How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

181,707 results for

"metaanalysis" OR "meta analysis" OR "systematic review"〈=en

by
...
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

161. Agricultural input subsidies for improving productivity, farm income, consumer welfare and wider growth in low? and lower?middle?income countries: a systematic review Full Text available with Trip Pro

and timely topic for systematic review. The literature on implementing subsidies and their impacts in different contexts has previously been reviewed with mixed findings on many outcomes (e.g. ; Fan et al., 2008; ; ; ; ; ). However, to the best of our knowledge, no review of agricultural input subsidies using systematic searching, data collection, critical appraisal and statistical synthesis using metaanalysis, has yet been published. Furthermore, previous literature reviews have not been sufficiently (...) Agricultural input subsidies for improving productivity, farm income, consumer welfare and wider growth in low? and lower?middle?income countries: a systematic review Agricultural input subsidies for improving productivity, farm income, consumer welfare and wider growth in low‐ and lower‐middle‐income countries: a systematic review - Hemming - 2018 - Campbell Systematic Reviews - Wiley Online Library By continuing to browse this site, you agree to its use of cookies as described in our . Search

2018 Campbell Collaboration

162. Reducing unemployment benefit duration to increase job finding rates: a systematic review Full Text available with Trip Pro

with the data available. The unobserved components are typically assumed to follow a discrete distribution with two (or more) points of support. The acceptable outcome measurement frequency for calculating hazard ratios in this review was three months or less. A study reporting only outcomes measured on time intervals of more than three months was not included in the metaanalysis (on secondary outcomes, the study by provided data on the survival probability in re‐employment within 8 months which (...) Germany and three studies used the same sample of data from Austria, i.e. the studies used administrative register data from the same country covering the same time period. We reviewed all studies, but in the metaanalysis we only included one estimate of the effect from each sample of data in order to avoid dependencies between the “observations” (i.e. the estimates of the effect) in the metaanalysis. The choice of which estimates to include was based on our risk of bias assessment of the studies

2018 Campbell Collaboration

163. Police?initiated diversion for youth to prevent future delinquent behavior: a systematic review Full Text available with Trip Pro

in the judicial process may exist ( ). According to a Ministry of Justice study, 18% of youth arrests in England and Wales result in a caution (Ministry of Justice, 2017). In the United States, estimate that a similar number (25%) of youth entering the juvenile justice system are diverted, but much of this is initiated post‐charge, rather than by the police officer during the initial interaction with the youth. Departing from, but building on the work of prior reviews, our systematic review and metaanalysis (...) eligibility criteria. As is often the case, several studies that were initially coded as eligible were later recoded as ineligible upon closer inspection. In the case of the current review, one study met the criterion for being a near‐miss study. This study is listed in the reference section as marginally eligible, but excluded. includes a full list of studies included in and excluded from the metaanalysis. Included studies , , and provide descriptive information on 31 treatment‐comparison contrasts

2018 Campbell Collaboration

164. Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review Full Text available with Trip Pro

in the review, the author had limited resources with which to conduct the review and a metaanalysis was not attempted. Other reviews on adolescent treatment and recovery have compared the effectiveness of different adolescent outpatient treatments ( ; ), reviewed adolescent participation in 12‐Step programs ( ; ) and the role of social support in collegiate recovery programs (Smock, Baker, Harris, & D'Sauza, 2011), and explored the relationship between 12‐Step attendance and adolescent substance use (...) Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review - Hennessy - 2018 - Campbell Systematic Reviews - Wiley Online Library By continuing to browse this site, you agree to its use of cookies as described in our . Search within Search term Search term SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2018 Campbell Collaboration

165. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review Full Text available with Trip Pro

interactions was consistent with expectations ( ). 1.4 WHY IT IS IMPORTANT TO DO THE REVIEW Class size is one of the most researched educational interventions in social science, yet there is no clear consensus on the effectiveness of small class sizes for improving student achievement. While one strand of class size research points to small and insignificant effects of smaller classes, another points to positive and significant effects on student achievement of smaller classes. The early metaanalysis (...) assessment is pertinent when thinking of data synthesis as it operationalizes the identification of studies (especially in relation to non‐randomised studies) with a very high risk of bias. The refinement increases transparency in assessment judgements and provides justification for not including a study with a very high risk of bias in the metaanalysis. Risk of bias judgement items The risk of bias model used in this review is based on nine items (see Appendix 11.5). The nine items refer to: sequence

