Latest & greatest articles for screening

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on screening or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on screening and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for screening

1. Alcohol-related trauma reinjury prevention with hospital-based screening in adult populations Full Text available with Trip Pro

Alcohol-related trauma reinjury prevention with hospital-based screening in adult populations Alcohol-related trauma reinjury prevention with hospital-based screening in adult populations - Practice Management Guideline Search » Alcohol-related trauma reinjury prevention with hospital-based screening in adult populations Published 2020 Citation: Authors Kodadek, Lisa M. MD; Freeman, Jennifer J. MD; Tiwary, Devesh MD; Drake, Mack Dillon DO; Schroeder, M. Elizabeth MD; Dultz, Linda MD, MPH; White (...) , January 18, 2019 in Austin, Texas. Address for reprints: Lisa M. Kodadek, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 21st Ave, South Suite 404, Medical Arts Building Nashville, TN 37212; email: ; . Online date: September 5, 2019 BACKGROUND Unaddressed alcohol use among injured patients may result in recurrent injury or death. Many trauma centers incorporate alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for injured patients with alcohol use disorders, but systematic reviews

2020 Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

2. Designing an effective and efficient case identification, screening and assessment process

Designing an effective and efficient case identification, screening and assessment process NHS England » Designing an effective and efficient case identification, screening and assessment process Search Search Menu Designing an effective and efficient case identification, screening and assessment process Document first published: 22 January 2020 Page updated: 22 January 2020 Topic: Publication type: Document PDF 594 KB

2020 NHS England

3. Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Breast Cancer

Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Breast Cancer Breast Cancer: Community Health Workers | The Community Guide Welcome to The Community Guide! Let us know what you think of the website by completing this . Open Navigation or Search form Search Search The Community Guide You are here » Systematic Review Topic Recommended (strong evidence) April 2019 Audience Adults Low-income Population Women Setting Clinical/Health Systems Community Home Strategy Health (...) Education Screening Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Breast Cancer Tabs Snapshot Summary of CPSTF Finding The interventions that engage community health workers to increase screening for breast cancer by mammography. Evidence shows these interventions increase breast cancer screening rates when community health workers deliver them independently or as part of an implementation team. Interventions that engage community health workers to increase breast cancer screening

2020 Community Preventive Services Task Force

4. Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Colorectal Cancer

Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Cancer: Community Health Workers | The Community Guide Welcome to The Community Guide! Let us know what you think of the website by completing this . Open Navigation or Search form Search Search The Community Guide You are here » Systematic Review Topic Recommended (strong evidence) April 2019 Audience Adults Low-income Population Setting Clinical/Health Systems Community Home Strategy Health (...) Education Screening Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Colorectal Cancer Tabs Snapshot Summary of CPSTF Finding The interventions that engage community health workers to increase screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or fecal occult blood test [FOBT]. Evidence shows these interventions increase colorectal cancer screening rates when community health workers deliver them independently or as part of an implementation team. Interventions that engage community

2020 Community Preventive Services Task Force

5. Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Cervical Cancer

Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Cervical Cancer Cervical Cancer: Community Health Workers | The Community Guide Welcome to The Community Guide! Let us know what you think of the website by completing this . Open Navigation or Search form Search Search The Community Guide You are here » Systematic Review Topic Recommended (strong evidence) April 2019 Audience Adults Low-income Population Women Setting Clinical/Health Systems Community Home Strategy Health (...) Education Screening Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Cervical Cancer Tabs Snapshot Summary of CPSTF Finding The interventions that engage community health workers to increase screening for cervical cancer by Pap smear. Evidence shows these interventions increase cervical cancer screening rates when community health workers deliver them independently or as part of an implementation team. In addition, economic evidence shows these interventions are cost-effective

2020 Community Preventive Services Task Force

6. ASGE guideline on screening and surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus

ASGE guideline on screening and surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus GUIDELINE ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis Prepared by: ASGE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE COMMITTEE James L. Buxbaum, MD, FASGE, 1 Syed M. Abbas Fehmi, MD, MSc, FASGE, 2 Shahnaz Sultan, MD, MHSc, 3,4,5 Douglas S. Fishman, MD, FAAP, FASGE, 6 Bashar J. Qumseya, MD, MPH, 7 Victoria K. Cortessis, PhD, 1 Hannah Schilperoort, MLIS, MA, 8 Lynn Kysh, MLIS, 8 Lea Matsuoka, MD, FACS

