How to Trip Rapid Review

Step 1: Select articles relevant to your search (remember the system is only optimised for single intervention studies)

Step 2: press

Step 3: review the result, and maybe amend the or if you know better! If we're unsure of the overall sentiment of the trial we will display the conclusion under the article title. We then require you to tell us what the correct sentiment is.

33,682 results for

"grant funding" or "obtaining grants" or "getting grants" or "grant awards" or (grants and "how to")

by
...
Alerts

Export results

Use check boxes to select individual results below

SmartSearch available

Trip's SmartSearch engine has discovered connected searches & results. Click to show

17681. Blood donation practice and associated factors among health care providers in Ethiopia systematic review and Meta analysis

associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria (...) , the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting

2020 PROSPERO

17682. Blood DNA methylation and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

17683. Blood carotenoids and vitamin A status with dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings

2020 PROSPERO

17684. Bleeding and thromboembolic complications in colorectal cancer patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic chemotherapy - a systematic review and meta-analysis

for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria (...) models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings

2020 PROSPERO

17685. Bite force of Children and Adolescents - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

17686. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women in Africa: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we

2020 PROSPERO

17687. Birth interval and wasting among under-five children in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we

2020 PROSPERO

17688. Birth asphyxia and its associated factors in Ethiopia: A protocol of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

17689. Bipolar disorder treatment accordingly to the staging, number of episodes or longitudinal trajectory: systematic review of clinical trials

record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion (...) , the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting

2020 PROSPERO

17690. Biopsychosocial factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: an umbrella review of systematic reviews

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

17691. Biomechanics of oropharyngeal and oesophageal dysphagia in patients with Parkinson's Disease: a systematic review

files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we

2020 PROSPERO

17692. Biomechanical, strength, and performance asymmetries at medical clearance and 1 year after medical clearance in individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria (...) models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings

2020 PROSPERO

17693. Biomechanical effects of lateral wedge insoles for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

17694. Biomarkers to predict allograft survival and rejection in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

associated files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria (...) , the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting

2020 PROSPERO

17695. Biomarkers to Identify Heterogeneous Response to Anti-HER2 Based Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer

files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we

2020 PROSPERO

17696. Biomarkers that explains cognitive impairment after ECT

" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening will be performed in two phases, namely (...) of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how

2020 PROSPERO

17697. Biomarkers of psychological stress in cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapy: a systematic review

or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

17698. Biomarkers of mental illness and the Human Hand - A Systematic Review

(e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening will be performed (...) of outcome assessment reported (stratified yes vs no). For stratified analyses, a minimum number of 8 studies per subgroup is required. ">Subgroup analyses A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the impact of decisions taken in the review process on the meta-analysis outcome. These decisions may have been made in various stages of the review, e.g. the decision to exclude certain disease models, the decision to pool certain units of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how

2020 PROSPERO

17699. Biomarkers of inflammation and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review

. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening (...) , the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we will re-run the analysis

2020 PROSPERO

17700. Biomarkers of depression in individuals with multiple sclerosis and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

files or external websites. Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion (...) of measurement for an outcome, the choice of effect measure, how subgroup variables are stratified etc. In order to assess the robustness of the findings of the meta-analysis, the analyses are re-run using the alternative options for each decision. If the results of both meta-analyses are similar, the results seem robust. When the conclusions of a meta-analysis significantly change, this should be discussed. Example: To test the robustness of our findings when selecting the time point of greatest efficacy we

2020 PROSPERO

To help you find the content you need quickly, you can filter your results via the categories on the right-hand side >>>>