2018 Campbell Collaboration

166. Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews

are the CONSORT ( Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials ) Statement for parallel group RCTs , and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement for systematic reviews. Evidence is accumulating that shows that the endorsement and use of reporting guidelines in the editorial process, peer review and by authors are associated with more completely reported research. , This article provides an overview of the most widely used reporting guidelines for reporting (...) demonstrated inadequate reporting of blinding and allocation concealment in a total of more than 2000 trials of interventions for schizophrenia. Patel et al performed a systematic review that assessed the completeness of phase 2/3 studies of antipsychotic agents, and found several reporting limitations related to the description of design, indication of hypotheses, documentation of sample size calculation, and description of randomisation and blinding. de Vries et al performed a meta-analysis of more than

2018 Evidence-Based Mental Health

167. Screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma and precancerous conditions (dysplasia and Barrett's esophagus) in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease with or without other risk factors: two systematic reviews and one overview of reviews to info Full Text available with Trip Pro

; Systematic review; Treatment. Conflict of interest statement DM is Co-Editor-in-Chief with Systematic Reviews . BH has previously received honoraria from Cornerstone Research Group for the provision of methodologic advice related to systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Figures Fig. 1 5 Guideline analytic framework Fig. 1 13 Guideline analytic framework Fig. 1 Guideline analytic framework Fig. 2 5 a PRISMA flow diagram for… Fig. 2 13 a PRISMA flow diagram for KQ 1. b PRISMA flow diagram for KQ… Fig. 2 (...) Screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma and precancerous conditions (dysplasia and Barrett's esophagus) in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease with or without other risk factors: two systematic reviews and one overview of reviews to info Screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma and precancerous conditions (dysplasia and Barrett's esophagus) in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease with or without other risk factors: two systematic reviews and one overview

2020 EvidenceUpdates

168. Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open): A Systematic Overview of Reviews

Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open): A Systematic Overview of Reviews Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open): A Systematic Overview of Reviews - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable (...) Your RSS Feed Name of RSS Feed: Number of items displayed: Create RSS Cancel RSS Link Copy Actions Cite Share Permalink Copy Page navigation Ann Surg Actions . 2020 May 8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003915. Online ahead of print. Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open): A Systematic Overview of Reviews , , , , , , , Affiliations Expand Affiliations 1 Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Toronto, Toronto

2020 EvidenceUpdates

169. Gray literature in systematic reviews on population health in the Middle East and North Africa: protocol of an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Gray literature in systematic reviews on population health in the Middle East and North Africa: protocol of an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping. Systematic review (SR) guidelines recommend extending literature search to gray literature in order to identify all available data related to the review topic. We aim to conduct an overview of SRs on population health in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), to assess the methodology of these SRs, to produce an evidence map (...) highlighting methodological gaps in SRs regarding gray literature searching, and to aid in developing future SRs by listing gray literature sources related to population health in MENA.We will conduct an overview of SRs based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. This overview will be reported following PRISMA 2009 guidelines. Using comprehensive search criteria, we will search the PubMed database to identify relevant SRs published since 2008. Our primary outcomes are gray

2018 Systematic reviews

170. Simultaneous vs. staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a metaanalysis

Simultaneous vs. staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a metaanalysis Untitled Document The CRD Databases will not be available from 08:00 BST on Friday 4th October until 08:00 BST on Monday 7th October for essential maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience.

2012 DARE.

171. Comprehensive Systematic Review Summary: Treatment of Tics in People with Tourette Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorders

Comprehensive Systematic Review Summary: Treatment of Tics in People with Tourette Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorders 1 Practice Guideline: The treatment of tics in people with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Authors Tamara Pringsheim, MD, MSc 1 ; Yolanda Holler-Managan, MD 2 ; Michael S. Okun, MD 3 ; Joseph Jankovic, MD 4 ; John Piacentini, PhD 5 ; Andrea E (...) for tics, including neurostimulation, and the risks associated with their use. A systematic review was performed to develop recommendations pertaining to the treatments of tics in children and adults with TS or chronic tic disorders. Antipsychotic medications have been commonly prescribed for this purpose, since the 1960s. The adverse effects associated with antipsychotic medications, 18 including movement disorders such as acute and tardive dystonia, tardive dyskinesia, akathisia and drug-induced

2019 American Academy of Neurology

172. Developing a Value Framework for Genetic Diagnosis: Part I A Systematic Review of Outcomes Hierarchies and Measurement Approaches

Developing a Value Framework for Genetic Diagnosis: Part I A Systematic Review of Outcomes Hierarchies and Measurement Approaches ACMG Value Review, March 16, 2012 Page 1 Developing a Value Framework for Genetic Diagnosis: Part I A Systematic Review of Outcomes Hierarchies and Measurement Approaches March 16, 2012 Prepared for: American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) ACMG Ad Hoc Committee on the Value of Genetic Diagnosis Prepared by: Linda A. Bradley, PhD, FACMG Glenn E Palomaki, PhD (...) Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) 23 Figure B1 Review Framework for the Evidence Review 24 Figure B2 Overview of Literature Search and Selection of Articles/Documents 25 Figure B3 ICF Brochure 26-27 Figure B4 PROMIS Information 28-29 References for Appendices 30-32 ACMG Value Review, March 16, 2012 Page 4 Commonly Used Acronyms and Abbreviations ACC/AHA American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association ACMG American College of Medical Genetics AHRQ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality CAD

2019 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

173. Long-Term Drug Therapy and Drug Holidays for Osteoporosis Fracture Prevention: A Systematic Review

Long-Term Drug Therapy and Drug Holidays for Osteoporosis Fracture Prevention: A Systematic Review Long-Term Drug Therapy and Drug Holidays for Osteoporosis Fracture Prevention: A Systematic Review Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 218 RComparative Effectiveness Review Number 218 Long-Term Drug Therapy and Drug Holidays for Osteoporosis Fracture Prevention: A Systematic Review Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 5600 (...) website at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov. Search on the title of the report. Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this report. For assistance contact epc@ahrq.hhs.gov. Suggested citation: Fink HA, MacDonald R, Forte ML, Rosebush CE, Ensrud KE, Schousboe JT, Nelson VA, Ullman K, Butler M, Olson CM, Taylor BC, Brasure M, Wilt TJ. Long-Term Drug Therapy and Drug Holidays for Osteoporosis Fracture Prevention: A Systematic Review. Comparative Effectiveness

2019 Effective Health Care Program (AHRQ)

174. Improving Access to and Usability of Systematic Review Data for Health Systems Guidelines Development

Improving Access to and Usability of Systematic Review Data for Health Systems Guidelines Development Methods Research Report Improving Access to and Usability of Systematic Review Data for Health Systems Guidelines Development Methods Research Report Improving Access to and Usability of Systematic Review Data for Health Systems Guidelines Development Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 (...) www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-2015-00009-I Prepared by: Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center Portland, OR Investigators: Annette M. Totten, Ph.D. Connor Smith, B.S. Kenneth Dunham, B.A. Rebecca M. Jungbauer, Dr.P.H., M.P.H. Elaine Graham, M.L.S. AHRQ Publication No. 19-EHC010-EF February 2019ii Key Messages Purpose of Project Identify and test interactive methods to make the large amount of data in an Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) systematic review more accessible for decision makers

2019 Effective Health Care Program (AHRQ)

175. Scaling Beyond Early Adopters: A Systematic Review and Key Informant Perspectives

Scaling Beyond Early Adopters: A Systematic Review and Key Informant Perspectives Management Briefs eBrief-no148 -- Self-Management of Epilepsy: A Systematic Review Enter search terms Button to search HSRD ® Inside VA Budget and Performance Inside the News Room National Observances Special Events » » » » » Management Briefs eBrief-no148 -- Self-Management of Epilepsy: A Systematic Review Health Services Research & Development Management eBrief no. 148 » Issue 148 March 2019 The report (...) is a product of the VA/HSR&D Evidence Synthesis Program. Self-Management of Epilepsy: A Systematic Review Epilepsy is a neurological disorder in which brain activity becomes abnormal, causing seizures or periods of unusual behavior, sensations, and sometimes loss of awareness. Epilepsy affects about 50 million people worldwide and is one of the most common chronic neurological conditions, with the potential to generate significant morbidity, impaired quality of life, socioeconomic decline, and high