2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

7. Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Full Text available with Trip Pro

Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Welcome to the new PubMed. For legacy PubMed (...) collection Name your collection: Name must be less than 100 characters Choose a collection: Unable to load your collection due to an error Add Cancel Add to My Bibliography My Bibliography Unable to load your delegates due to an error Add Cancel Actions Cite Share Permalink Copy Page navigation JAMA Netw Open Actions , 2 (12), e1917676 2019 Dec 2 Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical

2020 EvidenceUpdates

8. Prevalence of incidental findings of low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans in lung cancer screening

Prevalence of incidental findings of low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans in lung cancer screening Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files (...) : Example: Screening will be performed in two phases, namely initial screening based on title and abstract, followed by full-text screening of the eligible articles for final inclusion. In each phase, 2 observers will independently assess each article. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion, or by consulting a third investigator. ">Procedure for study selection Example : Title-abstract screening: 1. Not an original full research paper (e.g. review, editorial) 2. Not an in vivo animal study 3

2020 PROSPERO

9. Screening strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review protocol

Screening strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review protocol Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email (...) salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening

2020 PROSPERO

10. Screening and diagnostic tools for complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review

Screening and diagnostic tools for complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites (...) . Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening

2020 PROSPERO

11. Screening and brief advice for alcohol and tobacco use

Screening and brief advice for alcohol and tobacco use Screening and brief advice for alcohol and tobacco use - GOV.UK Tell us whether you accept cookies We use about how you use GOV.UK. We use this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve government services. Accept all cookies You’ve accepted all cookies. You can at any time. Hide Search Guidance Screening and brief advice for alcohol and tobacco use Guidance on screening and providing brief advice for alcohol

2020 Public Health England

12. Long-term Effects of Intensive Multifactorial Therapy in Individuals With Screen-Detected Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: 10-year Follow-Up of the ADDITION-Europe Cluster-Randomised Trial

Long-term Effects of Intensive Multifactorial Therapy in Individuals With Screen-Detected Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: 10-year Follow-Up of the ADDITION-Europe Cluster-Randomised Trial Long-term Effects of Intensive Multifactorial Therapy in Individuals With Screen-Detected Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: 10-year Follow-Up of the ADDITION-Europe Cluster-Randomised Trial - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features (...) Create a new collection Add to an existing collection Name your collection: Name must be less than 100 characters Choose a collection: Unable to load your collection due to an error Add Cancel Add to My Bibliography My Bibliography Unable to load your delegates due to an error Add Cancel Actions Cite Share Permalink Copy Page navigation Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Actions , 7 (12), 925-937 Dec 2019 Long-term Effects of Intensive Multifactorial Therapy in Individuals With Screen-Detected Type 2

2020 EvidenceUpdates

13. The values of liquid biopsy as a screening tool of cancer: a systematic review

The values of liquid biopsy as a screening tool of cancer: a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Email (...) salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) * Measures of effect * Measures of effect Email salutation (e.g. "Dr Smith" or "Joanne") for correspondence: Organisation web address: Grant number(s) Context and rationale Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening

2020 PROSPERO

14. Cost-effectiveness of screening and early detection programs or initiatives for oral cancer: a systematic review

Cost-effectiveness of screening and early detection programs or initiatives for oral cancer: a systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated (...) criteria: Example: Screening will be performed in two phases, namely initial screening based on title and abstract, followed by full-text screening of the eligible articles for final inclusion. In each phase, 2 observers will independently assess each article. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion, or by consulting a third investigator. ">Procedure for study selection Example : Title-abstract screening: 1. Not an original full research paper (e.g. review, editorial) 2. Not an in vivo animal

2020 PROSPERO

15. A systematic review of the effect of rurality on breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening uptake in developed countries

A systematic review of the effect of rurality on breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening uptake in developed countries Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any (...) : Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening will be performed in two phases, namely initial screening based on title and abstract, followed by full-text screening of the eligible articles for final inclusion. In each phase, 2 observers will independently assess each article. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion, or by consulting a third investigator. ">Procedure for study selection Example : Title-abstract screening: 1. Not an original full research paper (e.g. review, editorial) 2

