Hi, your search found this article for you on Trip:
Cytotoxicity of Newly Developed Ortho MTA Root-end Filling Materials.
Journal of Endodontics, 2012
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Various materials have been advocated for use as root-end filling materials.
The purpose of the present in vitro study was to compare the cytotoxicity of 4 root-end filling materials: glass ionomer cement (GIC; Fuji II, GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan), reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol cement (IRM; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), and 2 types of mineral trioxide aggregate.
To quantitatively evaluate the cytotoxicity of test materials, the 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) assay was used.
Cell viability was recorded by measuring the optical density of each test well in reference to controls.
RESULTS: The XTT assay showed that the cell viability of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental) was higher than that of GIC and Ortho MTA (BioMTA, Seoul, Republic of Korea) at all time points.
The scanning electron microscopic analysis revealed that elongated, dense, and almost confluent cells were observed in the cultures of GIC, Ortho MTA, and ProRoot MTA specimens.
In contrast, cells on the surface of IRM were rounded in shape, and the numbers and the density of the cells were smaller than that in the other groups.
PMID: 23146650 [PubMed - in process] Full Text Sources Miscellaneous
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the material interface of adjacent layers of dental materials.
A comparative study of the effects of three root-end filling materials on proliferation and adherence of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts.