## How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

- 190,665 results
- Evidence type
- Clinical Area

Use check boxes to select individual results below

## SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show### 166881. Review: CBT reduces fatigue in adults with chronic fatigue syndrome but effects at follow-up unclear

syndrome but effects at follow-up unclear Statistics from Altmetric.com QUESTION Question: How effective is cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in adults? Outcomes: Fatigue severity (measured on the Chalder Fatigue Scale or any other validated fatigue scale); clinical response (as defined by trial authors based on diagnostic interview or specified cut-off on validated scales). METHODS Design:

**Systematic****review**with**meta**-**analysis**. Data sources: The Cochrane (...)**Review**: CBT reduces fatigue in adults with chronic fatigue syndrome but effects at follow-up unclear**Review**: CBT reduces fatigue in adults with chronic fatigue syndrome but effects at follow-up unclear | Evidence-Based Mental Health We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising to you. You can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our . Log in using your username and password For personal#### 2009 Evidence-Based Mental Health

### 166882. Review: Methylphenidate and psychosocial treatments either alone or in combination reduce ADHD symptoms

treatments either alone or in combination reduce ADHD symptoms Statistics from Altmetric.com QUESTION Question: How effective are short-acting methylphenidate and psychosocial treatments, alone or in combination, for school-aged children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)? Outcomes: Core ADHD or oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder (ODD/CD) symptoms, social behaviour and academic functioning. METHODS Design:

**Systematic****review**with**meta**-**analysis**. Data sources: PubMed, PsychInfo (...)**Review**: Methylphenidate and psychosocial treatments either alone or in combination reduce ADHD symptoms**Review**: Methylphenidate and psychosocial treatments either alone or in combination reduce ADHD symptoms | Evidence-Based Mental Health We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising to you. You can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our . Log in using your username and password#### 2009 Evidence-Based Mental Health

### 166883. Is the glass half empty or half full?

is dry" or that he needs diuresis but how accurate are our assessments based on the clinical exam alone? A previous discussed the JVP and its use as a tool for volume status assessment and cited a

**systematic****review**stating that there is a “poor relationship between the isolated inspection of CVP and prediction of blood volume and fluid responsiveness.” One of my attendings gave me an on this topic several weeks ago: "Clinical assessment of extracellular fluid volume in hyponatremia". The article (...) . Accurate assessment of volume status is crucial in this setting. I have found US evaluation of the IVC and internal jugular vein to be incredibly helpful and quite easy to master if done frequently. Subscribe to: Interested in Contributing to the Renal Fellow Network? Email Matt or Gearoid NSMC Founding Member Get notified of new RFN posts by email Partner A nice repository of landmark articles and**reviews**in the field of nephrology at . are also included. Partner Endorsed by Follow RFN on Twitter#### 2012 Renal Fellow Network

### 166884. Safety, efficacy and quality of life associated with continuous glucose monitoring in people with diabetes

is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses (...) , language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166885. Safety and efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation and the treatment of venous thromboembolism in the elderly

no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess (...) outcome(s) Example: 1st author, year of publication, language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166886. Safety and efficacy of fondaparinux in renal failure

is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision (...) as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model is the typical model of choice#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166887. Risk factors associated with lower extremity stress fractures in runners

A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative (...) to be extracted: other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166888. Risk factors associated with Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) perpetration in military populations

A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative (...) to be extracted: other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166889. Review of the equity of services provided by community health workers

A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative (...) : other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166890. Review of public health emergency operations centers

is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision (...) as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model is the typical model of choice#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166891. Review of negative pressure wound therapy technologies

is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision (...) as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model is the typical model of choice#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166892. Review of exercise prehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients

A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative (...) : other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166893. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: indications and techniques across nations

A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative (...) to be extracted: other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166894. Reuse prevention syringes

the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both (...) to be extracted: intervention of interest Example: Serum creatinine; continuous; umol/L (may be recalculated from mg/dL). ">Data to be extracted: primary outcome(s) Example: Blood urea nitrogen; continuous; mmol/L (may be recalculated from mg/dL); Renal histological damage as assessed by Jablonski scale; continuous; Jablonski score. ">Data to be extracted: secondary outcome(s) Example: 1st author, year of publication, language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166895. Risk of incident type-2 diabetes, and incident coronary heart disease, associated with dietary glycaemic index by dose: for each disease, is there a dose-response relation and a dependence on macronutrient composition?

yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc (...) . ">Data to be extracted: secondary outcome(s) Example: 1st author, year of publication, language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166896. Risk of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular death in celiac disease

**review**process on the

**meta**-

**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the

**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the

**meta**-

**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative (...) to be extracted: other as well as a to

**meta**-

**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A

**meta**‐

**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If

**meta**‐

**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model

#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166897. Risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury in athletes on natural grass versus artificial turf playing surfaces

is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses (...) , language, journal. ">Data to be extracted: other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166898. Risk factors for violence and suicide in the general population: a meta-epidemiological study

**review**process on the

**meta**-

**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the

**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the

**meta**-

**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative (...) to be extracted: other as well as a to

**meta**-

**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A

**meta**‐

**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If

**meta**‐

**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model

#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166899. Risk factors for survival in patients with spinal bone metastases

A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the

**review**process on the**meta**-**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the**meta**-**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative (...) : other as well as a to**meta**-**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A**meta**‐**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If**meta**‐**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model#### 2014 PROSPERO

### 166900. Risk factors for survival and length of stay in neonatal care: a narrative review

**review**process on the

**meta**-

**analysis**outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the

**review**, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the

**meta**-

**analysis**, the analyses are re-run using the alternative (...) to be extracted: other as well as a to

**meta**-

**analysis**of pre-clinical studies are available. Example: A

**meta**‐

**analysis**will be performed for all outcome measures reported in 10 or more articles. For subgroup analysis a minimum of 8 studies per subgroup is required. If

**meta**‐

**analysis**is not possible, data will be reported through a descriptive summary. ">Planned approach Example: number of metastases: standardized mean difference; incidence of metastasis: risk ratio. ">Effect measure The random-effects model

#### 2014 PROSPERO

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>