2020 PROSPERO

16. A systematic review of methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments

A systematic review of methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content (...) : Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening will be performed in two phases, namely initial screening based on title and abstract, followed by full-text screening of the eligible articles for final inclusion. In each phase, 2 observers will independently assess each article. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion, or by consulting a third investigator. ">Procedure for study selection Example : Title-abstract screening: 1. Not an original full research paper (e.g. review

2020 PROSPERO

17. A systematic review of guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for genetic screening, prostate cancer screening, genetic counselling and the treatment of prostate cancer in men with DNA damage response gene (DDR+ ) mutations

A systematic review of guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for genetic screening, prostate cancer screening, genetic counselling and the treatment of prostate cancer in men with DNA damage response gene (DDR+ ) mutations Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission (...) criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Example: Screening will be performed in two phases, namely initial screening based on title and abstract, followed by full-text screening of the eligible articles for final inclusion. In each phase, 2 observers will independently assess each article. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion, or by consulting a third investigator. ">Procedure for study selection

2020 PROSPERO

18. Summary of Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations for Non-HIV Immunocompromised Women

Summary of Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations for Non-HIV Immunocompromised Women (current immunosuppressants are listed in Table 2). Women with RA and IBD not on immunosuppressants and women with DM were considered at no increased risk compared with the general population. Screening recommendations based on these risks are summarizedinTable3. REFERENCES 1. GrulichAE,vanLeeuwenMT,FalsterMO,etal.Incidence ofcancersin peoplewithHIV/AIDScomparedwithimmunosuppressedtransplant recipients (...) . If resultofcytologyisnormalandHPVisnegative,co-testingcanbe performedevery 3 y -Iftransplantbefore theage of21y, begin screening within1 yofsexualdebut -Continue screeningthroughout lifetime (older than 65y). Discontinue screeningbasedonshareddiscussionregardingqualityand durationoflife rather thanage -Screenpatientsondialysis and posttransplantsimilarly Allogeneichematopoietic stem cell transplant -Cytologyisrecommendedifyounger than 30y -Co-testingispreferred, but cytologyisacceptableif 30yorolder -Ifusing cytologyalone, perform

2019 American Society for Clinical Pathology

19. Evaluation of the C2HEST Risk Score as a Possible Opportunistic Screening Tool for Incident Atrial Fibrillation in a Healthy Population (From a Nationwide Danish Cohort Study) Full Text available with Trip Pro

Evaluation of the C2HEST Risk Score as a Possible Opportunistic Screening Tool for Incident Atrial Fibrillation in a Healthy Population (From a Nationwide Danish Cohort Study) A simple clinical score, C2HEST (C2: CAD/COPD [1 point each]; H: Hypertension; E: Elderly [Age ≥75, doubled]; S: Systolic HF [doubled]; T: Thyroid disease [hyperthyroidism]) has been proposed to predict incident atrial fibrillation (AF), with good discrimination and internal calibration. To define high-risk patients (...) at particular age strata for incident AF in a nationwide population cohort, who could potentially be targeted for AF screening, we used a nationwide cohort study of all Danish citizen aged ≥65 years to evaluate the performance of the C2HEST score. "High risk" subjects at age 65, 70, and 75 had 5-year risks of new onset AF of 11.8%, 14.2% and 13.6%, respectively, and the corresponding event rates were 2.99, 3.67, and 3.38 per 100 person years, respectively. Associated hazard ratios (HR) were 4.08 (95

2019 EvidenceUpdates

20. Sequential screening for lung cancer in a high-risk group: randomised controlled trial: LungSEARCH: a randomised controlled trial of Surveillance using sputum and imaging for the EARly detection of lung Cancer in a High-risk group Full Text available with Trip Pro

Sequential screening for lung cancer in a high-risk group: randomised controlled trial: LungSEARCH: a randomised controlled trial of Surveillance using sputum and imaging for the EARly detection of lung Cancer in a High-risk group Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening detects early-stage lung cancer and reduces mortality. We proposed a sequential approach targeted to a high-risk group as a potentially efficient screening strategy.LungSEARCH was a national multicentre randomised trial (...) . Current/ex-smokers with mild/moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were allocated (1:1) to have 5 years surveillance or not. Screened participants provided annual sputum samples for cytology and cytometry, and if abnormal were offered annual LDCT and autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB). Those with normal sputum provided annual samples. The primary end-point was the percentage of lung cancers diagnosed at stage I/II (nonsmall cell) or limited disease (small cell).1568 participants were

2019 EvidenceUpdates