How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

33,682 results for

"grant funding" or "obtaining grants" or "getting grants" or "grant awards" or (grants and "how to")

by
...
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

19841. Current views on convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) for COVID-19 treatment: a review and prospective meta-analysis based on previous viral respiratory disease pandemics

for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria (...) models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings

2020 PROSPERO

19842. Current trends in the application of causal inference methods to pooled longitudinal observational studies

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

19843. Current practices in hip precautions for total hip arthroplasty: anterior vs posterior approach

websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

19844. Curcumin for wound repair on diabetic rats/mice: A preclinical systematic review with meta-analysis

websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

19845. Critical Appraisal of COVID-19 Literature

") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening will be performed in two phases, namely initial screening based (...) of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how

2020 PROSPERO

19846. COVID-19: developing evidence-based messages to encourage preventive health behaviours

. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

19847. Covid-19 prevention strategies adopted with the elderly in home care: a systematic review

. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

19848. Contribution of biomarkers for early prognostication of severe progression in COVID patients: a systematic review

files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we

2020 PROSPERO

19849. Contraceptive-related safety concerns and related outcomes among U.S. women: A systematic review

websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

19850. Continuous versus interrupted open appendicectomy wound skin closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

19851. Contemporary management of extensive Aorto-Iliac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

19852. Contact and mixing patterns relevant to transmission of respiratory viruses in Low Income, Lower Middle Income and Upper Middle Income Countries

of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings

2020 PROSPERO

19853. Consistency of global recommendations regarding the choice of open versus laparoscopic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings

2020 PROSPERO

19854. Comparison of surgical results using chitosan for peripheral nerve repair in rats: a systematic review.

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

19855. Comparison of skeletal and dental effects between skeletal anchorage supported facemask approach and skeletal anchorage supported Class III elastics in patients with maxillary deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis

and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change

2020 PROSPERO

19856. Comparison of neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant therapy and surgery alone for carcinoma of the oesophagus: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change

2020 PROSPERO

19857. Comparison of influence of adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy on survival in patients after primary surgery for uterine carcinosarcoma stage I (FIGO 2009): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) . the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test

2020 PROSPERO

19858. Comparison of indoor and outdoor physical activity and sedentary time in early childhood education and care settings: a rapid review

, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion (...) , the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting

2020 PROSPERO

19859. Comparison of different types of clinical specimens for diagnosis of SARS-COV-2 infection: a systematic review

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

19860. Comparison of Concanavalin a-Induced Murine Autoimmune Hepatitis Models

(e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening will be performed (...) of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how

2020 PROSPERO

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>