How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

32,774 results for

"grant funding" or "obtaining grants" or "getting grants" or "grant awards" or (grants and "how to")

by
...
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

18181. Efficacy of docetaxel combined prednisone for the treatment of patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

18182. Efficacy of docetaxel combined carboplatin (DC) for the treatment of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) . the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test

2020 PROSPERO

18183. Efficacy of different methods of disinfection and sterilization to reuse masks and respirators: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion (...) , the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting

2020 PROSPERO

18184. Efficacy of dietary interventions for weight loss among overweight and obese adults: a systematic review

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

18185. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine improving early postoperative neurocognitive disorders in elderly male patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy

of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings

2020 PROSPERO

18186. Efficacy of ozone therapy in the symptomatology of temporomandibular joint: a systematic review

websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

18187. Efficacy of osteochondral allografts in the treatment of structural joint defects of the knee in patients with osteoarthritis at 12-month follow-up:Systematic review protocol and meta analysis

no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) . the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test

2020 PROSPERO

18188. Efficacy of oscillating-rotating power toothbrushes compared to high frequency sonic power toothbrushes on parameters of gingival health and dental plaque: a systematic review and meta-analysis

no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) . the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test

2020 PROSPERO

18189. Efficacy of intrawound treatments to prevent surgical site infection after spine surgery:a systematic review and network meta-analysis

record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion (...) , the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting

2020 PROSPERO

18190. Efficacy of Intravenous Sodium Nitroprusside for Schizophrenia: Meta-analysis

salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

18191. Efficacy of intrathecal baclofen bolus on neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review protocol of randomized controlled trials

of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings

2020 PROSPERO

18192. Efficacy of rehabilitation with different approaches of implant-supportedfull-archprosthetic designs: A systematic review

associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria (...) , the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting

2020 PROSPERO

18193. Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Kidney Cancer

. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening will be performed in two (...) of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how

2020 PROSPERO

18194. Efficacy of putty biomaterial as a bone substitute in the treatment of human osseous defect for periodontal regeneration: A systematic review

of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings

2020 PROSPERO

18195. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave (EPSW) combined spinal core decompression (SCD) for the treatment of patients with femoral head necrosis (FHN)

of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings

2020 PROSPERO

18196. Efficacy of exposure-based therapy in patients with anxiety, obsessive-compulsive or post-traumatic stress disorder and an additional comorbid mental health disorder: A systematic review

or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) . the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test

2020 PROSPERO

18197. Herbal therapy of HIV infection

") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening will be performed in two phases, namely initial screening based (...) of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how

2020 PROSPERO

18198. Herbal medicines for treating allergic rhinitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies

files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we

2020 PROSPERO

18199. Herbal medicines for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion (...) , the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting

2020 PROSPERO

18200. Herbal medicine Hwangryunhaedok-tang for dyslipidemia: a systematic review

salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>