2019 Veterans Affairs - R&D

176. Pilot To Promote Entry of Structured Data Into the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR)

Pilot To Promote Entry of Structured Data Into the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) Methods Research Report Pilot To Promote Entry of Structured Data Into the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) Methods Research Report Pilot To Promote Entry of Structured Data Into the Systematic Review Data Repository Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-2015-00002-I (...) ; 290-2015-00006-I Prepared by: Brown Evidence-based Practice Center Providence, RI Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center Baltimore, MD Investigators: Ian J. Saldanha, M.B.B.S., M.P.H., Ph.D. Birol Senturk, B.S. Bryant T. Smith, M.P.H. Karen A. Robinson, M.Sc., Ph.D. AHRQ Publication No. 19-EH028-EF October 2019 ii Key Messages Purpose of Project To promote the entry of structured data into the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) to facilitate interoperability and use

2019 Effective Health Care Program (AHRQ)

177. Performance and Usability of Machine Learning for Screening in Systematic Reviews: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Tool

Performance and Usability of Machine Learning for Screening in Systematic Reviews: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Tool Methods Research Report Performance and Usability of Machine Learning for Screening in Systematic Reviews: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Tools Methods Research Report Performance and Usability of Machine Learning for Screening in Systematic Reviews: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Tools Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health (...) not be able to fully access information in this report. For assistance contact EPC@ahrq.hhs.gov. Suggested citation: Gates A, Guitard S, Pillay J, Elliott SA, Dyson MP, Newton AS, Hartling L. Performance and Usability of Machine Learning for Screening in Systematic Reviews: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Tools. (Prepared by the University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2015-00001-I) AHRQ Publication No. 19(20)-EHC027- EF Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research

2019 Effective Health Care Program (AHRQ)

178. One-to-One Observation: Systematic Review

One-to-One Observation: Systematic Review Management Briefs eBrief-no162 -- One to One Observation: Systematic Review Enter search terms Button to search HSRD ® Inside VA Budget and Performance Inside the News Room National Observances Special Events » » » » » Management Briefs eBrief-no162 -- One to One Observation: Systematic Review Health Services Research & Development Management eBrief no. 162 » Issue 162 November 2019 The report is a product of the VA/HSR&D Evidence Synthesis Program. One (...) -to-One Observation: Systematic Review Preventing adverse events in hospitalized patients is a priority goal of patient safety programs. In-facility falls and in-facility suicide are two priority conditions that are thought to be preventable. An estimated 700,000 to 1,000,000 hospitalized patients fall each year, and as much as one-third of these falls are considered preventable. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported medical costs for falls totaled more than $50 billion in 2015

2019 Veterans Affairs - R&D

179. Effectiveness of Remote Triage: Systematic Review

Effectiveness of Remote Triage: Systematic Review Management Briefs eBrief-no161 -- Effectiveness of Remote Triage: Systematic Review Enter search terms Button to search HSRD ® Inside VA Budget and Performance Inside the News Room National Observances Special Events » » » » » Management Briefs eBrief-no161 -- Effectiveness of Remote Triage: Systematic Review Health Services Research & Development Management eBrief no. 161 » Issue 161 November 2019 The report is a product of the VA/HSR&D (...) Evidence Synthesis Program. Effectiveness of Remote Triage: Systematic Review The US healthcare system currently faces several challenges including caring for an increasing elderly population, an increasing patient population with multiple chronic conditions, and an uneven distribution of primary care providers. Additionally, many patients experience multiple barriers to receiving timely care, such as financial and logistical impediments. Such access challenges lead many people to seek acute or chronic

2019 Veterans Affairs - R&D

180. A systematic overview of systematic reviews examining the overall effectiveness of music interventions across all healthcare contexts in terms of physical, emotional, and cognitive outcomes.

A systematic overview of systematic reviews examining the overall effectiveness of music interventions across all healthcare contexts in terms of physical, emotional, and cognitive outcomes. Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility (...) of heterogeneity: species (stratified per species); sex (stratified per sex); duration of index ischemia (linear); stem cell dose (linear); blinding of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g

2020 PROSPERO

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>