situational, or Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity) Syncope: A Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report (...) Access article Share on Jump to Free Access article Pacing as a Treatment for Reflex-Mediated (Vasovagal, Situational, or Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity) Syncope: A Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society , MD, FACC, FAHA, FHRS, Chair , MD, MS, FACC, FAHA, FHRS , MD, PhD , MD , and MD

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 American Heart Association

12. Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults

Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines | Hypertension (...) Search Hello Guest! Login to your account Email Password Keep me logged in Search April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Free Access article Share on Jump to Free Access article Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 American Heart Association

13. Systematic Review for the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Pract

Systematic Review for the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Pract Systematic Review for the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death | Circulation Search Hello Guest! Login to your account Email Password Keep me logged (...) in Search March 2019 March 2019 March 2019 March 2019 March 2019 February 2019 February 2019 February 2019 February 2019 January 2019 January 2019 January 2019 January 2019 January 2019 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Free Access article Share on Jump to Free Access article Systematic Review for the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death A Report

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 American Heart Association

14. Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association | Circulation Search Hello Guest! Login to your account Email Password Keep me logged in Search March 2019 March 2019 March 2019 March (...) 2019 March 2019 February 2019 February 2019 February 2019 February 2019 January 2019 January 2019 January 2019 January 2019 January 2019 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Free Access article Share on Jump to Free Access article Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , MD, FAHA, Chair , MD, MSc

2017 American Heart Association

15. Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Trimodality Therapy for Resectable Oesophageal Carcinoma: Meta-analyses and Systematic Review of Literature

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Trimodality Therapy for Resectable Oesophageal Carcinoma: Meta-analyses and Systematic Review of Literature Standard therapy for loco-regionally advanced, resectable oesophageal carcinoma is trimodality therapy (TMT) consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and oesophagectomy. Evidence of survival advantage of TMT over organ-preserving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is inconclusive. The aim of this study is to compare survival between TMT and dCRT.A (...) systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies on resectable, curatively treated, oesophageal carcinoma patients above 18 years were included. Three online databases were searched for studies comparing TMT with dCRT. Primary outcomes were 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools for RCTs and cohort studies. Quality of evidence was evaluated according to Grading

2019 EvidenceUpdates

16. In-hospital experiences of families of potential organ donors: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. (PubMed)

In-hospital experiences of families of potential organ donors: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Information and compassion assist families of potential organ donors to make informed decisions. However, psychological implications of the in-hospital process are not well described with past research focusing on decision-making. To enhance understanding and improve service delivery, a systematic review was conducted. Inductive analysis and synthesis utilised Grounded Theory

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 Health psychology open

17. The safety and efficacy of ketoconazole combined with calmodulin inhibitor in solid organ transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The safety and efficacy of ketoconazole combined with calmodulin inhibitor in solid organ transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content (...) a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach If a meta-analysis is planned , please specify the following:"> Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model is the typical model of choice for pre-clinical meta-analyses. This is because in the fixed-effect model, it is assumed that the differences in observed effect between studies is solely due to sampling error (i.e. differences in sample size), and that the true

2019 PROSPERO

18. Lack of Standard Definitions of Primary and Secondary (Non)responders After Primary Gastric Bypass and Gastric Sleeve: a Systematic Review. (PubMed)

Lack of Standard Definitions of Primary and Secondary (Non)responders After Primary Gastric Bypass and Gastric Sleeve: a Systematic Review. Lack of standard definitions of primary and secondary (non)responders after RYGB and SG makes it impossible to compare the literature. The aim was to analyze the different definitions used. MEDLINE® was searched for literature published between 01-07-2014 and 01-07-2017 concerning (1) patients who received a primary RYGB or SG and (2) the outcomes (...) of primary and secondary (non)responders. One hundred twelve out of 650 papers were eligible. Forty out of 47 papers described a definition of weight loss success. Sixty-seven out of 112 papers mentioned weight loss failure of which 42 described a definition, in total 23 different definitions. Weight regain was mentioned in 77 papers; only 21 papers provided a definition. The recent literature regarding definitions of these outcomes is highly inconsistent. To compare the literature international

2018 Obesity Surgery

19. The methodological quality of guideline recommendations on vitamin D and calcium intakes: a systematic review of food-based dietary guidelines and osteoporosis prevention guidelines

The methodological quality of guideline recommendations on vitamin D and calcium intakes: a systematic review of food-based dietary guidelines and osteoporosis prevention guidelines Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility (...) will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach If a meta-analysis is planned , please specify the following:"> Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model is the typical model of choice for pre-clinical meta-analyses. This is because in the fixed-effect model, it is assumed that the differences in observed effect between studies is solely due to sampling error (i.e. differences in sample size

2019 PROSPERO

20. Is there consensus in defining childhood cerebral visual impairment? A systematic review of terminology and definitions. (PubMed)

Is there consensus in defining childhood cerebral visual impairment? A systematic review of terminology and definitions. The childhood condition of visual difficulties caused by brain damage, commonly termed cortical or cerebral visual impairment (CVI), is well established but has no internationally accepted definition. Clarification of its core features is required to advance research and clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to identify the definitions of childhood CVI (...) consensual definition identified here may not be the best quality for advancing our understanding of CVI. We argue for the alternative definition: CVI is a verifiable visual dysfunction which cannot be attributed to disorders of the anterior visual pathways or any potentially co-occurring ocular impairment. We propose reporting guidelines to permit comparison across studies and increase the evidence base for more reliable clinical assessment and diagnosis.© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2017 The British journal of ophthalmology

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>